Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

One step forward, two steps back: On the politics of sustainability in the United States Sandy Rikoon University of Missouri

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "One step forward, two steps back: On the politics of sustainability in the United States Sandy Rikoon University of Missouri"— Presentation transcript:

1 One step forward, two steps back: On the politics of sustainability in the United States Sandy Rikoon University of Missouri RikoonSandy@missouri.edu

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 Three Dimensions of Power 1)Protection of subjective interests during direct conflicts over selected issues in public decision-making 2)Confining the scope of decision-making to only those issues that do not seriously challenge one’s subjective interests 3)Avoiding potential conflict by shaping people’s perceptions, beliefs and subjective interests via ideology and propaganda

11

12 The Modernization Project (1950-1980) Dominant political economy Primacy of the state and state-regulated markets (Keynesianism) Public Spending Social goals Social contract and redistribution National citizenship Chief Mechanisms Public investment Import substitution industrialization Education Land reform

13

14 Strategies of manipulation Misrepresenting and manipulating the results of scientific research Misrepresenting and manipulating the results of scientific research Intimidating or threatening individual scientists Intimidating or threatening individual scientists Invoking existing rules or creating new procedures in the political system Invoking existing rules or creating new procedures in the political system invoking an existing bias of bias in the media invoking an existing bias of bias in the media

15

16

17

18 Industrialization Kuznets Curve Kuznets curve - An inverted U curve that shows increases in pollution during early phases of development, peaks at middle stages, and then declines as affluence continues to increase.

19 Does development cure pollution?

20

21

22

23

24 10 Deep Sustainability Principles 1.Seeks the well-being and flourishing of the biological and physical environment (including all species), human livelihoods, and the access to adequate physical resources necessary for all human beings to live healthy lives. 2.Recognizes the diversity of cultural and social lives and the ability of all humans to choose the cultural and social norms relevant to their lives. 3.Requires humans to recognize systems of rights and responsibilities for all peoples.

25 Regulatory MechanismConcept Market Component Role of the State Green TaxesIndividuals or firms participate in “greener” behavior by avoiding more costly “brown” alternatives Incentivized behavior Sets and collects taxes Cap and trade Total amount of pollutant or other “bad” is limited and tradable; rights to pollute are distributed to polluters Rewarding efficiency Sets limits and enforces contracts Green consumption Individual consumers choose goods or services based on their certified environmental impacts, typically paying more for more benign commodities Willingness to pay Oversees and authenticates claims of producers and sellers Three market-based solutions

26

27 10 Deep Sustainability Principles 4.Promotes the principle of equality and the centrality of social justice 5.Promotes mitigation over adaptation, recognizing as well that human behavior is dynamic over time and space. 6.Recognizes solutions must continuously be reviewed and adjusted; adaptive co-management in a key. 7.Promotes a cradle to cradle approach based on the premise that it is the value of natural and human capital that makes a sustainable process.

28 10 Deep Sustainability Principles 8.Values the democratic process and supports democratic governance 9.Recognizes that complex, self-organizing, and living systems depend on their very complexity and internal variety for long term viability. 10.Believes in appreciating quality of life rather than adhering to an increasingly higher standard of living.

29

30

31

32

33

34

35 The social constructions of environmental problems: a “political ecological” approach

36 The Modernization Project (1940-1980?) Mobilizing tool Nationalism (postcolonialism) Institutional developments World Bank, IMF

37 From Development to Globalization The Globalization Project (1990-present) Dominant political economy Self-regulating markets (monetarism) Public/state downsizing Chief Mechanisms Export-orientation Privatization Entrepreneurialism Public austerity

38 The Globalization Project (1990-present) Mobilizing tool Markets and credit Social goals Private initiatives and global consumerism Multi-layered citizenship and recognition Institutional developments NAFTA, WTO SAP (Structural Adjustment Policies)

39 Presenting claims How an issue is “framed” is very important. What/who caused this situation? Is it serious? What are the harms, to humans or other species? Is the problem framed by its symptoms or underlying causes? Who stands to benefit or lose by attention How an issue is “framed” is very important. What/who caused this situation? Is it serious? What are the harms, to humans or other species? Is the problem framed by its symptoms or underlying causes? Who stands to benefit or lose by attention In many cases, what’s as important as the validity of the claim is it’s viability to an audience In many cases, what’s as important as the validity of the claim is it’s viability to an audience

40 Four roles of science (Ozawa) Discoverer – uncovers conditions worthy of public attention; pre-conflict Discoverer – uncovers conditions worthy of public attention; pre-conflict Mechanism of authority – providing the basis of public policy decisions Mechanism of authority – providing the basis of public policy decisions Shield – providing a buffer for unpopular decisions Shield – providing a buffer for unpopular decisions Tool of persuasion – justifying or legitimizing a particular argument/decision Tool of persuasion – justifying or legitimizing a particular argument/decision

41 Success factors Framed as novel and important in the media Framed as novel and important in the media Symbolic and visual dramatization Symbolic and visual dramatization Economic incentives and health outcomes for action Economic incentives and health outcomes for action Institutional sponsor Institutional sponsor

42

43 Ecological footprints suggest we are in a situation of overshoot

44 19611965197019751980198519901995200020052008 Global Population (billion) 3.13.33.74.14.44.85.35.76.16.56.7 Total Ecological Footprint 2.42.52.8 2.62.72.62.52.7 Cropland Footprint1.1 1.00.90.8 0.7 0.6 Grazing Land Footprint 0.4 0.3 0.2 Forest Footprint0.4 0.3 Fishing Ground Footprint 0.1 Carbon Footprint0.30.50.91.01.1 1.2 1.4 Built-up Land0.1 Total Biocapacity3.73.53.12.92.62.42.32.12.01.8 Ecological Footprint to Biocapacity ratio 0.630.730.880.971.061.071.181.241.291.451.51 Ecological footprints, worldwide, 1961-2008


Download ppt "One step forward, two steps back: On the politics of sustainability in the United States Sandy Rikoon University of Missouri"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google