1. P. Dupieux (ALICE), A. Cardini (LHCb) M. Abbrescia, K. Hoepfner, A. Safonov (CMS) Ch. Amelung, O. Kortner, S. Veneziano (ATLAS) 4t meeting with the HL-LHC Steering Committee

2. Preliminary issues #1  Defined three main “themes” :  New running conditions and new requirements from physics, consequences for muon detection  System longevity, upgrades foreseen,new detectors and R&D  Electronics (front-end and trigger),trigger algorithms, alignment 2 M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group

3. Preliminary issues #2  Thinking of splitting theme #2 in two talks:  2a. Longevity of the muon systems  2b. Upgrades and new detectors R&D  Agreed with the Tracker PG that MPGD technologies – of interest for both communities - will be dealt here  Dicussion on potential speakers just started  Premature to propose names – will do it before the end of June  Discussion on talk duration just started (depend on split of theme#2) 3 M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group

4. Theme (talk) #1  New running conditions and new requirements from physics, consequences for muon detection  focus on muon detectors requirements from operating conditions after LS2 and the HL-LHC physics program  final integrated luminosity and accumulated radiation, increased instantaneous luminosity, pile-up, etc.  predictions for correlated (beam-induced) and uncorrelated (cavern) background  consequences for detector functioning, required time resolution, and off-line track reconstruction  adequacy or deficiencies of the existing systems performance (extrapolated), and potential improvements  new/better signal/track reconstruction algorithms possible with improved detectors M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 4

5. Theme #2 – one or two talks  System longevity, upgrades foreseen, new detectors and relative R&D  System longevity of the muon systems (talk 2a?)  Muon detector problems after LS2, actions to keep the performance stable, possible improvements using new detectors  Chambers reaching rate limits, high occupancy, high dead time;  Chambers aging due to radiation or accumulated charge  Upgrades with new detectors (talk 2b?)  Replacing old detectors by new ones  Extending muon system coverage with new detectors  R&D for new detector types (including MPGD)  Experimental facilities needed for this R&D M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 5

6. Theme #3  Electronics (front-end and trigger), alignment  effect of increased radiation and higher collision rates on front-end electronics and trigger systems  radiation damage, single-event upsets  readout electronics bandwidth limitations  electronics upgrades  trigger performance, sharpness of trigger threshold, purity  hitting maximum allowed trigger rates  increasing the complexity of low-level trigger algorithms – requiring increased trigger latency  alignment – optical systems and alignment-using-tracks  radiation damage to sensor electronics M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 6

7. ATLAS@theme#1  Basic goals of ATLAS:  Keep muon detection efficiency and momentum resolution at the existing level  Keep muon trigger rates at acceptable level  Assumptions for run IV (after LS3):  =5x10 34 cm -2 s -1, L peak =7x10 34 cm -2 s -1  Up to 200 pile-up events (with a safety factor of ~1.5)  Plan to accumulate 3000 fb -1 of pp collision data. M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 7

8. ATLAS@theme#1  Implications of these operating parameters:  High cavern background:  Highest expected rates in the Small Wheels (innermost endcap wheel, 7m from IP): 15 kHz/cm 2 (r=100 cm from beam line), 100% occupancy in the MDT chambers, and too high for CSC chambers too.  For comparison, highest rates in the Big Wheels (middle endcap wheel, 14m from IP): ~250 Hz/cm 2, corresponding to ~10% occupancy in the MDT chambers.  Present level 1 trigger rates would be as high as 140 kHz for single muon trigger with p T >20 GeV at the HL-LHC peak luminosity.  Frequent buffer overflows of the MDT front-end electronics expected, due to a high trigger rate at high occupancy. M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 8

9. ATLAS@theme#1  Present upgrade plans - the two major ones:  Small Wheels will be replaced in phase-1 upgrade by New Small Wheels (NSW), using sTGC and Micromegas chambers. NSW is designed to be able to continue to operate under HL-LHC operating conditions, i.e. until the end of the lifetime of ATLAS.  Redesign of the complete level 0/1 muon trigger, which entails replacing a large fraction of the electronics chain of precision and trigger chambers. M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 9

10. CMS@theme1 - Physics context  Muon offline coverage and trigger performance critical independent of physics; e.g. sensitivity to H couplings measurements strongly depends on channels with µ:  H-> ττ-> µ +X is key for measuring coupling to fermions  H->ZZ->4µ or 2µ+X is key for coupling to vector bosons  H->2 µ will be measurable at high luminosity giving new insight on fermion coupling  Substantial gains in LHC reach, if iCMS to extend muon system and possibly triggering capabilities beyond current η=2.4  A substantial challenge as even maintaining the current envelope may not be easy, given very high rates and limitations arising from complex magnetic field configuration, material.  Particularly strong motivation for going forward if inner tracking capabilities are extended simultaneously (being considered by CMS) M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 10

11. CMS@theme2 - Scenarios for moving forward A 2-prong strategy being pursued:  Work to ensure maintaining the current µ offline and triggering envelope, provide strengthening as required  Very likely that we will find that it will be necessary as a third of µ coverage 1.6<η<2.4 is in potential jeopardy due to rate increases and trigger bandwidth limitations  A thorough cost-benefit analysis of scenarios extending into the region of up to η=3.5-4.0  Physics gains substantial, but challenges can be very significant  The outcome will depend on other sub-system’s plans, especially tracking, but also the calorimeter  New technologies capable of withstanding high rates are considered (GEM, MPGD, iRPC) including new ideas, e.g. imaging calorimeter with µ tagging  Simulation will be critical to provide the full picture M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 11

12. CMS#theme1 - Challenges in more detail  Maintaining current envelope:  All the original complexities for the forward region stay in place: magnetic field, large material budget, high background rates, triggering challenges, shielding concerns given the space constraints  Rate increase further complicates these old challenges, but also bring new ones (aging)  Enhanced coverage options beyond η=2.4 and up to η=4.0:  New ideas in the context of physics enhancements due to better triggering, resolution and efficiency, including the broader context of the related detector systems (tracking, calorimetry)  Detector technology choices at very forward region driven by high rates and aging.  Post-Phase-2: 10s of kHz/cm 2 in the region η=1.6-2.4.  Expect a further rate increase, perhaps up to an order of magnitude on the high eta edge? Even higher abilities to withstand aging needed M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 12

13. ALICE@theme#1  The plans of the ALICE muon system (MS) upgrades are limited (as compared to CMS/ATLAS ones) because the constraints on the luminosity are much less important  ALICE MS upgrades are fully scheduled to be installed during the LS2, nothing foreseen for LS3.  Operating conditions and requirements. ALICE operating conditions after LS2:  PbPb 100 kHz (MAX collision rate) => L~10^28 /cm/s (the constraints in pp are expected to be less)  One order of magnitude above the MS present design.  Total integrated luminosity in PbPb ~10 nb-1 (goal) M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 13

14. ALICE@theme#2-3  Detector upgrades  Existing MS: Angular coverage: 2-9 degrees (one arm only)  Muon Traking, 10 planes of cathode pad/strip chambers, 1 Mch  Muon Trigger, 4 planes of single gap RPCs, 20 Kch  Upgrade Plans: No modification of the existing detectors  Electronics upgrades  Replacement of the readout electronics of the Muon Tracking and Muon Trigger, towards a dead time free readout => ALICE CRU (Common Readout Units)  Replacement of the very FE of the Muon Tracking => based on ongoing developements of the S-ALTRO chip essentially  Replacement of the very FE of the Muon Trigger => very FE with amplification (it is not the case presentely) for operation in genuine avalanche mode (like CMS/ATLAS RPCs) in order to limit the RPC aging => new ASIC (FEERIC) being developped M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 14

15. LHCb@themes 1-2-3  Upgrade taking place in LS2, like ALICE  Operating conditions and requirements  After LS2 we will be operating at 2 x 1o 33 cm -2 -s-1, which is x10 w.r.t. current design, but only x5 w.r.t. to current data taking conditions Plan is to acquire 50 fb-1 in 10 years.  Muon chambers for the upgrades  Only minor modifications of the existing muon detector (but probably only between LS2 and LS3): some highly irradiated detectors ( MHz/cm2) will be replaced with triple-GEM detectors with pad reaodut  Electronics upgrade - This is the main goal of our upgrade:  new common readout boards for 40 MHz readout  new muon off detector electronics boards  low level muon trigger at 40 MHz used just after LS2, and eventually we will go to NO low level trigger and processing of ALL events by high level trigger with a super PC farm  new electronics for muon control M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 15

16. Things to do  Decide if split theme#2 into two talks  Better define talks from #2 on (talk #1 is quite well defined)  Decide speakers and allocate talks M. Abbrescia Muon System Preparatory Group 16