Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Low-Power Wake-Up Receiver (LP-WUR) for

Published byRandall Daniels Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Low-Power Wake-Up Receiver (LP-WUR) for"— Presentation transcript:

1 Low-Power Wake-Up Receiver (LP-WUR) for 802.11
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2015 Low-Power Wake-Up Receiver (LP-WUR) for Date: Authors: Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation John Doe, Some Company

2 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2015 Abstract This presentation introduces a low-power wake-up receiver (LP-WUR) design that enables low power consumption and low latency for Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation John Doe, Some Company

3 Problem: Escaping the Duty-Cycle Trap
November 2015 Problem: Escaping the Duty-Cycle Trap With duty-cycled operation, low power consumption and low latency are conflicting goals To increase battery life, a device needs to sleep more  increased latency To receive data with low latency, a device needs to sleep less  shorter battery life Goal Low latency (but short battery life) Sleep less battery life Sleep more Long battery life (but long latency) latency Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

4 Problem: Internet-of-Things (IoT) Use Case
November 2015 Problem: Internet-of-Things (IoT) Use Case Today without LP-WUR User cannot access the IoT device while the IoT device is off to save power Internet Waits until IoT device wakes up (worst case = 1 hour) Access Point Access Point command User IoT device Configuration change command (e.g. collect data every 10 min) ON OFF (wakes up every 1 hour) Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

5 November 2015 Solution: Low-Power Wake-Up Receiver (LP-WUR) as Companion Radio for Comm. Subsystem = Main radio (802.11) + LP-WUR Main radio (802.11): for user data transmission and reception Main radio is off unless there is something to transmit LP-WUR wakes up the main radio when there is a packet to receive User data is transmitted and received by the main radio LP-WUR: not for user data; serves as a simple “wake-up” receiver for the main radio LP-WUR is a simple receiver (doesn’t have a transmitter) Active while the main radio is off Target power consumption < 100 µW in the active state Simple modulation scheme such as On-Off-Keying (OOK) Narrow bandwidth (e.g. < 5 MHz) Target transmission range: LP-WUR = Today’s Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

6 Design and Operation of LP-WUR
November 2015 Design and Operation of LP-WUR Transmission range or Data Packet = LP-WUR Transmitter Receiver 802.11 802.11 802.11 802.11 OFF ON OFF ON + Wake-up Packet 802.11 Wake-up signal Wake-up Packet LP-WUR ON Extremely low power receiver design (< 100 uW) - Small and simple OOK demodulator preamble for coexistence Use L-SIG to protect the packet This is for 3rd party legacy stations This is not decoded by LP-WUR (L-SIG: legacy SIGNAL field) Payload modulated with On-Off Keying (OOK) Payload = [Wakeup preamble | MAC header (Receiver address) | Frame body | FCS] OOK modulation can be done using OFDM transmitter with modification (OFDM: orthogonal frequency division multiplexing; FCS: frame check sequence) Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

7 IoT Use Case Proposed scheme using LP-WUR
November 2015 IoT Use Case Proposed scheme using LP-WUR User can access the IoT device with low latency and the IoT device can have long battery life Internet Access Point Access Point Wake-up Packet command User IoT Device Configuration change command (e.g. collect data every 10 min) ON OFF (wakes up every 1 hour) Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

8 LP-WUR Designs from University and Industry
November 2015 LP-WUR Designs from University and Industry Publications Frequency (GHz) Modulation Power (µW) Sensitivity (dBm) Rate (kbps) Tech CMOS (nm) Active area (mm2) CICC [2007] – UC Berkeley 1.9 OOK 65 -50 40 90 0.16 ISSCC [2008] – UC Berkeley 2 52 -72 100 0.1 VLSI[2014] – Panasonic 0.925 OOK/FSK* 45.5 -87 50 1.27 JSSC[2014] - IMEC 123 -86 10 *) FSK: frequency-shift keying References: CICC [2007] : N. Pletcher, S. Gambini, and J. Rabaey, “A 65μW, 1.9 GHz RF to Digital Baseband Wakeup Receiver for Wireless Sensor Nodes,” IEEE Custom Integration Circuits Conference (CICC), 2007. ISSCC [2008]: N. Pletcher, S. Gambini, and J. Rabaey, “A 2 GHz 52 μW Wake-Up Receiver with -72 dBm Sensitivity Using Uncertain-IF Architecture,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2008. VLSI [2014]: T. Abe, and et. al., “An Ultra-Low-Power 2-step Wake-Up Receiver for IEEE g Wireless Sensor Networks”, Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers,” 2014. JSSC[2014]: X. Huang, and et. al., “A MHz, μW Power-Scalable Synchronized-Switching OOK Receiver for Wireless Event-Driven Applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol.49, No.5, May 2014. Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

9 Usage Model 1: Quick Message/Incoming Call Notification Scenario
November 2015 Usage Model 1: Quick Message/Incoming Call Notification Scenario (1) Without LP-WUR (2) With LP-WUR Internet Internet AP buffers data until the client wakes up message or message message message + Wake-up packet Sleep/wake periodically or or Sleep until wake-up packet is received 802.11 Main radio needs to wake up periodically to receive a notification within a latency requirement LP-WUR Wake-up upon reception of wake-up packet and receive message Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

10 November 2015 Usage Model 2: Quick Status Query/Report, Configuration Change Scenario (1) Without LP-WUR (2) With LP-WUR Internet AP buffers data until the IOT device wakes up Internet Configuration change command Status query command Configuration change command Status query command or Status query command or AP AP Status query command + Status report Wake-up packet Sleep/wake periodically Sleep IOT device 802.11 IOT device LP-WUR Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

11 Comparisons: Legacy 802.11 Power Save Modes versus LP-WUR
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2015 Comparisons: Legacy Power Save Modes versus LP-WUR Scenario: data packet interval > polling interval (=latency requirement) Legacy power save modes (1) PS-Poll: STA wakes up periodically to receive beacon frames to see if there is data to receive (2) U-APSD: STA wakes up periodically and transmits a trigger frame to see if there is data to receive (3) Target Wake Time (TWT): AP/STA schedules a next target wake time during the current packet exchange (4) Proposed LP-WUR: doesn’t need to receive beacons nor transmit triggering frames nor schedule TWT (5) Proposed LP-WUR with scheduling: consumes even less power by waking up at scheduled times (e.g. TWT) Proposed LP-WUR 2mS (U-APSD: unscheduled automatic power save delivery) Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation John Doe, Some Company

12 TGax Power Consumption Model
November 2015 TGax Power Consumption Model Doc /1444r2 [C. Yu, MediaTek] Doc /1100r2 [C. Ghosh, Intel] Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

13 Comparison Using TGax Power Consumption Model
November 2015 Comparison Using TGax Power Consumption Model Latency requirement: 100mS Parameters Values Wake-up packet length 500 µS LP-WUR power consumption in active state 100 µW LP-WUR active time duration 2 mS Channel access delay 1.5 mS PHY rate (data/control) 6.5 Mbps Data packet size 238 bytes Beacon/polling interval 100 mS Legacy power save modes 1.6 mW ~15x LP-WUR always on 105 µW ~224x LP-WUR duty-cycled (2 mS active every 100 mS) 7 µW Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

14 November 2015 Comparison Summary LP-WUR shows significant power saving over legacy power save modes Power saving gain : 7x latency)~224x latency) LP-WUR enables a long battery life and low latency with a small battery Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

15 Overview of LP-WUR for 802.11 November 2015
[Wake-up packet transmitter] (1) Transmit a wake-up packet [Wake-up packet design] (1) Designed to coexist with (2) Simple modulation scheme (OOK) for low power receiver design (3) New packet format design [LP-WUR receiver design] Small and simple OOK demodulator – only decodes OOK modulated payload Active power consumption < 100 uW Meet receiver performance requirements: e.g. minimum sensitivity = -82dBm (MCS0), PER<=10% Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

16 Comparison between LP-WUR and LRLP
November 2015 Comparison between LP-WUR and LRLP LP-WUR LRLP (long-range low-power) User data transmission and reception LP-WUR wakes up the radio when it receives a wake-up packet User data is transmitted and received by the radio User data is transmitted and received by a new LRLP PHY/MAC Metrics Average power consumption Latency Data transmission rate Peak/average power consumption Transmission range Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

17 November 2015 Summary Today’s makes trade-offs between low power consumption and low latency The proposed LP-WUR technique can enable low power consumption and low latency at the same time A simple modulation scheme such as OOK can enable a low power receiver design Our study shows significant gain can be achieved using LP-WUR over legacy power save modes Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

18 November 2015 Straw Poll Do you support the basic concept of the LP-WUR technique in this presentation for standardization in the WG? Y: 65 N: 1 A: 51 Minyoung Park, Intel Corporation

Download ppt "Low-Power Wake-Up Receiver (LP-WUR) for"

Similar presentations

MAC Header Compression

MAC Header Compression
Sleep States in IEEE ax Simulation Scenarios

Sleep States in IEEE ax Simulation Scenarios
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0306r3 March 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Power Save Mode Calibration Results Date: 2015-03-09 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0306r3 March 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Power Save Mode Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0068r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, NEWRACOM January 2015 Support of Outdoor Environments Date: 2015-01-12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0068r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, NEWRACOM January 2015 Support of Outdoor Environments Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: 2014-11-03 Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: 2014-09-11 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission October 2011 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/1517r0 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient Device and Service Discovery for Peer-to-Peer (P2P)

Submission October 2011 doc.:IEEE /1517r0 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient Device and Service Discovery for Peer-to-Peer (P2P)
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1444r1 November 2014 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Energy Efficiency Evaluation and Simulation Model Date: 2014-10-01.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1444r1 November 2014 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Energy Efficiency Evaluation and Simulation Model Date:
Submission Jan 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/69r2 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for 802.11ah Power Save Date: 2012-01-19 Authors:

Submission Jan 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/69r2 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/1268r0 Submission November 2010 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Consumption Opportunity in Sub 1 GHz Date: 2010-11-08.

Doc.: IEEE /1268r0 Submission November 2010 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Consumption Opportunity in Sub 1 GHz Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0060r1 Submission January 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Capability Support for 802.11ah Date: 2011-01-17 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0060r1 Submission January 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Capability Support for ah Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE 802.11-12/0129r3 May 2012 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:

Doc.:IEEE /0129r3 May 2012 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1108r0 Technical Feasibility for LRLP September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, IntelSlide 1 Date: 2015-09-14 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1108r0 Technical Feasibility for LRLP September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, IntelSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1112r1 Use Case of LRLP Operation for IoT September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, IntelSlide 1 Date: 2015-09-14 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1112r1 Use Case of LRLP Operation for IoT September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, IntelSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: 2012-09-17 Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1100r2 September 2015 Slide 1 Chittabrata Ghosh, Intel Discussion on Deep and Shallow Sleep States Date: 2015-09-14 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1100r2 September 2015 Slide 1 Chittabrata Ghosh, Intel Discussion on Deep and Shallow Sleep States Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0890r0 July 2012 Fei Tong, CSRSlide 1 802.11ah Multi-User Aggregation PDU Date: 2012-July-16 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0890r0 July 2012 Fei Tong, CSRSlide ah Multi-User Aggregation PDU Date: 2012-July-16 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/1230r1 Submission 802.11ah Channel Access Improvement Date: 2012-05-14 Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1230r1 Submission ah Channel Access Improvement Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1134r2 September 2015 11ax Support for IoT Date: 2015-09-09 Slide 1Shimi Shilo, Huawei Technologies Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1134r2 September ax Support for IoT Date: Slide 1Shimi Shilo, Huawei Technologies Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .

Similar presentations

Ads by Google