Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group Meeting Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, July 22 nd, 2011 Adil Khan.

Published byPierce Reynolds Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group Meeting Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, July 22 nd, 2011 Adil Khan."— Presentation transcript:

1 ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group Meeting Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, July 22 nd, 2011 Adil Khan

2  For all the points 1,2,4,8,12, 15, 20,30,32 using the Mip constant values extracted at low Temperature.  Temperature Correction also applied  Energy Resolution and Mean are obtained using the Weighted average Method. Energy Resolution (%) σ constant 2.32±0.01 σ stochastic 13.76±0.01 1. ScECAL Linearity & Energy Resolutionc Energy resolution are obtained after fitting :

3 Devaition from Linearity Deviation from the Linear behavior of the measured deposited energy as a function of the beam momentum in case of using Mip constant corrected with low temperature and also Temperature correction

4  For all the points 1,2,4,8,12, 15, 20,30,32 using the Mip constant values extracted at High Temperature.  Temperature Correction also applied  Energy Resolution and Mean are obtained using the Weighted average Method. Energy Resolution (%) σ constant 2.27±0.01 σ stochastic 13.8±0.01 2. ScECAL Linearity & Energy Resolution Energy resolution are obtained after fitting :

5 Devaition from Linearity Deviation from the Linear behavior of the measured deposited energy as a function of the beam momentum in case of using Mip constant corrected with High temperature and also Temperature correction

6 EnergyRun#MeanSigmaMeanErrSigmaErrW.ER(%) 32 GeV5603894305.1167.62.693.23.33 5603904240.9138.50.88 5603914319.06144.60.910.86 30 GeV5603773964.129.80.770.763.30 5603783992.32134.290.710.69 5603793987.1129.221.010.99 20 GeV5602762776.4131.061.862.103.95 5602882711.1106.770.480.47 15 GeV5602902076.190.00.35 4.21 5602912109.285.50.38 12 GeV5602941705.2476.830.300.294.49 5602951686.675.380.520.49 Using Mip Const at High Temperature and Temperature Correction

7 EnergyRun#MeanSigmaMeanErrSigmaErrW.ER(%) 8 GeV5602491095.262.540.2280.2225.33 5602501097.6960.970.460.45 5602521062.574.550.490.48 5603051117.6456.780.2240.220 5603061120.956.570.240.23 5604601109.8456.720.2430.235 4 GeV560321570.2938.180.38 6.92 560330564.2439.50.170.16 560331567.0338.090.320.31 560332567.5539.380.150.14 560461568.839.130.28 560462567.6939.360.180.17

8 EnergyRun#MeanSigmaMeanErrSigmaErrW.ER(%) 2 GeV5603342942.1229.480.120.119.99 560335291.3128.630.160.10 560337291.9029.270.110.10 560471292.8529.340.110.10 1GeV560339145.0921.430.0860.08814.85 560352140.9421.310.17 560360143.4021.330.1630.16 560363144.1621.370.104 560364141.0421.020.0870.086 560366142.020.310.17 Using Mip Const at High Temperature and Temperature Correction

9 EnergyRun#MeanSigmaMeanErrSigmaErrW.ER(%) 32 GeV5603893441.58124.741.842.063.36 5603903391.96112.900.7030.693 5603913454.68116.700.7180.665 30 GeV5603773168.87104.920.6140.5913.33 5603783190.71108.530.5670.543 5603793186.69103.690.7920.772 20 GeV5602762220.4992.351.311.443.94 5602882168.5185.170.3900.384 15 GeV5602901659.8972.070.279 4.21 5602911685.4368.600.3070.300 12 GeV5602941363.4161.350.2430.2344.50 5602951349.0160.870.4200.405 Using Mip Const at Low Temperature and Temperature Correction

10 EnergyRun#MeanSigmaMeanErrSigmaErrW.ER(%) 8 GeV560249857.2749.720.1810.1765.35 560250877.1849.330.3760.368 560252849.0859.380.3830.376 560305894.4345.560.1790.176 560306897.1145.450.1940.188 560460888.7445.680.1970.192 4 GeV560321456.7031.140.3120.3076.95 560330451.5031.800.1370.132 560331453.6830.660.2570.248 560332454.4631.620.1210.116 560461455.5631.530.2250.218 560462454.7131.650.1440.138

11 EnergyRun#MeanSigmaMeanErrSigmaErrW.ER(%) 2 GeV560334235.1423.080.1010.0979.85 560335232.9322.680.1330.129 560337233.4923.110.0950.091 560471234.4023.170.0940.091 1 GeV560339116.0917.190.068 14.91 560352112.7517.030.1390.138 560360114.7617.230.131 560363115.3217.170.083 560364114.8516.810.700.069 560366113.3716.870.2620.259 Using Mip Const at Low Temperature and Temperature Correction

12 Temperature Information for all the MIP Runs of 2009 data Run#Date TimeStart TemperatureEnd Temperature Start timeEnd time1 st 2 nd 1 st 2 nd 560180200905016:178:4624.624.424.324.1 560224200905036:158:1623.5 23.723.5 5602542009050414:1014:5026.426.626.826.9 5602602009050416:0518:0127.327.527.8 560269200905054:216:5425.525.225.124.8 560270200905056:569:2725.124.825.325.2 560271200905059:2910:0325.2 25.425.3 560378200905105:376:5920.119.9 19.6 5605292009051616:3918:2922.3 22.2 5605322009051701:583:1920.219.919.719.4 5605332009051703:194:4819.719.419.319.0 5605622009051816:3218:0122.622.7 5605842009051914:4716:2323.023.123.3 5605862009051916:2716:3823.223.3 23.4 5605882009051916:4317:0923.323.4 Temperature Information for all the MIP Runs of 2009 data

13 Temperature Information for all the Energy Runs of 2009 data EnergyRun #Date TimeStart TemperatureEnd Temperature Start time End time1 st 2 nd 1 GeV 5603392009050816:3518:0224.0 24.2 560352200905094:365:1722.822.622.722.5 5603602009050910:2811:1321.821.621.821.7 5603622009050911:2312:0421.821.721.921.8 5603632009050912:0613:2221.921.822.021.9 5603642009050913:2214:4722.021.922.1 5603662009050915:4215:5122.322.222.3 2 GeV 5603342009050811:4212:4722.9 23.123.2 5603352009050812:5513:4823.2 23.323.4 5603372009050814:1615:3223.423.523.7 560471200905141:583:2022.522.422.322.1

14 Temperature Information for all the Energy Runs of 2009 data EnergyRun #Date TimeStart TemperatureEnd Temperature Start time End time1 st 2 nd 4 GeV 5603212009050715:3415:5123.5 560330200905086:007:1322.522.322.422.2 560331200905087:267:5022.422.222.422.3 560332200905089:2710:4622.622.522.7 5604612009051310:3811:0720.720.520.720.5 5604622009051311:0812:1820.720.520.720.5 8 GeV 560249200905048:3810:0024.424.324.6 5602502009050410:0910:4124.723.624.8 5602522009050411:2612:0325.1 25.425.5 560305200905074:515:5822.021.721.821.6 560306200905075:587:1621.821.621.721.6 560460200905139:0510:1620.720.520.720.5

15 Temperature Information for all the Energy Runs of 2009 data EnergyRun #Date TimeStart TemperatureEnd Temperature Start time End time1 st 2 nd 12 GeV 5602942009050611:5513:0326.3 26.827.0 5602952009050613:0313:2926.827.0 27.2 15 GeV 560290200905068:4610:0325.425.325.6 5602912009050610:0511:0925.6 26.0 20 GeV 5602752009050513:4014:4026.626.727.027.2 5602762009050514:5615:3727.127.327.527.6 560284200905054:015:1926.125.8 25.5 560288200905056:117:0925.625.425.525.2 30GeV 560377200905104:195:3720.420.1 19.9 560378200905105:376:5920.119.9 19.6 560379200905106:597:4319.919.619.819.6 32 GeV 5603902009051011:5313:1821.021.121.621.7 5603912009051013:1814:3821.621.722.122.2 5603892009051011:2911:4820.820.921.021.1

16 BACK UPBACK UP

17

18 Temperature variation During 2009 Beam Test  Higher temperature is due to air conditioner malfunction.  Temperature variation during whole period of Beam test 2009, as we see, two different temperature regions, Higher and lower temperature region separated by a vertical line. The difference is about 5 o C Air Cond. repaired

19 MIP Calibration 2009 MIP Calibration Constant DataMeanRMSRMS/Mean(%) High Temp Peroid09143.727.8719.3 Low Temp Period09178.232.6918.3 2008 Mip Const160.831.3919.5  The average is about 178 ADC counts / MIP using low temperature data Runs.  Calibrate the response of each strip using MIP signal and obtained the MIP constant at two different Temperatures  Distribution of MIP Calibration Constant for 2160 channels CALICE very preliminary

20  After using Temperature Correction Factor, and Mip constant at extracted at low Temperature. Order of calibration constants are used. 1.Temperature Correction 2.Intercalibration correction 3.Saturation correction 4.MIP calibration (for low temperature & High Temperature Period) ScECAL Energy Response 1GeV 2GeV 4GeV 8GeV 12GeV 15GeV 20GeV 30GeV 32GeV

21  For the points 12, 15, and 20 using the Mip constant values for higher Temperature. All runs are used.  For 1,2,4,8,30,32, Low Temperature Mip constant are used.  Temperature Correction also applied  For linearity, the points 12, 15, and 20 Show higher response.  taking the average of Mean for each energy point. 1. ScECAL Linearity& Resolution  Energy Resolution are obtained using the Weighted average Method. Energy Resolution (%) σ constant 2.14±0.27 σ stochastic 14.22±0.28

22  For all the points 1,2,4,8,12, 15, 20,30,32 using the Mip constant values extracted at low Temperature.  Temperature Correction also applied  taking the average of Mean for each energy point.  Energy Resolution are obtained using the Weighted average Method. Energy Resolution (%) σ constant 2.14±0.27 σ stochastic 14.22±0.28 2. ScECAL Linearity & Energy Resolution Energy resolution are obtained after fitting :

23  For all the points 1,2,4,8,12, 15, 20,30,32 using the Mip constant values extracted at High Temperature.  Temperature Correction also applied  taking the average of Mean for each energy point.  Energy Resolution are obtained using the Weighted average Method. 3. ScECAL Linearity & Energy Resolution Energy Resolution (%) σ constant 2.11±0.25 σ stochastic 14.24±0.25 Energy resolution are obtained after fitting :

24 Plan - Check for event Selection - study systematic uncertainty

25 Energy Resolution (%) σ constant 2.44 σ stochastic 13.95 3. ScECAL Linearity & Resolution  Only one run for each point are used  For the points 12, 15, and 20 the Mip constant values for higher Temperature are used.  For 1,2,4,8,30,32, Low Temperature Mip constant are used.  No Temperature Correction applied

Download ppt "ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group Meeting Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, July 22 nd, 2011 Adil Khan."

Similar presentations

US CMS H1/H2 Issues1 H C A L Dan is interested in the calibration of the HCAL for jets. He defines “R” as the measured energy of a pion, probably in ADC.

US CMS H1/H2 Issues1 H C A L Dan is interested in the calibration of the HCAL for jets. He defines “R” as the measured energy of a pion, probably in ADC.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.

Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.

2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.
1 AHCAL answers IDAG Erika Garutti On behalf of AHCAL analysis team.

1 AHCAL answers IDAG Erika Garutti On behalf of AHCAL analysis team.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.

The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Adil Khan Kyungpook National university Korea-Japan Joint ScECAL Group Meeting kobe University Japan 3 rd September 2010.

Adil Khan Kyungpook National university Korea-Japan Joint ScECAL Group Meeting kobe University Japan 3 rd September 2010.
AHCAL Saturation Study CALICE week – Casablanca, Morocco 2010/09/22 Jaroslav Zalesak Institute of Physics, Prague / DESY Study of single SiPM response.

AHCAL Saturation Study CALICE week – Casablanca, Morocco 2010/09/22 Jaroslav Zalesak Institute of Physics, Prague / DESY Study of single SiPM response.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.

Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
1 Calice LCUK Bristol 24/03/09 David Ward WP1 : Test Beam.

1 Calice LCUK Bristol 24/03/09 David Ward WP1 : Test Beam.
Preliminary Results of the Test Run at SLAC Petra Hüntemeyer.

Preliminary Results of the Test Run at SLAC Petra Hüntemeyer.
More on Testbeam Analysis FLZ. Stability Checks for TCMT Pedestal stability already shown by Kurt MIP calibration stability Response stability.

More on Testbeam Analysis FLZ. Stability Checks for TCMT Pedestal stability already shown by Kurt MIP calibration stability Response stability.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome, 21-06-07.

The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Calibration issues for the CALICE 1m 3 AHCAL LCWS11 - International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders Granada, Spain 2011/9/28 Jaroslav Zalesak Institute.

Calibration issues for the CALICE 1m 3 AHCAL LCWS11 - International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders Granada, Spain 2011/9/28 Jaroslav Zalesak Institute.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.

W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group Meeting Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, August 6 th, 2010 Adil Khan, Satoru Uozumi,

ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group Meeting Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, August 6 th, 2010 Adil Khan, Satoru Uozumi,
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.

Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL Adil Khan International Linear Collider Workshop 2010 LCWS10 & ILC10, Beijing, China CALICE Scintillator ECAL group.

The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL Adil Khan International Linear Collider Workshop 2010 LCWS10 & ILC10, Beijing, China CALICE Scintillator ECAL group.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.

The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
Future Beam Test Plans of the GLD Calorimeter Aug-6 2007 学術創成会議 Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu) for the GLD calorimeter group We are planning to have two beam.

Future Beam Test Plans of the GLD Calorimeter Aug 学術創成会議 Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu) for the GLD calorimeter group We are planning to have two beam.
ScECAL. ScECAL in ILD Tungsten  Sensor unit: scintillator strip + MPPC  45 x 5 x 2 mm3 scintillator strip  1.4 x 1.4 x 0.6 mm 3 MPPC near future 

ScECAL. ScECAL in ILD Tungsten  Sensor unit: scintillator strip + MPPC  45 x 5 x 2 mm3 scintillator strip  1.4 x 1.4 x 0.6 mm 3 MPPC near future 

Similar presentations

Ads by Google