1. Chapter 4

2.  Crime- harm not only specific individuals but also the general welfare  Tort- private wrong committed by one person against another  Intentional Tort-when a person who commits an unintentional tort does not have this mental determination

3.  Assault- threatening to strike or harm with a weapon or physical movement resulting in fear  Battery- Unlawful, unprivileged touching of another person  Trespass- Wrongful injury or interference with the property of another

4.  Nuisance- Anything that interferes with the enjoyment of life or property  Interference with contractual relations- Intentionally causing one person to break or refrain from entering a contract with another  Deceit- False statement or deceptive practice done with intent to injure another

5.  Conversion- Unauthorized taking or borrowing of personal property of another for the use of the taker  False Imprisonment(false arrest)- unlawful restraint of a person, whether in prison or otherwise  Defamation- Wrongful act of injuring another’s reputation by making false statements(libel & slander)  Libel- false statement in written or print  Slander- false statement orally to a 3 rd party

6.  Invasion of privacy- Interference with a person’s right to be left alone  Misuse of legal procedure- Bringing of legal action with malice and without probable cause  Infliction of emotional distress- Intentionally or recklessly causing emotional or mental suffering to others

7.  Negligence- Injury that is caused by a person’s mere carelessness  Strict Liability- injury caused by an individual’s participation in ultra hazardous activity  Breech of duty- the duty to care towards a person or company and fail to live up to that standard (Reasonable Person Test)

8.  Proximate cause- legal connection between unreasonable conduct and the resulting harm  Contributory negligence- behavior by the plaintiff that helps cause his or her injuries may fall under this doctrine

9.  Comparative negligence- the negligence of each party are compared and the amount of the plaintiff’s recovery is reduced by the % of his or her negligence.  Assumption of risk- If the defendant can show the plaintiff knew of the risk involved and still took the chance of being injured he or she may claim this as a defense