1. 32 Digital Academia The Future of Research @markhahnel @figshare

2. 2 “The Obama Administration is committed to the proposition that citizens deserve easy access to the results of scientific research their tax dollars have paid for. That’s why, in a policy memorandum released today, OSTP Director John Holdren has directed Federal agencies with more than $100M in R&D expenditures to develop plans to make the published results of federally funded research freely available to the public within one year of publication and requiring researchers to better account for and manage the digital data resulting from federally funded scientific research.” February 22nd 2013

3. “Investigators are expected to share with other researchers, at no more than incremental cost and within a reasonable time, the primary data, samples, physical collections and other supporting materials created or gathered in the course of work under NSF grants” http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocshttp://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/aag_6.jsp#VID4 “NIH expects the timely release and sharing of data to be no later than the acceptance for publication of the main findings from the final dataset” http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharingdata_sharing_guidance.htm#time “NEH is committed to timely and rapid data distribution ” http://www.neh.gov/files/grants/data_management_plans_2012.pdf

5. “But taxpayers who are paying for that research will want to see something back. Directly – through open access to results and data. And indirectly – through making science work better for all of us. That’s why we will require open access to all publications stemming from EU-funded research. That’s why we will progressively open access to the research data, too. And why we’re asking national funding bodies to do the same.” Neelie Kroes. Vice President for the Eurpoean Commission

8. 8

9. 1.Recommended open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research 2.Recommended open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research 3.Mandated open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research 4.Mandated open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research 5.Enforced, mandated open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research 6.Enforced, mandated open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research The Open Academic Tidal Wave

10. 1.Recommended open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research 2.Recommended open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research 3.Mandated open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research 4.Mandated open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research 5.Enforced, mandated open access to scholarly papers of publicly funded research 6.Enforced, mandated open access to all digital outputs of publicly funded research The Open Academic Tidal Wave

11. 2 A cloud based research data management system for academics and administrators: What is figshare? Manage their research outputs privately and securely, with controlled collaborative spaces Public repository of all research outputs from an institution, with impact and usage metrics

17. 17

18. 18

19. Some of the publishers we work with

20. 20

21. 21

24. 24 - Research Integrity - Legislative Change and Regulatory Compliance - Funders’ Policies - As well as moral and ethical obligations, putting all of your research data on figshare can help promote your research and raise your profile - It has also been reported that 'sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate’ - Simplicity - Visualisation is cool – in the format I produced it. Why?

26. 26

28. Some basic things that need to happen…

31. APIs are essential

32. Open access is essential

33. Persistent identifiers are essential

34. 34

35. 35 Institutions Generating the world’s knowledge

36. 36 "Products of research are not just publications.” NSF senior policy specialist Beth Strausser. Biographical Sketch(es), has been revised to rename the “Publications” section to “Products” and amend terminology and instructions accordingly. 13 January 2013: "National Science Foundation’s Merit Review Criteria: Review and Revisions” Chapter II.C.2.f(i)(c),

37. Advocacy

38. 38

39. Thanks for your time. @markhahnel @figshare figshare.com api.figshare.com institutions.figshare.com mark@figshare.com