1. F-Troop METL Assessment 15 April 2015 1

2. Overall Assessment Academic (P) – Not strong academically, but resources to improve DRASTICALLY if used appropriately Military (P) – Average overall. Room to improve. Focus on drill and utilizing COC to create more effective inspections; maintain professional standards for training of 4 th class cadets Physical Effectiveness (P) – Overall, good. Utilize physically fit leaders to raise standards of average/below average cadets Moral/Ethical(T) – Excellent; stay vigilant for alcohol issues and potential honor violations; stamp out any perceived gender discrimination/corps squad hatred 2

3. Academic Assessment Strengths – Senior Class/Academic Officer = Strong – Excellent Guard Schedule format – ESP environment = good Weaknesses – Rising Sophomore Class GPA is low (2.7) – Not everyone studies in their room during ESP – Tutoring/other resources not maximized 3

4. Academic Assessment Fall 2012 GPA Summaries SEMESTER GPA's BY COMPANYSEMESTER GPA's 4C BY COMPANY StandingCompanyGPAStandingCompanyGPA 1RBd3.0921L3.12 2N3.0792H3.093 3F3.055 3RBd3.062 4B3.054F3.044 Fall 2013 GPA Summaries SEMESTER GPA's BY COMPANY StandingCompanyGPA 1PB3.112 2C3.109 3B3.067 4D3.065 5 K3.052 6L3.027 7I3.020 8F3.006 Fall 2014 GPA Summaries CADET COMPANYSEMESTER GPA Alpha Company3.006 Band Company3.072 Bravo Company3.182 Charlie Company3.017 Delta Company3.091 Echo Company2.972 Victor Company2.960 India Company3.075 Kilo Company2.987 Lima Company3.039 Mike Company3.038 Palmetto Battery3.246 Papa Company3.005 14 F2.959

5. Company Awards SY 2013 (Arrows = change for 2014) PRESIDENT'S CUPSUMMERALL CUP (GPA)COMMANDANT'S CUP (Parades) StandingCompanyStandingCompanySY GPAStandingCompany 1RBd1 3.1041PB 2C2N3.0492RBd 3PB3C3.03753V 4S 4F3.027 4S 5V5B3.02555P 6O6M2.99156R 7PB7O2.98957H 8N8T2.97858E 9F 9PB2.972 9F 10H I2.959510G 11M S2.93711N 12B H2.909512M G13P2.908513O D14G2.914I A15A2.86415B I16D2.86316L R17V2.85917K T18L2.851518D L19K2.79619C E20R2.791520T K21E2.718521A [more is better] BOV TROPHY (Sports)REG COMMANDER'S BOWL (4 th Class)BLOOD DRIVES StandingCompanyStandingCompanyStandingCompany 1D1A1PB 2O2S2C 3C3H3V 4T4E4S 5G5RBd5A 6H6C6P 7S7P7O 8 8L8B 9V9G8I 10M R9T 11PB11PB 10F 12L D11D 13A I12M 14N V13K 15F F 14RBd 16K O14R 17B K15N 18E T16L 19P N17G 20R B18E 21I M19H 4 7 3 14 3

6. Academic Pillar Strategy Enforce ESP environment Academic Officer = more ACTIVE role Tutoring/Incentives- (consider Band’s idea) 6

7. Military Assessment Strengths – Extremely professional 4 th Class Training Needs attention to 4 Class System – MRIs – SMIs Weaknesses – 4 th Class Violations (only 2, but 2 too many) – Alcohol abuse – Parade performance (9 th Overall) – Personal Appearance issues – Weekend Duty 7

8. Military Assessment 8

9. Military Pillar Strategy Continue professional training environment Continue frequent MRIs (year-round) Improve Company Drill – Individual Company Drill – Increase individual/company motivation Better use of PLs, PSGs, Squad Leaders Better Weekend Duty training 9

10. Physical Effectiveness Assessment Strengths – 8 th in CPFT Score – 5 th in Pass Rate (1 st in 2 nd Battalion) – Only 2 returning deficient cadets (0 Ht./Wt.) – Lots of military contracts – Currently 3 rd in BOV standings – Strong overall pride Weaknesses – 2 Failures (2 too many) – No system for deficient cadets – Morning PT is not taken seriously by many Mondays are hard when missing contracted cadets 10

11. Physical Effectiveness Assessment 11 CPFT avg. this year Number of CPFT failures last year Number of CPFT failures this year Number of H & W failures last year Number of H & W failures this year 1C2500202 2C2254010 3C2552110 4C2700100 Total~2506422

12. Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy Get to 100% CPFT pass rate (95.7% this semester) – Utilize physically fit leadership to invest time in deficient cadets OUTSIDE of remedial PT Better use of Regimental PT time – More planning by PSGs/PLs leading PT – More discipline within ranks, especially from UC cadets 12

13. Moral-Ethical Assessment Strengths – Strong overall climate Concerning HVs, Hazing, 4 th Class Majors – Strong community service efforts – Great overall cohesion within the company Weaknesses – Alcohol issues – Few “rotten apples” honor-wise – Isolated instances of gender prejudice – Isolated instances of Corps Squad prejudice 13

14. Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy Continue strong value of the Honor System and the Spirit of the Code Increase awareness of alcohol issues Increase involvement/organization of community service Continue to promote unity between EVERYONE in the company 14

15. Overall Company Assessment Overall, great company Great group of people – We discriminate  against bad cadets ONLY Great culture/mindset Extremely professional group of people 15