1. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 LCLS BCR Overview and EIR LOIs Project Progress / Status Revised Project Baseline Overview EIR Lines of Inquiry (LOIs) Summary Mark Reichanadter LCLS Deputy Project Director

2. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 2 Progress to Date LCLS Status on Approved Baseline (May05) TPC $379M (TEC $315M, OPC $64M) % Comp (Jun07): Planned: 60.1% Actual: 51.5% LCLS Status @ Level 2 Injector TEC & OPC essentially complete. Linac recovering from CR effects. Installing equipment. Undulator accepting deliverables. Prep for installation XTOD has a mature design. Procurements underway. XES in design, planning procurements Conventional Facilities in construction Injector S20 Facilities, MMF in operations Most remaining civil work under contract FEH Hutches, Office space renovation still in design

3. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 3 LCLS Progress on Approved Baseline TEC SPI = 0.85 TEC CPI = 0.90 EAC up-trend BCWP down- trend, due to CR $ total burn rate ~$7-8M per/mo SLAC labor portion burns ~ $2.5M/mo

4. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 4 LCLS TEC Earned Value (through Jun07) % contingency/ETC dropped from ~22% to 10.9% since Oct06 due to CR and funding uncertainties. Project team working on unplanned work (CR scenarios, replanning project, review preparation, etc.) Cum Work Scheduled (BCWS) $183.8M Cum Work Performed (BCWP) $157.0M Cum Actual Costs (ACWP) $174.1M Estimate at Complete (EAC)$302.3M % Contingency on EAC 10.9%

5. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 5 Funding Uncertainty Possible year-long CR No funding restoration until FY09 Continuing Resolution AASSOONNDDJJFFMMAAMMJJJJAASS 20062006 2007 2007 LCLS funded incrementally at ~$86M level. FY07 planned funding $122M Budget passed. LCLS funded at $114M level DOE directs LCLS to revise baseline plan. Funds arrive at ANL CR Funding Uncertainty Time-Line Hold on all LCLS Procurements

6. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 6 CR Impacts and Mitigation Actions Impact: FY07 funding uncertainties for six months $8M FY07 funding reduction, no restoration until FY09 Mitigation: Directed to develop revised plan with reduced FY07 funding profile. Defer selected procurements from FY07 to FY09. Accelerate shutdown procurements to recover schedule Cost: $41.0M Project extended by 16 months Staffing costs, no changes to scope Project is funding limited in FY08

7. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 7 Beam Transport Hall Defer Photon equipment and FEH hutches until FY09 CD-4 LCLS Operations in FEH - July 2010 Mitigation – Defer Procurements and Replan Far Experimental Hall Undulator Hall Near Experimental Hall X-Ray Transport Tunnel

8. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 8 Revised Baseline Plan Revise LCLS baseline to deliver technical scope on cost and on schedule Address effects of the CR and FY07 funding reduction Shift photon and FEH procurements from FY07 to FY09 Update remaining work (ETC) using current estimates No changes in scope or technical capabilities Update overhead rates and escalation Update OPC to reflect LCLS transition to operations Update cost/schedule contingencies and risk planning

9. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 9 Revised Baseline Plan Development Status baseline Primavera (P3) for M/E June 2007. Update FY07 funding. Replan remaining work. Review WBS Dictionary, update as necessary. Update costs and schedule estimates for ETC. Update schedule logic, durations and optimize float Review/adjust obligations plan to fit funding, resources Identify critical paths, update milestones as necessary Re-assess contingency at the task level Re-assess risks, handling plans and impacts. Establish funding levels for FY09 and FY10

10. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 10 Bottoms-Up Contingency Assessment Contingency assessed on the base cost by CAMs at lowest activity. Design Maturity Judgment Factor For more info on cost and schedule estimating, see PMD 1.1-020, and PMD 1.1-021

11. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 11 Revised ETC, BAC @ L2

12. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 12 Basis of Estimate on Remaining Work (TEC) Significant portion of ETC is contracts in hand. Reduce cost risk.

13. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 13 Updated L2 milestones L2 milestones have 2 months float to ‘early finish’ date to allow some replanning discretion in response to changing conditions.

14. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 14 Revised TEC Funding & Obligations

15. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 15 EIR Lines of Inquiry Work Breakdown Structure LCLS is organized into fully integrated (design through commissioning) L2 systems Controls embedded in technical systems. No significant change to WBS Structure or Dictionary due to CR effects. Breakout Session (Fornek) Resource-Loaded Schedule P3 file provided in advance documentation. Presentation (Mast)

16. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 16 EIR Lines of Inquiry Key Technical, Cost, Schedule and Programmatic Assumptions See documentation provided Breakout Session (Mast/Reichanadter) Critical Path 101 days (~5months) of float to CD-4 3 shortest (critical) paths are provided in advance documentation Breakout Session (Mast/Chan)

17. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 17 EIR Lines of Inquiry Start-Up Test (Commissioning) Plan LCLS uses a broad, global start-up plan as a blueprint to commission the LCLS. Detailed commissioning plans are prepared, reviewed (externally) and approved by SLAC and DOE management. DOE Accelerator Safety Order requirements are addressed in detailed commissioning plans Injector Commissioning Complete Linac ARR due in late FY08 BTH–FEH ARR due in Spring 09 Breakout Session (Saenz/Schultz/Arthur)

18. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 18 EIR Lines of Inquiry System Functions and Requirements (SFRs) Technical specifications are arranged in a hierarchical fashion from the LCLS GRD GRD, PRDs, ESD, ICD, RDSs Documents are added/ revised as the design evolves. Technical specifications are under revision control and configuration management No significant change to SFRs due to CR Breakout Talk (Marsh/Reichanadter) Integrated Project Team See responses provided in Advance Questions Breakout Session (Lee/Joma/Brown/Galayda/Reichanadter)

19. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 19 EIR Lines of Inquiry Risk Management System Managers ‘own’ and manage project risks Add/close risks, evaluate handling plans, assess impacts Review monthly with senior management team. Residual risk impacts are evaluated as part of the overall contingency analysis As the project has evolved, risk management has adapted to an punch list of actionable items. Presentation (Galayda), Breakout Session (ALL) Project Execution Plan (PEP) See documentation provided Breakout Session (Lee/Joma)

20. Mark Reichanadter LCLS EIRreich@slac.stanford.edu October 9-11, 2007 20 Summary FY07 CR significantly impacted the LCLS project. 2 quarter CR during project’s peak funding year FY07 funding reduction with earliest restoration in FY09 Directed change to revise cost and schedule baseline LCLS has prepared a revised ETC addressing the FY07 funding and CR effects Reschedule FY07 procurements to FY09 Delay CD-4 (16mo extension to project). TPC = $420M Revised ETC will allow the project to complete its commitments to DOE No changes to scope or technical capabilities Cost/schedule contingency adequate to complete project