1. www.fgdc.gov1 A Historical Perspective NGAC created 88 years after the 1 st AC J. Milo Robinson Framework & Partnership Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee For NGAC March 24, 2010

2. www.fgdc.gov2 Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) A US Federal interagency committee responsible for facilitating geospatial related activities and implementation of the NSDI across the Federal government Cooperate and coordinate with organizations from state, local and tribal governments, the academic community, and the private sector Created by revision to OMB Circular A-16

3. www.fgdc.gov3 National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) The vision of the NSDI: to assure that spatial data from multiple sources (Federal, State, and local governments, academia, and the private sector) are widely available and easily integrated to enhance knowledge and understanding of our physical and cultural world.

4. www.fgdc.gov4 SourceYear Description EO T.R. 1906 Created U. S. Geographic Board. EO 3206 Wilson 1919 Created a new Board of Surveys and Maps that took over the responsibilities of U.S. Geographic Board. EO 9094 FDR 1942 Abolished Board of Surveys and Maps and authorizes Director of OMB to perform the functions of the Board. OMB (BOB) A-16 1953 Describes responsibilities of Federal agencies with regard to the coordination of surveying and mapping activities. Historical Roots of FGDC

5. www.fgdc.gov5 Executive orders Avoid duplication of work and improve the standardization of maps (1906) A central information office that was to furnish all map and survey data information within the government as well as from other sources (1919) Invite the ”map using public” to meetings for ”conference and advice” (1919)

6. www.fgdc.gov6 How did the Board of Survey and Maps get Advice? Created an Advisory Committee Major focus was the need for –Topographic Map of the U.S. Held first public conference March 1920 “..great possibilities, if we can do our work in harmony within the organizations and in full cooperation with agencies from the outside.”

7. www.fgdc.gov7 by Board Chair to the Advisory Committee “we hope that you will be able to organize in the outside agencies, states, municipalities, technical societies and universities a method by which their work may be correlated. It is not enough that government alone should correlate its activities and establish its own standards, but it is necessary that other organizations public and private engaged in mapping and surveying work come into sufficiently close contact with the government that we may be operating under common standards”

8. www.fgdc.gov8 Who was on the Advisory Committee? American Automobile Association American Forestry Association American Institute of Electrical Engineers Amer. Inst. Of Mining & Metallurgical Eng. Amer. Railway Eng. Association Association of State Geologists Engineering Council Geologic Society of America Map Publishers National Research Council Society of Automotive Eng. Later on: American Society of Photogrammetry Later on: Rand McNally

9. www.fgdc.gov9 How was Advisory Committee (AC) Organized? Chairman Secretary Executive Committee 22 members AC will disseminate information so that everyone interested can write to the AC Board would always be glad to receive suggestions from AC

10. www.fgdc.gov10 Advisory Committee aligned with Board’s Standing Committees Coordination Cooperation Technical Standards Topographic Maps Highway Maps General Maps Control Photographic Surveying Information

11. www.fgdc.gov11 Minutes of Meeting March 1921 …there were not 12 Federal agencies which were making topographic maps … careful investigation had shown that only 5 or 6 Federal agencies were actually engaged…

12. www.fgdc.gov12 From the minutes (1921) The Advisory Council could help in expediting the mapping of the United States, particularly by urging congress to recognize it as a major engineering activity Congress would pay more attention to non-official presentations then to bureau chiefs

13. www.fgdc.gov13 Undated Report circa 1941 “One reason for the creation of the Advisory Council was to serve as a watch dog over the Board and to prevent it going to extremes. The Board is please that ‘disciplinary action’ has not been necessary. Instead it seeks a more active and a larger participation by the Advisory Committee in Board and Committee meetings”

14. www.fgdc.gov14 Advisory Committee Continued participation at Board meetings through 1942 Generally 2-4 members attend public meeting Little separate information about the AC Six EO (1920-1936) amending EO 3206 1942 Board & AC abolished and Bureau of Budget (OMB) took over responsibilities (EO 9094)

15. www.fgdc.gov15 National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC) Created in 2008 (88 years after 1 st AC) 28 Diverse Members of the Geo Comm. Advice and Recommendation to FGDC Meets 3-4 times/year Meetings open to the public & public comments welcome Federal Advisory Committee Act

16. www.fgdc.gov16 OMB Rules Bureau of the Budget, began its program of geospatial coordination in 1940 when it hired Robert Randal, an engineer, to perform this task. He became responsible for all the mapping production programs of the Federal Government. He held this position until he retired in 1960. He was the first President of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping and played a vital role in improving geospatial coordination. OMB Circular A-16, first issued in 1953 and since revised, mostly recent in 2002, remains the leading policy document for geospatial coordination in United States.

17. www.fgdc.gov17 Conclusions Coordination policies have well-established roots Policy goals are the same as in the past –standards –authoritative information source –broad participation in the coordination process. Coordination of geographic data is important. Ways to improve the organizational effectiveness of often stove- piped organizational structures within the Federal Government are needed. Need to stimulate cross agency coordination and collaboration History has shown that improving coordination and fostering organizational change that will benefit the development of the NSDI is difficult. If it was easy it would have been done 100 years ago.

18. www.fgdc.gov18 Thank You Questions? mrobinson@usgs.gov 703.648.5162