Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The role of impact structures in localizing explosive volcanism on a contracting planet: Mercury Rebecca J. Thomas*, Dave A. Rothery, Susan J. Conway,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The role of impact structures in localizing explosive volcanism on a contracting planet: Mercury Rebecca J. Thomas*, Dave A. Rothery, Susan J. Conway,"— Presentation transcript:

1 The role of impact structures in localizing explosive volcanism on a contracting planet: Mercury Rebecca J. Thomas*, Dave A. Rothery, Susan J. Conway, Mahesh Anand The Open University, U.K.

2 European Planetary Science Congress 20152 NASA/JHUAPL/CIW, NASA/Caltech Explosive volcanism & impact structures

3 Impact structures appear to localize explosive volcanism. Questions arising: 1.How? 2.Can explosive volcanism can be used as a marker for ancient basin structures? European Planetary Science Congress 20153

4 1. Localization within impact craters European Planetary Science Congress 20154

5 Lessons from the Moon European Planetary Science Congress 20155 LROC Team

6 A feasible model for Mercury? Compared explosive volcanism in complex impact craters on Mercury (16) and the Moon (15) Where ◦ Presence of pyroclastic deposits is relatively uncontroversial ◦ Available topographic data ◦ Identifiable vents European Planetary Science Congress 20156

7 Findings: Energy of eruption Greater on Mercury: 1.Vent volume 2.Maximum particle range More energetic eruptions Higher volatile content powering eruption (NASA/JHUAPL/CIW) European Planetary Science Congress 20157 Mercury MoonMercury

8 Host crater deformation: Moon All sampled lunar sites are in craters with shallow, fractured floors. European Planetary Science Congress 20158 LROC Team

9 Host crater deformation: Mercury Floors are not shallow, fractured or deformed. No storage? Improbable: ◦ Multiple, closely co-located vents ◦ Large scale of deposits suggests accumulation of volatiles prior to eruption Far left: Multiple vents (-6.4° E, 48.5° S) Left: Widespread deposit (-89.3° E, 21.2° S) (NASA/JHUAPL/CIW) European Planetary Science Congress 20159 NASA/Caltech

10 Why no surface deformation on Mercury? Most probable cause: deeper intrusion due to Mercury’s global compression ◦ Consistent with  Energetic eruptions: chamber stable to greater overpressure  Vents at crater centre European Planetary Science Congress 2015 10

11 Conclusions 1: How? 1. Subsurface magma storage is localized by impact crater structures on Mercury, as on the Moon... 2. …But at greater depths than the Moon due to crustal compression. 3. This gives it distinct characteristics: i.Localization of eruptions at the crater centre. ii.Larger vents and deposits because higher concentrations of volatiles are able to accumulate prior to eruption. European Planetary Science Congress 201511 More detail: Thomas et al. EPSL (in press)

12 2. Explosive volcanism as evidence for ancient impact basins European Planetary Science Congress 201512

13 Fewer large basins than expected European Planetary Science Congress 201513 Fassett et al., JGR: Planets, 2012 Basins: Fassett et al. 2012. Base image: NASA/JHUAPL/CIW

14 Sites of explosive volcanism + European Planetary Science Congress 201514 1. Compositional/spectral evidence for a circular or annular region with a distinct composition (i.e. high Mg/Si, LRM). 2. Tectonic structures forming a ring/s. 3. A circular region of thin crust and/or annulus of thick crust.

15 3 possible basins ≥ 500 km diameter European Planetary Science Congress 201515 Basins: Fassett et al. 2012. Base images: NASA/JHUAPL/CIW

16 ‘B54’ European Planetary Science Congress 201516 Basins: Fassett et al. 2012, base images and spectral data: NASA/JHUAPL/CIW Base image and spectral data: NASA/JHUAPL/CIW, Tectonic structures: Byrne et al. Nature Geoscience, 2014 Smooth plains: Denevi et al. JGR: Planets, 2013

17 Support for HMR basin European Planetary Science Congress 201517 Basins: Fassett et al. 2012, base images and spectral data: NASA/JHUAPL/CIWXRS-derived composition: Weider et al. EPSL, 2015 Spectral data: NASA/JHUAPL/CIW

18 Southern Basin European Planetary Science Congress 201518 Basins: Fassett et al. 2012, base images and spectral data: NASA/JHUAPL/CIW

19 Conclusions 2: Ancient basins European Planetary Science Congress 201519 Aligned sites of explosive volcanism = supplementary evidence for the presence of as many as 3 ≥ 500 km diameter impact basins on Mercury. Reduces the disparity in such basins versus the Moon. A greater degree of resurfacing is implied, rather than a different population of impactors.

20 European Planetary Science Congress 201520 Rebecca.thomas@open.ac.uk Thank you for your attention.


Download ppt "The role of impact structures in localizing explosive volcanism on a contracting planet: Mercury Rebecca J. Thomas*, Dave A. Rothery, Susan J. Conway,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google