Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Annual Nutrient Removal by the Primary Hay Crops in the South Adapted from Southern Forages, 2007 and Myer et al, 2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Annual Nutrient Removal by the Primary Hay Crops in the South Adapted from Southern Forages, 2007 and Myer et al, 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Annual Nutrient Removal by the Primary Hay Crops in the South Adapted from Southern Forages, 2007 and Myer et al, 2010.

3 Spinner Spreader Air-flow Applicator

4 Spinner Spreader Source: Fulton et al., 2003; 2005

5 Air-flow Applicator Application Rate (lbs/acre) Desired Levels 400 lbs/A 100 lbs/A 200 lbs/A 300 lbs/A 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

6 Spinner Spreader Source: Fulton et al., 2003 and unpublished data Air-flow Applicator

7 Low to High High to Low Source: Fulton et al., 2003

8 Fertilization Trick Account for N Loss from Urea-based Products

9 N Fertilizer Application Urea urease + H 2 0

10 Urea urease Ammonia + H 2 0 Ammonium +

11 Urea urease Ammonia + H 2 0 Ammonium + AN 34-0-0 Nitrate -

12 The Effectiveness of Some Alternative N Sources at Low, Medium, and High Fertilization Rates on Hybrid Bermudagrasses (Relative to Ammonium Nitrate). Nitrogen SourceFertilization Rates < 200 lbs*250-350 lbs> 400 lbs Ammonium Nitrate 100% Amm. Sulfate 95-97%95-105%60-70% Anhyd. Ammonia 92-94%93-95%94-95% UAN Solution 80-85%85-92%92-95% Urea 79-82%82-92%88-93% * Actual lbs of N per acre per year. Source: Burton and Jackson, 1962; Silveria et al., 2007.

13 Alternative N Sources Take-home message: If you have to use a urea-based product, be careful about cutting your rate back too much. -They are relatively less effective at low rates.

14 Fertilization Strategies New N Fertilizer Products

15 Introduction Without AN, users of N face risky alternatives.  NH 3 volatilization loss Urease is abundant in thatch & organic layers  High N use in hay. Enhanced Efficiency N Fertilizer Products may reduce volatilization loss  Urease inhibition  Encapsulate & release Ammonium Nitrate Urea NBPT maleic-itaconic co-polymer Polymer Coating

16 Ammonia Volatilization Trap Data 2008-2009 (avg. over two locations)

17

18 Bermudagrass Hay Yield 2008-2009 (Calhoun)

19 Results: Yield Data 2008-09: Forage Yield of ‘Russell’ Bermudagrass Equal Splits † 20082009 SourceEatontonCalhounEatontonCalhoun -------------------- (lbs of DM/acre) --------------------- ATU2 8908 ‡ 19291 1143117525 ESN2 643016033 816317019 NSN2 870416985 1022616464 Urea2 849017302 1073014955 Urea4 721118500 814215948 AN4 964118218 1210617604 Check- 268810009 217810409 LSD 0.05 1204 1552 10592460 † Equal split applications of N that occurred during the season. Total N applied = 300 lbs N/acre. ‡ Items that are in bold font are not significantly different from the highest value in the column.

20 Bermudagrass Hay Yield 2010 (Equal splits, 4 applications, 300 lbs N/ac total)

21 Summary of EE N products Agrotain Treated Urea as compared to urea applied in the same way (averaged over 4 site-yrs): Reduced ammonia volatilization by over 63%. Produced 11% more forage yield. Recovered 19% more of the applied N. Did not substantially affect crude protein content. Did not substantially affect the risk of nitrate toxicity.

22 Another Fertilization Trick Split Your Potassium Applications! 40-50% in the Spring 50-60% in mid – late season

23 Poor Stress Tolerance Leafspot Diseases The Stand is Gone! Not Competitive Grows Very Slow Poor Winterhardiness K is for Persistence

24 K is the Key to a Good Stand

25 Low Soil pH

26 Aluminum Toxicity – Low Soil pH Alfalfa control treated

27 Effect of Gypsum (CaSO 4 ) on Root Growth - Alfalfa Source: Dr. M.E. Sumner

28 Tissue Sampling and Troubleshooting

29 Tissue Sampling 6 in.

30 Troubleshooting

31 Which is the better hay?

32

33 Chlorophyll and Nutrient Mg N H C O

34 Foliar Fertilizer Applications Even if the product is 100% efficient (likely isn’t) The most a plant can take up across via the leaves is the equivalent of 1-2 lbs/acre of the nutrient  Works for many micro-nutrients (small quantities needed)  Not feasible for macro-nutrients without multiple applications. (large quantities needed) Even if the product is 100% efficient (likely isn’t) The most a plant can take up across via the leaves is the equivalent of 1-2 lbs/acre of the nutrient  Works for many micro-nutrients (small quantities needed)  Not feasible for macro-nutrients without multiple applications. (large quantities needed)

35 www.georgiaforages.com


Download ppt "Annual Nutrient Removal by the Primary Hay Crops in the South Adapted from Southern Forages, 2007 and Myer et al, 2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google