1. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI1 Impact of Force Majeure On Contracts Presentation by Mohit Saraf Partner Luthra & Luthra Law Offices

2. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI2 Agenda Basic concept of Force Majeure Doctrine of Frustration distinguished Force Majeure in Commercial Contracts Examples Distinguishing Features Effect of Force Majeure Issues

3. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI3 Basic Concept of Force Majeure Force Majeure –Definition any event or circumstance or combination of events and circumstances which materially and adversely affect the performance of the obligations of either Party to a contract and is not within the reasonable control (directly or indirectly) of the Party affected. –Civil law concept –Foreseeability and fault

4. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI4 Basic Concepts of Force Majeure (Cont’d.) Elements of Force Majeure: –Events or circumstance must be unforseen or unforeseeable at the time of making of contract. –Beyond the control of affected party. –Not caused by any default or negligence of affected party. Common law –Contractual obligation-strict liability –Frustration of contract

5. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI5 Doctrine of Frustration Distinguished Frustration –Performance becomes impossible; –Performance becomes illegal; –Events outside the control of the parties defeat the purpose of the contract Discharges the contract Indian Contract Act –Section 56 –Section 32

6. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI6 Doctrine of Frustration Distinguished (Cont’d.) Section 32 - Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event happens cannot be enforced by law unless and until that event has happened. If the event becomes impossible such contracts become void. Section 56 -An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void. A contract to do an act which, after the contract is made, becomes impossible, or, by reason of some event which the promisor could not prevent, unlawful, becomes void when the act becomes impossible or unlawful……...

7. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI7 Doctrine of Frustration Distinguished (Cont’d.) Satyabrata Ghose Vs. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. AIR 1954 SC 44 Alopi Parshad Vs. Union of India AIR 1960 SC 588 Naihati Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Khyaliram Jagannath AIR 1968 SC 522 Devendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. AIR 1971 SC 1759

8. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI8 Doctrine of Frustration Distinguished (Cont’d.) Section 56 lays down a rule of positive law and does not leave the matter to be determined according to the intention of the parties. Courts can declare frustration only when a change of circumstances occurs which is so fundamental as to be regarded by law as striking at the root of the contract as a whole. Contracts, which contain an implied or express term for the discharge of the contract upon happening of certain circumstances, would be discharged under the terms specified in the contract and covered under Section 32 and would be outside the purview of Section 56 In cases of frustration, performance of the contract comes to an end but the contract would still be in existence for purposes such as the resolution of disputes.

9. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI9 Force Majeure in Commercial Contracts Exception to the normal contractual consequence of breach of contract. Rationale Negotiation –Location of the Project –Legal systems –Political governance Classification –Political Force Majeure ( State/governmental authority not excused) –Non-Political/ Natural Force Majeure

10. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI10 Examples Includes, without limitation : Strikes or other industrial action; War (whether or not declared) or other hostilities (including terrorist action, sabotage, riot or insurrection); Blockage or embargo; Adverse natural phenomena (earthquake, hurricane, storm, fire, flood, volcanic eruption); Epidemic; Change of law or regulation (including a change in the terms of any approval or consent)

11. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI11 Distinguishing Features Impossibility of performance versus “material & adverse effect” Notice/ reporting requirements Onus on affected party Duty to mitigate Excuse only till performance is affected “Including, without limitation”

12. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI12 Effect of Force Majeure Affected party not in breach Suspension of obligations Payment obligations not excused Accrued liabilities not excused Termination after protracted Force Majeure

13. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI13 Effect of Force Majeure (Cont’d.) Concession Agreement –Extension of term –Compensation Supply Agreement –Take or pay liability Construction Contracts –Contractor entitled to extension of time and/ or compensation. –Fixed Price fixed term contract

14. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI14 Issues Adverse effect on party Economic hardship Inconsistent Force Majeure provision among project contracts –breach under one contract e.g. Construction contract providing for extension of time upon occurrence of Force Majeure; same relief must be available in the off- take sales agreement. The result of an inconsistency would be that the project company would be unable to comply with the sales agreement due to delay in completion of the project. Result - payment of damages and/or a terminated sales contract

15. April 19, 2001L&L/MDI15 Issues (Cont’d.) –“Resurrection” Clause To cure inconsistent force majeure provisions Party not to receive relief greater than that available to the other party under associated contracts. –Mitigation Insurance –Political Risk insurance (ECAs & Multilateral Agencies) –Business interruption insurance –All risk insurance –Self insurance Financial Balance