1. 1 OPTN Update Brian Shepard Chief Executive Officer UNOS November 17, 2015

2. 2 Strategic Alignment

3. 3 2012 v. 2015 Goals

4. 4 Feedback from Regional Surveys

5. 5 Re-Balancing Resource Allocation 2015-2016 allocation of effort: Increase transplants 40% Provide equity30% Improve outcomes 15% Promote safety10% Promote efficiency5%

6. 2014 Committee Projects

7. 7 2015 Committee Project Portfolio

8. The New Kidney Allocation System (KAS): The First Six Months

9. Background  KAS implemented Dec 4, 2014  Key goals:  Make better use of available kidneys  Increase transplant opportunities for difficult-to-match patients (increased equity)  Increase fairness by awarding waiting time points based on dialysis start date  Have minimal impact on most candidates KAS: The First Six Months

10. Background (cont.)  Performance tracked monthly through June (“out of the gate” reports)  Comprehensive, 6-month analysis requested by the kidney committee  Pre-KAS period: June 1, 2013 – December 3, 2014 (18 months)  Post-KAS period: December 4, 2014 – May 31, 2015 (6 months) (http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov(http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov) KAS: The First Six Months

11. Solitary deceased donor transplants under KAS Pre vs. post-KAS trends Over time (per 30 days) KAS implementation On average (Total N=16,406)(Total N=5,388)  Transplant volume has increased slightly (about 1%) post-KAS. KAS: The First Six Months Table II.1a

12. Who’s getting transplanted under KAS? (1/1) Percentage of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants by Recipient Age KAS: The First Six Months  More young adults (18-49) are receiving kidney transplants.  Still, over half of transplants are going to age 50+ recipients under KAS. Eras - Pre: 18 months (June 1, 2013 – Dec 3, 2014) Post: 6 months (Dec 4, 2014 – May 31, 2015) Table 1.2a Table II.1b

13. Who’s getting transplanted under KAS? (2/2) Percentage of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants by Recipient CPRA  Transplants have increased sharply for CPRA 99-100% patients.  Transplants have declined for CPRA=0% and 80-94% patients. KAS: The First Six Months Table 1.2a Table II.1b

14. CPRA 99-100% recipient “bolus effect” KAS implementation  Transplants to CPRA 99-100% patients rose sharply after KAS but have been tapering over time, likely due to a bolus effect. KAS: The First Six Months Table A.1d

15. Who’s getting transplanted under KAS? (3/4) Percentage of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants by Recipient Duration on Dialysis  More transplants are going to long dialysis duration recipients.  Fewer preemptive (before dialysis) transplants. KAS: The First Six Months Table 1.2a Table II.1b

16. Who’s getting transplanted under KAS? (4/4) Percentage of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants by Recipient Race/ethnicity  More African Americans are receiving kidney transplants under KAS.  Transplants have also increased for Hispanics, but declined for Whites. KAS: The First Six Months Table 1.2a Table II.1b

17. Longevity-matching under KAS Percentage of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants by KDPI and Recipient Age  Transplants with KDPI 0-20% and recipient age 18-34:  Pre-KAS: 2.5% of transplants / Post-KAS: 6.7% of transplants  Transplants with KDPI 0-20% and recipient age 50+:  Pre-KAS: 10% of transplants / Post-KAS: 4% of transplants KAS: The First Six Months Table II.3b

18. Geographic distribution of kidney transplants 21.2% 32.3%  More kidneys are being distributed outside recovery OPO’s DSA. KAS: The First Six Months Table II.1b

19. Geographic distribution of kidney transplants (cont)  No significant changes by OPTN region. KAS: The First Six Months Table II.6

20. Cold ischemic times for transplanted kidneys  Average CIT increased 6% from 17.0 to 18.1 hours  CIT> 24 hours - Pre-KAS: 18.3%, Post-KAS: 22.9% KAS: The First Six Months Table II.1d (known CIT only)

21. Delayed graft function (DGF) rates  The percentage of recipients requiring dialysis within the first week after transplant increased from 24.5% pre-KAS to 30.8% after KAS. KAS: The First Six Months Table II.16

22. Kidney recovery & utilization under KAS Percentage of Recovered Deceased Kidney Donors by KDPI  Total kidney donors recovered per month increased 4% (636 to 661).  However, the distribution by KDPI has remained very similar. KAS: The First Six Months Table III.1b

23. Kidney recovery & utilization under KAS (cont) Kidney Discard Rate by KDPI -- including months 7-10 (Jun – Sep ‘15)  Discard rates have returned to pre-KAS levels in recent months. KAS: The First Six Months

24. Summary: First Six Months of KAS  Overall – KAS is meeting key goals  Highly successful 6-month pre-KAS preparation period  Decrease in longevity mismatches  Increase in the number of transplants among very highly sensitized patients  Increase in access to transplant for African Americans candidates  “Bolus effects”: the percent of transplants to CPRA 99-100% and dialysis>10 years recipients are both tapering post-KAS  Increase in A2/A2B  B transplants, but still room for growth  Transplant volume up 1% KAS: The First Six Months

25. Summary: First Six Months of KAS (cont’d)  Several trends deserve further attention:  Fewer 0MM transplants  Slight drop in pediatric transplants will continue to be tracked closely  Logistical challenges in allocation  Increased CIT and DGF  Increase in discard rates, particularly KDPI>85% kidneys. Rates appear to be returning back to pre-KAS levels based on months 7-10.  Other metrics (e.g., graft survival rates) require additional lag time and will be available in future reports KAS: The First Six Months

26. 26 Latest VCA Data

27. 27 Approved VCA Transplant Programs* as of 10/23/2015 VCA TypeN Upper Limb 17 Head and Neck 13 Abdominal Wall 12 Other Specify: Uterine 3 Other Specify: Penile 2 Other Specify: Genitourinary 1 Other Specify: Lower Limb 1 Other Specify: Urogenital 1 Other Specify: Genitourinary (Excluding Lines) 1 Total* 51 * Represents 23 unique transplant centers

28. 28 Geographic Locations of Approved VCA Transplant Centers as of 10/23/2015 Centers with at least one VCA registration currently waiting Centers with no VCA registrations currently waiting

29. 29 VCA Waiting List and Transplant Numbers as of 10/23/2015 by Type

30. 30 Other Organs Recovered from 8 VCA Donors, 7/3/2014-10/23/2015 Non-VCA OrganN Heart6 Intestine2 Kidney13 Kidney-Pancreas1 Liver8 Lung4 Pancreas1 Total35 Demographics of VCA Donors, 7/3/2014-10/23/2015 N% Age0-17225.0 18-34450.0 35-44225.0 GenderMale8100.0 EthnicityWhite675.0 Black112.5 Hispanic112.5

31. Redesigning Liver Distribution

32. 32 Redesigning Liver Distribution (cont.) The Committee unanimously resolved to consider additional results in modeling of concepts previously developed and to further analyze an additional concept… Board Resolution Concept presented to Committee Statement to the Community Development of Steering Committee Concept Paper & Questionnaire September 2014 Liver Forum Development of the Ad Hoc Subcommittees Additional Modeling and Analyses June 2015 Forum Additional Modeling and Analyses

33. 33 Metrics and quality improvement MPSC Outcomes workgroup OPO metrics Member Quality pilot Real life lessons

34. 34 Acknowledgements  Darren Stewart  John Beck  Anna Kucheryavaya  Wida Cherikh  James Alcorn  Christine Flavin

35. 35 OPTN Update Brian Shepard Chief Executive Officer UNOS November 17, 2015