1. The South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s Third Thursday Web Forum Targets and Indicators Update – Where We Are So Far Thursday, September 20, 2012

2. Third Thursday Web Forum Agenda Introductions Updates Monthly Topic: Targets and Indicators Update – Where We Are So Far Questions & Discussion of Monthly Topic Questions & Discussion of SALCC Close

3. Introductions Janet Cakir, Socioeconomic Adaption Coordinator Amy Keister, GIS Coordinator Ginger Deason, Information Transfer Specialist/Forest Service Liaison Ken McDermond, Coordinator Rua Mordecai, Science Coordinator

4. Updates CPA pilot project – seeking volunteers Biological Objectives Workshops coming up Planning for Francis Marion stakeholder meeting Any web site member can share news through a blog post www.southatlanticlcc.org

5. Setting a Course for a Sustainable Landscape

6. What does the SALCC do? Mission: Create a shared blueprint for landscape conservation actions that sustain natural and cultural resources

7. Indicators and Targets: Why do they matter? The blueprint will need to paint a compelling picture of the future of the South Atlantic region

8. It needs to represent why we care about the ecosystems of the area Indicators and Targets: Why do they matter?

9. Natural Resource Indicators Team Purpose: To develop the process for building off existing efforts to set indicators and measurable targets for SALCC natural resource priorities

10. Who’s on the team? Jon AmbroseGA DNR / SWAP Shannon DeatonNC WRC / SWAP John StantonFWS / ACJV Linda PearsallNC DENR / Natural Heritage Robert BoylesSC DNR - Marine division Pete CampbellFWS / ENCSEVA Dean CarpenterNC DENR / APNEP Maria WhiteheadTNC

11. Who’s on the team? Mary LongUSFS Tim PinionNPS Wilson LaneyFWS/ Numerous partnerships Roger PuglieseSAFMC Reggie ThackstonGA DNR / Private lands Breck CarmichaelSC DNR Rick DurbrowEPA Vic EngelUSGS / Everglades restoration

12. Today’s goal Give you an update on where things seem to be headed

13. Today’s goal Give you an update on where things seem to be headed An updated draft will be ready after Sept 25th

14. Draft process Currently in development

15. Overall process 1. Foundational documents (Complete by Nov 2012) o Synthesis of existing indicators and targets o Definitions and framework for indicators o Criteria to be considered for indicators 2. Based on foundational documents, get broad input on potential indicators and process for revising those indicators in the future (Nov-Feb 2012) o Selection team o Revision team

16. Overall process 3. Synthesis of input into steering committee recommendation (Feb 2013) o Summary of input from key audiences in Step 2 Larger conservation community (Web Community + targeted interviews) Large partnerships (Partnership committee) Organizational input from Steering Committee Surrounding LCCs o In person meeting of Selection and Revision Team to take input from key audiences and develop final recommendations to the Steering Committee

17. Overall process 4.Indicators/targets and process for revision approved by steering committee (March 2013) o In person meeting to select indicators and targets and decide on process for revisions 5.Assessment of indicator function (Starting Spring 2013?)

18. Indicator process flowchart (Sept - Mar) September October November December January February March Final Decision Indicator team SALCC community Steering committee Process approved Draft process from indicator team Revised process Raleigh workshop Savannah workshop Web community Indicators and revision process Two teams: 1) Indicator selection and 2) Process for revising indicators Web community / Partnership committee Formal member organization input

19. About the Raleigh and Savannah workshops Goal: Review multiple processes for establishing conservation objectives while providing specific feedback on: o Draft processes from the South Atlantic LCC and the Fish and Wildlife Service o Opportunities for establishing shared objectives through a single process

20. Foundational documents Currently in development

21. Synthesis of existing plans Compile spreadsheet of existing indicators for each habitat type Build off existing work to minimize redundancy

22. Synthesis of existing plans: Sources Current sources o SWAPs o Atlantic Coast Joint Venture o Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: 2012 Ecosystem Assessment o Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership: Southeast Aquatic Habitat Plan o USFWS Southeast Biologist Conference o NOAA Southeast and Caribbean Regional Team (SECART) o NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program o National Bobwhite Conservation Initiative 2.0 o Fishery Management Plans o USFS Management Indicator Species o America’s Longleaf Conservation Plan In the works o National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Longleaf Stewardship Fund o ENC/SEVA Strategic Plan

23. Definitions Sources: Bennett, James P. 2000. Ecological Indicators for the Nation: Committee to Evaluate Indicators for Monitoring Aquatic and Terrestrial Environments, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 180 p., ISBN 0-309-06845-2. Doren, R.F., Trexler, J.C., Harwell, M., and Best, G.R., Editors, 2008. System- wide Indicators for Everglades Restoration 2008 Assessment. Unpublished Technical Report. 43pp. http://www.sfrestore.org/scg/documents/2008_System- wideIndicatorsReport.pdf http://www.sfrestore.org/scg/documents/2008_System- wideIndicatorsReport.pdf South Atlantic LCC 2012 Science Assessment. http://www.southatlanticlcc.org/page/science-assessment-1 http://www.southatlanticlcc.org/page/science-assessment-1

24. Definitions Priority: Desired conservation outcome that is difficult to measure Indicator: A metric that is designed to inform us easily and quickly about the conditions of a system Target: A numeric goal for an indicator Objective: A priority with one or more indicators and targets for each indicator

25. Complete objectives: Examples Integrity of open pine systems (priority) - Brown-headed Nuthatch (indicator) - Increase coastal plain population by 50% (target) Integrity of estuarine and marine systems (priority) - Sea grasses collectively (indicator) - Double the area of sea grasses (target)

26. SALCC Framework Natural resources o Integrity of ecological systems o Viability of T&E species Natural resources o Integrity of ecological systems o Viability of T&E species Cultural resources o Sites o Objects o Biotic cultural resources Cultural resources o Sites o Objects o Biotic cultural resources Socioeconomic resources o Recreation o Human health o Economy Socioeconomic resources o Recreation o Human health o Economy

27. SALCC Framework Natural resources Beaches and Dunes Estuarine Marine Forested Wetlands (mineral soils) Forested Wetlands (organic soils) Freshwater aquatic Freshwater marshes Managed wetlands Grassland – Prairie – Savannah Southern Pine Scrub-shrub Upland Hardwood Xeric and Maritime Scrub Natural resources Beaches and Dunes Estuarine Marine Forested Wetlands (mineral soils) Forested Wetlands (organic soils) Freshwater aquatic Freshwater marshes Managed wetlands Grassland – Prairie – Savannah Southern Pine Scrub-shrub Upland Hardwood Xeric and Maritime Scrub

28. Criteria for indicator selection Indicators o Ability of the indicator to represent a variety of organisms within that habitat type throughout the entire LCC o Amount of overlap with existing plans and processes o Relevancy and scale to respond to big landscape threats in the region o Ease of monitoring o Are indicators sensitive enough to reflect landscape changes but sufficiently monitored to mask short term variations? o How well will this indicator resonate with the American public? o How well can this indicator link with an economic value? Targets o Amount of overlap with existing plans and processes o Attainability of the targets

29. Criteria for indicator selection What can be a natural resource indicator? o Any metric that meets the indicator definition in Section 2 (Definitions) and focuses on ecosystem integrity as defined in Section 2 (Framework) can be a potential natural resource indicator. This could include positive indicators (e.g., species, guilds, native habitat extent, etc.) or negative indicators (e.g., nonnative species, extent of habitat alteration, etc.) Number of indicators per habitat o To simplify the modeling and reporting on indicators, each habitat should have a maximum of eight total indicators (ideally less)

30. Indicator process flowchart (Sept - Mar) September October November December January February March Final Decision Indicator team SALCC community Steering committee Process approved Draft process from indicator team Revised process Raleigh workshop Savannah workshop Web community Indicators and revision process Two teams: 1) Indicator selection and 2) Process for revising indicators Web community / Partnership committee Formal member organization input

31. Thoughts, suggestions, or questions?

32. Questions/Comments Questions or comments about your SALCC’s work on targets and indicators? Questions or comments in general about the SALCC, what we’re doing, where we’re going, etc.?

33. Next Month’s Web Forum Data Product: Vegetation dynamics projections to inform conservation in the Southeast  Jen Costanza, NCSU BASIC lab  October 18  10:00am Eastern

34. Contacts Ken McDermond – ken_mcdermond@fws.govken_mcdermond@fws.gov Rua Mordecai – rua@southatlanticlcc.orgrua@southatlanticlcc.org Janet Cakir – janet_cakir@nps.govjanet_cakir@nps.gov Amy Keister – amy_keister@fws.govamy_keister@fws.gov Laurie Rounds – laurie.rounds@noaa.govlaurie.rounds@noaa.gov Ginger Deason – ginger@southatlanticlcc.orgginger@southatlanticlcc.org Hilary Cole – hlcole@ncsu.eduhlcole@ncsu.edu