1. © 2005 by The Guilford Press Check In, Check Out (CICO) Piloting A Tier 2 Intervention

2. © 2005 by The Guilford Press

3. Townsend Data 18% of your students received 3+ referrals since the beginning of the year. These students were responsible for 309 referrals out of the 421 so far this year That mean less than 18% of your students are responsible for 73% of your referrals. Are office referrals alone effective in improving the behavior of the 18%? Can Tier 1 practices be improved to reach more students?

4. Student Recommended for CICO CICO Implemented Parent Feedback Regular Teacher Feedback Afternoon Check-Out Morning Check-In CICO Coordinator Summarizes Data for Decision Making 2 x Month CICO Meeting to Assess Student Progress Exit Program Revise Program

5. Hartford Hawk’s WINGS Club “What I Need to Grow & be Successful” Expectatio ns Block 1Block 2Block 3LunchBlock 4Block 5 Be Safe3 2 1 Be Responsible 3 2 1 Be Respectful 3 2 1 Parent Signature__________________________________

6. © 2005 by The Guilford Press Expectations for Teachers (Similar to Students on Contracts) Greet student Provide feedback at predetermined times – Rate behavior on the daily progress report – Explain rating to student Prompt appropriate behavior – “Tomorrow, let’s work on….”

7. © 2005 by The Guilford Press Role of CICO Staff Check in with student at the beginning of the day (60 – 90 seconds)  Check for the return of their signed form.  Give them a new form, pointing out goal  Give encouragement Check out at the end of the day. Record points/percentages on excel.

8. © 2005 by The Guilford Press CICO Pilot Will select up to 10 students to pilot the program this year Teachers can nominate up to 2 students Tier 2 team will also consider incident referral and time out data Tier 2 Team will choose students they feel can most benefit from Tier 2 intervention.

9. © 2005 by The Guilford Press Critical Features of CICO Intervention is continuously available Rapid access to intervention (72 hr) Low effort by teachers Positive system of support – Students agree to participate Implemented by all staff/faculty in a school Adequate resources allocated (admin, team) – Twice-monthly meeting, coordinator, reinforcers Continuous monitoring for decision making