Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparing Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Food Distribution in Eau Claire Wisconsin WILL ULLRICH GEOGRAPHY 401 APRIL 14 TH, 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparing Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Food Distribution in Eau Claire Wisconsin WILL ULLRICH GEOGRAPHY 401 APRIL 14 TH, 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparing Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Food Distribution in Eau Claire Wisconsin WILL ULLRICH GEOGRAPHY 401 APRIL 14 TH, 2015

2 Introduction  What is Geography?  How is it a Science?

3 Project Goal  Exploring relationship between distance traveled and Carbon Dioxide released.  Focusing only on food distributors

4 Geographic Traditions  Human-Environmental  Regional  Spatial

5 Geographic Concepts  Agriculture  Infrastructure  Carbon Dioxide Emissions

6 Methods  Locations:  Just Local Foods  Mega Co-Op  Wal-Mart  Festival Foods  Gordy’s County Market  Food Items:  Milk  Cheese  Bread  Eggs  Meat

7 C02 Analysis  According to a 2014 Vehicle Technologies report:  The range of miles per gallon (mpg) for most mass transport vehicles is 4 to 7.5.  The average is 6.5 mpg per thousand ton-mile  According to fueleconomy.gov burning One gallon, which weighs 6.3 pounds, produces 20 pounds of C02.  To find the C02 produced for each brand we will take:  (Distance/6.5)x20= number of pounds produced

8 Milk Analysis: Milk:Just LocalMegaWal-Mart Festival Foods Gordy’s County Market Distance from Eau Claire (Miles) Pounds of C02 Produced Crystal Ball Farms X 89.13274.25 Mega Co- Op X 00 Kemps XXX 82.67254.37 Great Value X 1630.045015.51 Land O’ Lakes X X998.23071.38 TruMoo XXX998.23071.38 Nestle X 1981.116095.72 Organic Valley XX 117.42361.29 Horizon Organic X 974.332997.94 Wild Harvest X 105.15323.54 Castle Rock X 24.3674.95 Morning Glory X 197.18606.71 Festival X 105.15323.54 Dean’s X 305.89941.2 Fa!rlife X 317.15975.85 Lactaid X 1307.564023.26 Dairy Fresh X305.89941.2

9

10

11 Milk Conclusion  It is obvious that the closer a distributor is to the city the less C02 will be produced. Looking at the graphs we see this:  Mega Co-Op brand milk was the lowest producer of C02 due to the fact that it is sold from its point of distribution.  Nestle was by far the highest producer as it is distributed from Glendale, California.

12 Future Research  Producer to distributor distance data  Product load per delivery  Compare to alternative forms of transportation

13 Sources  Malaczynski, Joanna D., and Timothy. P. Duane. 2009. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Vehicle Miles Traveled: Integrating the California Environmental Quality Act with California Global Warming Solutions Act. Ecology Law Quarterly. 36: 71.  Vogt, Rainbow A., and Lucia L. Kaiser. 2008. Still a time to act: A review of institutional marketing of regionally grown food. Agriculture & Human Values. 25: 241-255.


Download ppt "Comparing Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Food Distribution in Eau Claire Wisconsin WILL ULLRICH GEOGRAPHY 401 APRIL 14 TH, 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google