1. Commodity Exchange Act Exemption Status Mark Ruane ERCOT Vice President of Credit and Enterprise Risk Management November 3 rd 2011 ERCOT Public

2. 2 2. Commodity Exchange Act Exemption Expected CFTC Conditions for CEA Exemption November 3 rd 2011Finance and Audit Committee ItemStatusEstimated Costs 1.1. Two-day limit to cure collateral calls No action necessary.NA 2.2. Elimination of unsecured credit in CRR market NPRR 400 (approved by Board in October; implementation once system changes are complete) $230k - $255k 3.3. Disallowance of netting between CRR and non- CRR markets 4.4. Reduce settlement timeline NPRR 347 combines invoices for day-ahead and real time markets (approved by Board in August). Note that NPRR 347 was introduced independently of CFTC compliance. NPRR 391 shortens settlement cycle by one day and eliminates Automated Clearing House (ACH) payments (approved by Board in October). NPRR 457: $430k - $460k NPRR 391: NA 5.5. $50m limitation on unsecured credit Revision to Creditworthiness Standard approved by CWG on August 4 th. Approved by Board in October effective December 31 st. NA 6.6. Criteria for market participation NPRR to be drafted as scope finalized.TBD. There will be costs associated with implementation of a verification program. 7.7. Become a central counterparty (CCP) Request for IRS letter ruling to confirm tax-exempt status of CCP is pending.None

3. 3 2. Commodity Exchange Act Exemption Market Participant Risk Management Capability Verification Participants and ISO/RTOs have expressed interest in developing common risk management standards and processes for use in all markets. –ERCOT supports harmonization but this will depend on the outcomes of stakeholder processes. ERCOT staff are working with counterparts at other ISO/RTOS to develop common approaches to participant standards and verification processes. The CCRO has a group working on development of risk management standards. ERCOT staff are providing input to the work group but the outcome will not be binding on ERCOT or other ISO/RTOs. October 17th 2011Finance and Audit Committee

4. 4 What should be verified The immediate priority is development of risk management standards. ISO/RTOs differ on whether scope of “verification” required by FERC requires verification or audit of implementation of risk management capabilities. A requirement to verify implementation will necessitate a narrower definition of risk management capabilities. 2. Commodity Exchange Act Exemption Market Participant Risk Management Capability Verification October 17th 2011Finance and Audit Committee

5. 5 2. Commodity Exchange Act Exemption Market Participant Risk Management Capability Verification How should verification be done ISOs are looking into the possibility of contracting the verification process out to one or more third parties. –Ideally, each CP would have only one review that would be good for all ISO markets (e.g. passport) Logistical issues are being reviewed to determine feasibility Regardless of whether or not a third party is used, ERCOT will maintain ‘ownership’ of the results. –If a third party is used, ERCOT will likely provide a final review and determination of adequacy for the ERCOT market Finance and Audit CommitteeMay 16, 2011

6. 6 2. Commodity Exchange Act Exemption Market Participant Risk Management Capability Verification Who should be subject to verification –All Counter-Parties must complete certification and –All Counter-Parties will be subject to verification process All CPs above “x” size/activity Sampling of CPs below “x” size/activity Finance and Audit CommitteeMay 16, 2011