1. Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 CHAPTER 10: THE PHILLIPS CURVE, THE NATURAL RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT AND INFLATION

2. Slide 10.2 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Fonte: A.W. Philliips“The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom”, Economica, vol. 25, No. 100 (Nov. 1958), 283-299 Phillips (1958) In the original formulation. Empirical relation between unemployment rate and the rate of change of nominal wages. UK (1861-1913) Phillips’ Curve - UK

3. Slide 10.3 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 The Natural Rate of Unemployment and the Phillips Curve The Phillips curve, based on the data above, shows a negative relation between inflation and unemployment. Figure 10.1 Inflation versus unemployment in the USA, 1900–1960 During the period 1900–1960 in the USA, a low unemployment rate was typically associated with a high inflation rate, and a high unemployment rate was typically associated with a low or negative inflation rate.

4. Slide 10.4 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 10.1 Inflation, Expected Inflation and Unemployment How is it possible to derive this relation. Departing from the AS: Applying logs: It is possible to add and subtract the lagged value of P (P t-1 ): The differences in prices is the inflation rate. Further, we can write log(1+ μ ) ≅ μ. Then we can end up with the following relation: 4

5. Slide 10.5 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 According to this equation: An increase in the expected inflation,  e, leads to an increase in inflation, . Given expected inflation,  e, an increase in the mark-up,  or an increase in the factors that affect wage determination —an increase in z — leads to an increase in inflation, . Given expected inflation,  e, an increase in the unemployment rate, u, leads to a decrease in inflation, . 10.1 Inflation, Expected Inflation and Unemployment (Continued)

6. Slide 10.6 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 When referring to inflation, expected inflation or unemployment in a specific year, the equation above needs to include time indexes as follows: 10.1 Inflation, Expected Inflation and Unemployment (Continued) The variables ,  t e and u t refer to inflation, expected inflation and unemployment in year t.  and z are assumed constant and do not have time indexes.

7. Slide 10.7 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 If we set  t e = 0, then: This is the negative relation between unemployment and inflation that Phillips found for the United Kingdom, and Solow and Samuelson found for the United States (or the original Phillips curve). Unemployment and prices are related by nominal wages. 10.2 The Phillips Curve The early incarnation

8. Slide 10.8 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 The wage – price spiral: Given Low unemployment leads to a higher nominal wage. In response to the higher nominal wage, firms increase their prices and the price level increases. In response, workers ask for a higher wage. Higher nominal wage leads firms to further increase prices. As a result, the price level increases further. This further increases wages asked for by workers. And so the race between prices and wages results in steady wage and price inflation. The early incarnation 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

9. Slide 10.9 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Mutations Figure 10.2 Inflation versus unemployment in the USA, 1948–1969 The steady decline in the US unemployment rate throughout the1960s was associated with a steady increase in the inflation rate. 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

10. Slide 10.10 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Mutations Figure 10.3 Inflation versus unemployment in the USA since 1970 Beginning in 1970, the relation between the unemployment rate and the inflation rate disappeared in the USA. No longer a clear relation between u and π. 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

11. Slide 10.11 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 The negative relation between unemployment and inflation held throughout the 1960s, but it vanished after that for two reasons: An increase in the price of oil, but more importantly, Change in the way wage setters formed expectations due to a change in the behaviour of the rate of inflation. −The inflation rate became consistently positive and −Inflation became more persistent. Mutations 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

12. Slide 10.12 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Mutations Figure 10.4 US inflation since 1900 Since the 1960s, the US inflation rate has been consistently positive. Inflation has also become more persistent: a high inflation rate this year is more likely to be followed by a high inflation rate next year. 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

13. Slide 10.13 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Suppose expectations of inflation are formed according to The parameter  captures the effect of last year’s inflation rate,  t  1, on this year’s expected inflation rate, The value of  steadily increased in the 1970s, from zero to one. Mutations 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

14. Slide 10.14 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 We can think of what happened in the 1970s as an increase in the value of  over time: As long as inflation was low and not very persistent, it was reasonable for workers and firms to ignore past inflation and to assume that the price level this year would be roughly the same as the price level last year. But, as inflation became more persistent, workers and firms started changing the ways they formed expectations. Mutations 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

15. Slide 10.15 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 When  equals zero, we get the original Phillips curve, a relation between the inflation rate and the unemployment rate: When  is positive, the inflation rate depends on both the unemployment rate and last year’s inflation rate: Mutations 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

16. Slide 10.16 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 When  = 1, the unemployment rate affects not the inflation rate, but the change in the inflation rate. Since 1970, a clear negative relation emerged between the unemployment rate and the change in the inflation rate. When θ equals 1, the relation becomes (moving last year’s inflation rate to the left side of the equation) Mutations 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

17. Slide 10.17 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 The line that best fits the scatter of points for the period 1970–2006 is: Mutations Figure 10.5 Change in inflation versus unemployment in the USA since 1970 Since 1970, there has been a negative relation between the unemployment rate and the change in the inflation rate in the USA. 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

18. Slide 10.18 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 The original Phillips curve is: The modified Phillips curve, or the expectations- augmented Phillips curve or the accelerationist Phillips curve is: Mutations 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

19. Slide 10.19 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Friedman and Phelps questioned the trade-off between unemployment and inflation. They argued that the unemployment rate could not be sustained below a certain level, a level they called the ‘natural rate of unemployment’. The natural rate of unemployment is the unemployment rate such that the actual inflation rate is equal to the expected inflation rate. then, Back to the natural rate of unemployment 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

20. Slide 10.20 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 This is an important relation because it gives another way of thinking about the Phillips curve in terms of the actual and the natural unemployment rates and the change in the inflation rate. Finally, assuming that  t e is well approximated by  t  1, then: Let’s start from the basic relation: From the definition of the natural unemploymetn rate: (μ+z)=αu n Back to the natural rate of unemployment 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

21. Slide 10.21 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 The equation above is an important relation for two reasons: It gives us another way of thinking about the Phillips curve: as a relation between the actual unemployment rate u t, the natural unemployment rate u n and the change in the inflation rate It also gives us another way of thinking about the natural rate of unemployment. The non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment, (or NAIRU), is the rate of unemployment required to keep the inflation rate constant. Back to the natural rate of unemployment 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

22. Slide 10.22 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Let’s summarise what we have learned so far: The aggregate supply relation is well captured in the United States today by a relation between the change in the inflation rate and the deviation of the unemployment rate from the natural rate of unemployment. When the unemployment rate exceeds the natural rate of unemployment, the inflation rate decreases. When the unemployment rate is below the natural rate of unemployment, the inflation rate increases. A summary and many warnings 10.2 The Phillips Curve (Continued)

23. Slide 10.23 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Theory Ahead of Facts: Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps Economists are usually not very good at predicting major changes before they happen. Here is an exception. In the late 1960s—precisely as the original Phillips curve relation was working like a charm—two economists, Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps, argued that the appearance of a trade-off between inflation and unemployment was an illusion. Friedman could not have been more right. A few years later, the original Phillips curve started to disappear, in exactly the way Friedman had predicted.

24. Slide 10.24 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 The factors that affect the natural rate of unemployment above differ across countries. Therefore, there is no reason to expect all countries to have the same natural rate of unemployment.  Variations in the natural rate across countries 10.3 The Phillips Curve and the Natural Rate of Unemployment in Europe

25. Slide 10.25 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 In the equation above, the terms  and z may not be constant but, in fact, vary over time, leading to changes in the natural rate of unemployment. In Europe, the natural unemployment rate has increased a lot since the 1960s. In the United States, the natural unemployment rate increased by 1–2% from the 1960s to the 1980s, and appears to have decreased since then. 10.3 The Phillips Curve and the Natural Rate of Unemployment in Europe (Continued)

26. Slide 10.26 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Figure 10.6 Relationship between trends in product market regulation and wages in Europe (1998, 2003, 2008). This entails changes in μ. Source: OECD, Eurostat. 10.3 The Phillips Curve and the Natural Rate of Unemployment in Europe (Continued)

27. Slide 10.27 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 What explains European unemployment? Labour market rigidities: A generous system of unemployment insurance A high degree of employment protection Minimum wages Bargaining rules This factors affect z. Structural reforms to reduce regulations and protection reduce z, and hence reduce the natural rate of unemployment. 10.3 The Phillips Curve and the Natural Rate of Unemployment in Europe (Continued)

28. Slide 10.28 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 The relation between unemployment and inflation is likely to change with the level and the persistence of inflation. When inflation is high, it is also more variable. The form of wage agreements also changes with the level of inflation. Wage indexation, a rule that automatically increases wages in line with inflation, becomes more prevalent when inflation is high. High inflation and the Phillips curve relation 10.3 The Phillips Curve and the Natural Rate of Unemployment in Europe (Continued)

29. Slide 10.29 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Slide #29 Rational Expectations and Philips’ curve Rational Expectations In the seventies, some US economists, among which R. Lucas e T. Sargent (University of Chicago), claimed that the assumption of adaptive expectation (π=πt-1) was not able to capture the choices of individuals. Why looking only at the past level of prices? Individual are rational, and try to predict the future in the best way they can. This mean they will use all the available information to do it.

30. Slide 10.30 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Slide #30  For instance, if there is a credible announcement of monetary policy (for instance restrictive monetary policy to reduce inflation), individuals will take this announcement into account, i.e. they will use all the available information and not just use the previous level of inflation to predict the future one.  Since all the available information is exploited, the forecast error can be considered as casual. Rational Expectations and Phillips’ curve

31. Slide 10.31 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Slide #31 Rational Expectations and Phillips’ curve Formally rational expectations can be written as follows: ε is a random variable with zero mean, and ε does not depend on inflation. Hence, the Phillips curve becomes: With rational expectation there is no longer a negative relation beetwen unemployment and inflation, the Phillips curve becomes vertical, unemployment does not depend on inflation.

32. Slide 10.32 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 π t -π t-1 0 utut unun Rational Expectations and Phillips’ curve

33. Slide 10.33 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Slide #33 For this reason, on average u t =u n, since the difference between u t and u n has zero mean. It is equal to ε t /α, which has zero mean. Deviations of u t from u n are casual, and do not depend on inflation. Under the assumption of rational expectation, the trade off between inflation and unemployment does not longer exist. The difference between adaptive and rational expectation can be important when evaluating the impact of a monetary policy aimed at reducing inflation. Rational Expectations and Phillips’ curve

34. Slide 10.34 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Slide #34 Rational Expectations and Phillips’ curve With adaptive expectation the reduction in inflation leads to an increase in unemployment. With rational expectation, and with a credible government, the policy announcement would be completely incorporated in the expectation of economic agents, i.e. the target of lower inflation might be achieved without an increase in unemployment. The empirical evidence suggests the a reduction in inflation is associated to some increase in unemployment. This means that the true is probably in the middle of the way: the Phillips curve is not vertical but it is steeper than it would be using adaptive expectations.

35. Slide 10.35 Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, Macroeconomics: A European Perspective PowerPoints on the Web, 2 nd edition © Pearson Education Limited 2014 Key Terms Phillips curve Wage – price spiral Modified or expectations-augmented or accelerationist Phillips curve Non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU) Labour market rigidities Unemployment insurance Employment protection Extension agreements Disinflation and credibility Wage indexation