Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Assessment of Aquatic Biological Communities Along a Gradient of Urbanization in the Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Oregon and Washington Ian Waite, Kurt.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Assessment of Aquatic Biological Communities Along a Gradient of Urbanization in the Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Oregon and Washington Ian Waite, Kurt."— Presentation transcript:

1 Assessment of Aquatic Biological Communities Along a Gradient of Urbanization in the Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Oregon and Washington Ian Waite, Kurt Carpenter, Andrew Arnsberg, Frank Rinella, Steve Sobieszczyk, Ian Wigger, Curt Hughes and Mike Sarantou National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program

2 Seattle Sacramento Raleigh Atlanta Portland Denver Dallas-Ft. Worth Milwaukee- Green Bay Salt Lake City Boston Birmingham NAWQA Urban Gradient Studies

3 Oregon Willamette River Valley Willamette River Valley, Oregon

4 Willamette Urban Intensity Index Urban Index Population Density per sq mile

5 Willamette Urban and Ag Willamette Valley Ecoregion

6 Tickle Creek near Boring, Oregon Urban Index = 32

7 Urban Streams Claggett Creek Amazon Creek Pringle Creek Urban Index = 77 - 100

8 Water chemistry Habitat Algal Invertebrate Fish assemblages

9

10 Y-Axis Invertebrate Tolerance (Weighted Abundance) Y-Axis % Ephemeroptera Plecoptera Trichoptera Richness

11 nMDS Ordination of Invertebrate Density (Log X+1) w/ overlay of Population Density AXIS 1 AXIS 2

12 What variables are related to the Ordination Axis 1?

13 Plot of Population Density vs. % AG+Urban Land Use (% disturbance) Transition High Pop.Den Med/High AG+Urb Low/Med Pop.Den High AG+Urb Low AG+Urb

14 Multivariate Regression Tree (MRT: Primer) Linking Inverts to Environmental Data (coded by %AG+Urban) A: DO > 3.4 (< 2.5) TEQ 1120) A B C H D TEQ, DO and Sum_PEST B: Sum_PEST 0.087) % AG+Ur Categories < 15 % 15 – 39 40 – 69 > 69 %

15 Nonparametric Regression Tree Linking Inverts to Environmental Data (coded by %AG+Urban) nC: TEQ n D & E: DO n F & G: Sum_PEST B G F E C I H J K L D A  H: TEQ  I: DO  J: Sum_PEST  K: TEQ  L: Sum_PEST

16 % Fish Metric Includes 4 Metrics n % Salmonids % Native (other species) n % Reticulate Sculpin n % Introduced or Exotic poor condition poor condition % Fish Metric Includes 4 Metrics n % Salmonids % Native (other species) n % Reticulate Sculpin n % Introduced or Exotic

17 “What do you mean cooties, no cooties on me.” FZ Exotic Species

18 nMDS Ordination of Fish Abundance (Log X+1) with overlay of Population Density 600 2400 4200 6000 per sq mile

19 Preliminary CONCLUSIONS  Fish showed a linear response as urban intensity increases based on individual metrics % EPT Richness  Invertebrates showed a smooth threshold for some metrics at Urban Index values of ~25 or < 5-10% Impervious

20 Preliminary CONCLUSIONS  Flashiness of urban stream flows usually related to % impervious does not seem to be the dominate factor affecting the biological assemblages in the Willamette Valley  Biotic assemblages were strongly related to differences in WQ among sites (e.g., TEQ, Pesticides, DO, and Water Temp.) likely due to Urban and AG land use disturbances – either singularly or in combination.

21 High Pop.Den & High AG+Urb High AG+Urb & Low/Med Pop.Den Low Pop.Den & Low AG+Urb  Little difference found in fish and inverts between High AG+Urban (% disturbance) and High Population Density sites Preliminary CONCLUSIONS

22  Prediction of invertebrate metrics at unsampled sites using the urban index will be attempted using EPA and/or ODEQ sites in Willamette Valley – still amassing the data % EPT Richness

23 Evaluating the Effects of Urbanization on Water Quality I – II Concurrent Session F & G: Tues. 1 – 5 pm Panel Discussion Effects of Urbanization on Streams Tuesday 7:00-9:00 pm Meeting Room A8, SJ Convention Center Contact Info: Ian Waite iwaite@usgs.gov, 503-251-3463iwaite@usgs.gov

24 nMDS Ordination of Invertebrate Density Sites coded by %AG+Urban %AG+Ur Categories < 15 % 15 – 39 40 – 69 > 69 % AXIS 1 AXIS 2

25 Hypothetical response to increasing urban intensity…..threshold or linear or none? Minimum threshold Maximum threshold Resistance

26 Population Density % Impervious 0.98 % Urban 0.98 Road Den. 0.95 Urban Index 0.98 Mean Watershed Elev. -0.88 Watershed Slope -0.81 3 Flow Stats 0.73 DOC 0.70, SO4 0.71 TN 0.81, TP 0.73 Pest. Tox. Index_Summer 0.70 Sum_Insecticide 0.70 TEQ 0.79 Environmental Variables usually surrogates for many processes


Download ppt "Assessment of Aquatic Biological Communities Along a Gradient of Urbanization in the Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Oregon and Washington Ian Waite, Kurt."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google