1. PROGRAM REVIEW An Overview 2016-2017

2. Resources  Program Review Officers James Marshall – Graduate Programs Aide Navarro ainavarro@csufresno.edu 278-2448ainavarro@csufresno.edu Xuanning Fu – Undergraduate Programs Aide Navarro ainavarro@csufresno.edu 278-2448ainavarro@csufresno.edu  Office of Institutional Effectiveness (OIE) Angel Sanchez  Program Review Website http://www.fresnostate.edu/academics/policies-forms/prog-review/

4. Process Timeline TASK DESCRIPTION YEAR1YEAR2 SONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAM Program notified of upcoming review Identify self-study coordinator X Orientation meeting with chairs/coordinators X OIE provides program with data set X Prepare self-study XXXXX Draft of self-study to College/School Dean XX Submit self-study to university level X University level responds to draft self-study XX Final self-study to university level X Identify review team members XXXX Schedule review team visit XX Review team visit X Report from review team to program X Program response to review team report XX School/College Dean's response to review team report X University committee review team response XXXXX Univ. Comm. letter to Dept./Univ. X Schedule Action Plan meeting XX Action Plan by department XX Action Plan response from the dean XX Action Plan meeting XX *University Level refers to Program Review Officer(s)

5. Accreditation MAJOR TASKS Program is notified of upcoming review Program notifies DGS of national accreditation date Accreditation review team site-visit Findings from the national accreditation review team’s visit are submitted to DGS Program’s response to accreditation findings is submitted to DGS School/College Dean’s response to accreditation findings is submitted to DGS University committee reviews responses and accreditation documentation and a copy of the report is submitted to DGS Action Plan meeting is scheduled Action Plan is submitted to review officer(s) Action Plan meeting is held Final Action Plan is signed and distributed  Abbreviated Program Review for Nationally Accredited Programs Still required that expectations of APM 220 be met In addition, the program will also provide: Student Outcomes assessment Plan (SOAP) Findings of the site-visit Final accreditation decision

6. Elements of Self-Study Self-Study Coordinator Previous Review Team Report and Action Plan OIE Dataset Current Vision and Mission Statement Information about your program Faculty vitae Self-Study TemplateTemplate Note that a separate self-study must be prepared for each degree program.

7. Visiting Team  Consists of three people A discipline expert from another campus A faculty member from your college/school A faculty member from outside your college/school  Qualifications  Nominated by the program and approved by the college/school Dean Outside expert – please nominate three people using the Review Panel Nomination Form Review Panel Nomination Form Campus team members – emailed to James Marshall and/or Xuanning Fu

9. Thank you