Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

All life is interconnected by descent

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "All life is interconnected by descent"— Presentation transcript:

1 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Classification & Evolution of Caminalcules

2 All life is interconnected by descent
Humans Rattlesnake Pine tree Amoeba Bacterium How to determine the pattern of descent?

3 Systematics - field of biology dealing with diversity and evolutionary history of life
Includes Taxonomy: DINC Description Identification Nomenclature Classification Goal: Determine Evolutionary History (Phylogeny) of Life

4 Description = assign features Character = a feature (e.g., “petal color”) Character states = two or more forms of a character (e.g., “red,” “white”).

5 Identification = associate an unknown with a known How? One way:
Taxonomic Key, e.g., Tree …………………………………….…………… Species A Leaves simple …….………………………… Species B Leaves pinnate …….………..…..…..…… Species C Herb Flowers red …….…………………………… Species D Flowers white …….…………………..…… Species E

6 Nomenclature Naming, according to a formal system. Binomial: Species are two names (Linnaeus): E.g., Homo sapiens Homo = genus name sapiens = specific epithet Homo sapiens = species name

7 Nomenclature Hierarchical Ranks: Domain Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species

8 Classification Placing objects, e.g., life, into some type of order.
Taxon = a taxonomic group (plural = taxa).

9 How to classify life Phenetic classification
Based on overall similarity Those organisms most similar are classified more “closely” together.

10 Problem with phenetic classification:
Can be arbitrary, e.g., classify these:

11 Phylogenetic classification
Based on known (inferred) evolutionary history. Advantage: Classification reflects pattern of evolution Classification not ambiguous

12 = representation of the history of life

13

14

15 Ingroup – group studied Outgroup – group not part of ingroup, used to “root” tree

16 Branch point (node) Taxon A Taxon B Sister taxa Taxon C ANCESTRAL
Fig. 26-5 Branch point (node) Taxon A Taxon B Sister taxa Taxon C ANCESTRAL LINEAGE Taxon D Taxon E Taxon F Common ancestor of taxa A–F Polytomy

17 Apomorphy (derived trait)
= a new, derived feature E.g., for this evolutionary transformation scales > feathers (ancestral feature) (derived feature) Presence of feathers is an apomorphy for birds.

18 Taxa are grouped by apomorphies
Apomorphies are the result of evolution. Taxa sharing apomorphies underwent same evolutionary history should be grouped together.

19 Principle of Parsimony
That cladogram (tree) having the fewest number of “steps” (evolutionary changes) is the one accepted. Okham’s razor: the simplest explanation, with fewest number of “ad hoc” hypotheses, is accepted.

20 Other methods of phylogeny reconstruction:
Maximum Likelihood or Bayesian analysis Uses probabilities Advantage: can use evolutionary models.

21

22 Sequentially group taxa by shared derived character states (apomorphies)
Lancelet (outgroup) (outgroup) Lancelet Salamander Lamprey Leopard Lamprey Tuna Turtle Vertebral column (backbone) Tuna 1 1 1 1 1 Vertebral column Hinged jaws 1 1 1 1 Salamander Hinged jaws CHARACTERS Four walking legs 1 1 1 Turtle Four walking legs Amniotic (shelled) egg 1 1 Amniotic egg Leopard Hair 1 Hair (a) Character table (b) Phylogenetic tree Fig

23 DNA sequence data – most important type of data
1 Deletion 2 Insertion Fig. 26-8a

24 DNA sequence data - alignment
3 Fig. 26-8b 4 Each nucleotide position = Character Character states = specific nucleotide

25 Homology Similarity resulting from common ancestry.
E.g., the forelimb bones of a bird, bat, and cat.

26

27 Homoplasy (analogy) Similarity not due to common ancestry
Reversal – loss of new (apomorphic) feature, resembles ancestral (old) feature. Convergence (parallelism) – gain of new, similar features independently.

28 Convergent evolution: spines of cacti & euphorbs
Cactus Euphorb

29 Convergent evolution: spines of cacti & euphorbs
euphorb spines cactus spines

30 * * Leg-less lizards Snake
Both examples of reversal within Tetrapods: loss of a derived feature – forelimbs. legged lizards leg-less lizards snakes * * Example of convergence relative to one another! Independently evolved. *= loss of legs gain of legs (Tetrapods)

31 Convergent evolution: wings of some animals evolved independently

32 Convergent evolution: Australian “mole” and N. Am. “mole”
Fig. 26-7 Convergent evolution: Australian “mole” and N. Am. “mole”

33 Orthology – genes homologous
Gene Duplication can occur! Ancestral gene Ancestral species Speciation with divergence of gene Orthology – genes homologous Orthologous genes Species A Species B (a) Orthologous genes Species A Gene duplication and divergence Paralogy – genes not homologous Paralogous genes Species A after many generations (b) Paralogous genes Fig

34 Common ancestry

35 Monophyletic Group a group consisting of: a common ancestor +
all descendents of that common ancestor

36

37

38

39

40

41

42 C B F E D A Cladograms can be “flipped” at nodes, show same relationships

43 One can date divergence times with molecular clock and fossils
Fig One can date divergence times with molecular clock and fossils Drosophila Lancelet Zebrafish Frog Chicken Human Mouse PALEOZOIC MESOZOIC CENOZOIC 542 251 65.5 Present Millions of years ago

44 Relationship = recency of common ancestry i.e., taxa sharing a common ancestor more recent in time are more closely related than those sharing common ancestors more distant in time.

45 Example: Are fish more closely related to sharks or to humans?

46

47

48

49 Example: Are crocodyles more closely related to lizards or to birds?

50

51

52 Paraphyletic group Consist of common ancestor but not all descendents
Paraphyletic groups are unnatural, distort evolutionary history, and should not be recognized.

53

54 “Reptilia” here paraphyletic

55 Re-defined Reptilia monophyletic

56

57 Did humans evolve from apes?
Importance of a name: Did humans evolve from apes?

58

59 Pongidae “Great Apes” Hominidae

60 Pongidae “Great Apes” Pongidae or Hominidae

61 Pongidae or Hominidae

62 Pongidae or Hominidae

63

64 We are human, but we are also apes.
We share unique human features. We also share features with other apes (and with other animals, plants, fungi, bacteria, etc.). Humans didn’t evolve from apes, humans are apes.

65 Importance of systematics & evolution:
1) Foundation of biology - study of biodiversity 2) Basis for classification of life 3) Gives insight into biological processes: speciation processes adaptation to environment 4) Can be aesthetically/intellectually pleasing!

66 E.g., schistosomiasis

67

68 Schistosomiasis: knowledge of species diversity and evolutionary history of primary host can aid in controlling parasite (Schistosoma, a fluke) Phylogeny of Oncomelania snails

69 All of life is interconnected by descent.

70 There are no “higher” or “lower” species.


Download ppt "All life is interconnected by descent"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google