1. Description Enhanced Assessment for Students with Visual and Print Disabilities NSCA June 2012

2. Partner States Utah Wendy Carver Jennifer Howell Amy Groll Colorado Tanni Anthony Kansas Deborah Matthews Partner Centers NCSSD Kay Ferrell Silvia Correa- Torres Kathryn Bostford Nana Phangia Dewald Catherine Smyth Aaron Dewald NCAM Bryan Gould External Partners John McLaughlin Carol Allman Diane Bassett Chuck Hitchcock Martha Thurlow Kevin King Hollie Murdock Trisha O'Connell

3. Disseminate Guidelines Web TrainingsOn Site Trainings Description Guidelines Published Results Conduct Assessment Administration Procedures Recruitment Spring & Fall Administration Analysis Develop Assessment Test Item SelectionVisual Bias ReviewTest Item Production Train Partners Project MeetingsAdvisory Meetings Visual Bias Committee Training

4. Assumptions Print Disabilities Limited or no experience with described media Disability impacts reading Reading accommodations Varied access to electronic text Not qualified for AA-AAS Visual Disabilities Some access to described media Description for instruction but not assessment Varied proficiency with tactile graphics Not qualified for AA-AAS

5. n=297 Presentation Conditions for Each Content Area (Math, ELA, Science) Reading Mode Description Tactile Graphics Students with Visual Disabilities (28/60) Braille Yes No Yes No Students with Visual Disabilities (82/105) and Print Disabilities (187/306) Print (large print, regular print, regular print w/ magnification) No Yes

6. Language Arts Tactile Described Both Print Described Math Tactile Described Both Print Described Science Tactile Described Both Print Described

7. Quantitative Results

8. Test Duration Test duration increased as grade level increased, from mean 15:53 (grade 3) to mean 21:04 (grade 8) Braille readers required a mean 39:50 minutes to complete 9 questions Large print readers required a mean 16:23 minutes to complete 6 questions Regular print readers required a mean 14:24 minutes to complete 6 questions

9. Grade, by Reading Medium GradeBraille Large Print Regular Print Total 3784257 44174768 53153452 66133049 75121936 83171535 Total:2882187297

10. Correct Responses, by Content Area (All Students) English Language Arts ScienceMath Percent correct 53.9%44.5%44.9%

11. Quantitative Conclusions Braille readers were more likely to select the correct answers when given image description without tactile graphics. All other students in the study were equally likely to select the correct answer whether given image description or not. Image description is an unbiased accommodation.

12. Qualitative Component (302 student & 117 teacher interviews)

13. Learn More! Search “describing images for assessment” – Project details – Updated results – 60 minute webinar for teachers – Example descriptions with assessment images – Guidelines for using description in assessment – Guidelines for describing STEM images

14. Funding for this project is from the U.S. Department of Education to the Utah State Office of Education under Grant Award #S368A090019. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations are those of the project team and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education.