Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Routine Preventive Care and Cancer Surveillance in Long-Term Survivors (LTS) of Colorectal Cancer: Results from NSABP Protocol LTS-01 Hiroko Kunitake MD.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Routine Preventive Care and Cancer Surveillance in Long-Term Survivors (LTS) of Colorectal Cancer: Results from NSABP Protocol LTS-01 Hiroko Kunitake MD."— Presentation transcript:

1 Routine Preventive Care and Cancer Surveillance in Long-Term Survivors (LTS) of Colorectal Cancer: Results from NSABP Protocol LTS-01 Hiroko Kunitake MD 1, Ping Zheng MD MS 2, Greg Yothers PhD 2, Stephanie Land PhD 2 Louis Fehrenbacher MD 3, Jeffrey Giguere MD 4, D.Lawrence Wickerham MD 2 Patricia A. Ganz MD 1, Clifford Y. Ko MD MSHS 1 1 David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; 2 NSABP Operations and Biostatistics Center, University of Pittsburgh; 3 Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Vallejo, CA 4 Cancer Center of the Carolinas

2 Disclosures We have no disclosures

3 Long-Term Survivors Growing population of Long-Term Survivors (LTS) of Colorectal Cancer  10% of 11.1 million cancer survivors in US Little known about LTS use of:  Routine Preventive Care  Cancer Screening  Cancer Surveillance

4 How do you identify LTS? Difficulty in gathering consistent LTS study cohort Previous studies used Cancer Registries Possibility of gathering study cohort from Colorectal cancer clinical trials

5 NSABP LTS-01 Study Recruited LTS patients from five NSABP adjuvant therapy trials  Colon cancer: C-05, C-06, C-07  Rectal cancer: R-02, R-03 Aims of LTS-01: Characterize LTS  Quality of Life  Functional Outcomes  Clinical Symptoms  Health Behaviors  Routine Preventive Care  Cancer Screening  Cancer Surveillance

6 Aims 1.Characterize LTS-01 Routine Preventive Care  Comparison with non-cancer general population 2.Determine LTS-01 rates of Cancer Screening  Comparison with non-cancer general population 3.Evaluate LTS-01 Cancer Surveillance

7 Methods LTS-01 Cohort  Recruited from 60 NSABP study sites  Participated in C-05, C-06, C-07, R-02, R-03  5+ year survival  Received computer assisted telephone interview (CATI)

8 NSABP Participating Sites Methods

9 LTS-01 Cohort  Recruited from 60 NSABP study sites  Participated in C-05, C-06, C-07, R-02, R-03  5+ year survival  Received computer assisted telephone interview (CATI)

10 Years of Treatment Trial Accrual C-07 Methods

11 LTS-01 Cohort  Recruited from 60 NSABP study sites  Participated in C-05, C-06, C-07, R-02, R-03  5+ year survival  Received computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) Control non-cancer cohort National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2005  3:1 case-matched  Matched on age, gender, race, education

12 Analysis 1.Routine Preventive Care of LTS-01 and NHIS  Usual Source of Care, ER visits, Flu shot 2.Cancer Screening of LTS-01 and NHIS  Mammogram, Pap smear, PSA test 3. Cancer Surveillance of LTS-01 patients  Colonoscopy, CEA test, CT scan Methods

13 Analysis Comparison of LTS-01 and NHIS samples: Fisher’s Exact Test Predictors of Receipt of Care: Logistic Regression Models  Routine Preventive Care  Cancer Screening  Cancer Surveillance Methods

14 LTS-01 Recruitment Results Total eligible patients 2,408 Patients contacted 976 Patients not interested 232 Did not complete interview 36 Completed interview 708 Patients interested 744

15 LTS-01 Recruitment Results Total eligible patients 2,408 Patients contacted 976 Patients not interested 232 Did not complete interview 36 Completed interview 708 Patients interested 744

16 LTS-01 Participants Colon cancer trials Patients  C-05 147  C-06 180  C-07 354 Rectal cancer trials  R-02 15  R-03 12 Total: 708 patients

17 LTS-01 Participation Rates

18 Demographics Variables LTS-01 N= 708 NHIS N= 2124 Gender Male57.1% Age (in years) <50 50-59 60-69 ≥70 7.3% 19.8% 32.1% 40.8% 7.3% 19.8% 32.1% 40.8% Race Black Other 2.7% 97.3% 2.7% 97.3% Hispanic Yes No 3.8% 96.2% 10.2% 89.8%

19 Demographics Variables LTS-01 N= 708 NHIS N= 2124 p-value Education Less than high school High school graduate College Post graduate 6.2% 53.5% 21.8% 18.5% 21.1% 38.7% 22.0% 18.3% <0.0001 Married75.9%54.6%<0.0001 Health insurance99.0%93.3%<0.0001 Private insurance76.1%66.5%<0.0001

20 LTS-01 and NHIS Comorbidities

21 Health Behaviors Health Behavior LTS-01 N= 708 NHIS N= 2124 p-value Have a usual source of care97.7%93.8%<0.0001 ER visits in past 12 months None One Two or more 78.0% 14.4% 7.6% 80.6% 13.7% 5.7% 0.1619 Had flu shot in past 12 months67.5%44.3%<0.0001

22 Factors associated with Usual Source of Care PredictorsOdds Ratio 95% Wald Confidence Limits p-value Health insurance 7.554.47 to 12.73< 0.0001 Diabetes 6.702.42 to 18.530.0002 Private insurance 2.111.35 to 3.310.0010 LTS-01 1.791.04 to 3.090.0369 Age 1.331.10 to 1.620.0039 Male 0.670.46 to 0.970.0328

23 Factors Associated with Flu Shot PredictorsOdds Ratio 95% Wald Confidence Limits p-value Health Insurance 2.991.84 to 4.85<0.0001 LTS-01 2.882.35 to 3.53<0.0001 Age 2.322.10 to 2.57<0.0001 Diabetes 2.231.74 to 2.86<0.0001 Heart disease1.761.36 to 2.28<0.0001 Lung disease 1.521.18 to 1.960.0011 Education 1.141.04 to 1.250.0040 Male 0.740.63 to 0.890.0009 Hispanic 0.670.49 to 0.920.0140

24 Cancer Screening Screening TestLTS-01NHIS p-value PAP smear in past 12 months* 67.3% 54.8% <0.0001 Mammogram in past 12 months* 84.4%70.7% <0.0001 PSA test in past 12 months# 84.5%74.5% <0.0001 * Women only # Men only

25 LTS-01 Cancer Surveillance Surveillance TestPercent Colonoscopy In last 2 years In last 5 years 74.1% 96.5% Carcinoembryonic Antigen Test In last 2 years In last 5 years 71.8% 88.0% Computed Tomography Scan In last 2 years In last 5 years 43.9% 66.4%

26 LTS-01 Cancer Surveillance and Survivorship

27 Summary LTS-01 patients  More usual source of care  Higher rates of flu shot  More cancer screening  High rates of cancer surveillance Highly motivated LTS-01 patients

28 Limitations Selective participation of LTS-01 patients Variation in length of survival among cancer trials Nationally representative sample of CRC survivors Ability to link cancer treatment to late effects Strengths

29 Implications Clinical trials as a source of long-term survivor information Further results of LTS-01 patient-reported outcomes to follow

30

31 Extra slides

32 Factors Associated with ER Use PredictorsOdds Ratio 95% Wald Confidence Limits p-value LTS-01 1.180.95 to 1.470.1298 Education 0.870.79 to 0.950.0037 Heart Disease 1.401.09 to 1.800.0079 Stroke 1.921.39 to 2.65<0.0001 Chronic Lung Disease 1.571.22 to 2.010.0005 Diabetes 1.281.00 to 1.640.0464 Kidney Disease 1.470.99 to 2.170.0573 Bowel Disease 1.611.21 to 2.150.0011

33 Cancer Screening by Age: Pap smear

34 Cancer Screening by Age: Mammogram

35 Cancer Screening by Age: PSA test


Download ppt "Routine Preventive Care and Cancer Surveillance in Long-Term Survivors (LTS) of Colorectal Cancer: Results from NSABP Protocol LTS-01 Hiroko Kunitake MD."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google