Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NEW FRONTIERS FOR ARCH MODELS Prepared for Conference on Volatility Modeling and Forecasting Perth, Australia, September 2001 Robert Engle UCSD and NYU.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NEW FRONTIERS FOR ARCH MODELS Prepared for Conference on Volatility Modeling and Forecasting Perth, Australia, September 2001 Robert Engle UCSD and NYU."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 NEW FRONTIERS FOR ARCH MODELS Prepared for Conference on Volatility Modeling and Forecasting Perth, Australia, September 2001 Robert Engle UCSD and NYU

3 The First ARCH Model  Rolling Volatility or “Historical” Volatility Estimator – Weights are equal for j<N – Weights are zero for j>N – What is N?

4 1982 ARCH Paper  Weights can be estimated  ARCH(p)

5 WHAT ABOUT HETEROSKEDASTICITY?

6 EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHER  Another Simple Model – Weights are declining – No finite cutoff – What is lambda? (Riskmetrics=.06)

7 The GARCH Model   The variance of r t is a weighted average of three components – a constant or unconditional variance – yesterday’s forecast – yesterday’s news

8

9

10 FORECASTING WITH GARCH  GARCH(1,1) can be written as ARMA(1,1)  The autoregressive coefficient is  The moving average coefficient is

11 GARCH(1,1) Forecasts

12 Monotonic Term Structure of Volatility

13 FORECASTING AVERAGE VOLATILITY  Annualized Vol=square root of 252 times the average daily standard deviation  Assume that returns are uncorrelated.

14 TWO YEARS TERM STRUCTURE OF PORT

15

16 Variance Targeting  Rewriting the GARCH model  where is easily seen to be the unconditional or long run variance  this parameter can be constrained to be equal to some number such as the sample variance. MLE only estimates the dynamics

17 The Component Model  Engle and Lee(1999)  q is long run component and (h-q) is transitory  volatility mean reverts to a slowly moving long run component

18 MORE GARCH MODELS  CONSIDER ONLY SYMMETRIC GARCH MODELS  ESTIMATE ALL MODELS WITH A DECADE OF SP500 ENDING AUG 2 2001  GARCH(1,1), EGARCH(1,1), COMPONENT GARCH(1,1) ARE FAMILIAR

19

20 OLDER GARCH MODELS  Bollerslev-Engle(1986) Power GARCH omega0.0005870.0023400.251006 alpha0.0670710.0090867.381861 p 1.7128180.11721214.61294 beta0.9411320.005546169.7078 Log likelihood-3739.091

21 PARCH  Ding Granger Engle(1993) omega0.0066800.0016534.041563 alpha 0.0649300.00560811.57887 gamma0.6656360.0828148.037719 beta 0.9416250.005211180.704 Log likelihood-3738.040

22 TAYLOR-SCHWERT  Standard deviation model omega0.0076780.0016674.605529 alpha0.0652320.00521212.51587 beta 0.9425170.005104184.6524 Log likelihood-3739.032

23

24 SQ-GARCH MODEL  SQGARCH (Engle and Ishida(2001)) has the property that the variance of the variance is linear in the variance. They establish conditions for positive and stationary variances

25 SQGARCH LogL: SQGARCH Method: Maximum Likelihood (Marquardt) Date: 08/03/01 Time: 19:47 Sample: 2 2928 Included observations: 2927 Evaluation order: By observation Convergence achieved after 12 iterations Coefficient Std. Errorz-StatisticProb. C(1)0.0088740.0015965.5602360.0000 C(2)0.0418780.00368511.363830.0000 C(3)0.9900800.001990497.58500.0000 Log likelihood-3747.891 Akaike info criterion2.562960 Avg. log likelihood-1.280455 Schwarz criterion2.569090 Number of Coefs.3 Hannan-Quinn criter.2.565168

26 CEV-GARCH MODEL  The elasticity of conditional variance with respect to conditional variance is a parameter to be estimated.  Slight adjustment is needed to ensure positive variance forecasts.

27 NON LINEAR GARCH  THE MODEL IS IGARCH WITHOUT INTERCEPT. HOWEVER, FOR SMALL VARIANCES, IT IS NONLINEAR AND CANNOT IMPLODE  FOR

28 NLGARCH LogL: NLGARCH Method: Maximum Likelihood (Marquardt) Date: 08/18/01 Time: 11:27 Initial Values: C(2)=0.05464, C(4)=0.00035, C(1)=2.34004 Convergence achieved after 32 iterations CoefficientStd. Errorz-StatisticProb. alpha0.0541960.00474911.411580.0000 gamma0.0012080.0019350.6242990.5324 delta3.1940724.4712260.7143620.4750 Log likelihood-3741.520 Akaike info criterion2.558606 Avg. log likelihood-1.278278 Schwarz criterion2.564737 Number of Coefs.3 Hannan-Quinn criter.2.560814

29

30 Asymmetric Models - The Leverage Effect  Engle and Ng(1993) following Nelson(1989)  News Impact Curve relates today’s returns to tomorrows volatility  Define d as a dummy variable which is 1 for down days

31 NEWS IMPACT CURVE

32 Other Asymmetric Models

33 PARTIALLY NON-PARAMETRIC ENGLE AND NG(1993)

34 EXOGENOUS VARIABLES IN A GARCH MODEL  Include predetermined variables into the variance equation  Easy to estimate and forecast one step  Multi-step forecasting is difficult  Timing may not be right

35 EXAMPLES  Non-linear effects  Deterministic Effects  News from other markets – Heat waves vs. Meteor Showers – Other assets – Implied Volatilities – Index volatility  MacroVariables or Events

36 STOCHASTIC VOLATILITY MODELS  Easy to simulate models  Easy to calculate realized volatility  Difficult to summarize past information set  How to define innovation

37 SV MODELS  Taylor(1982)  beta=.997  kappa=.055  Mu=0

38 Long Memory SV  Breidt et al, Hurvich and Deo  d=.47  kappa=.6

39 Breaking Volatility  Randomly arriving breaks in volatility  mu=-0.5  kappa=1  p=.99


Download ppt "NEW FRONTIERS FOR ARCH MODELS Prepared for Conference on Volatility Modeling and Forecasting Perth, Australia, September 2001 Robert Engle UCSD and NYU."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google