Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EM Resolution Studies D. Banfi, L. Carminati (Milano), S.Paganis (Wisconsin) egamma WG, Atlas Software Week, CERN, 26-May-2005.

Published byAubrey Bell Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "EM Resolution Studies D. Banfi, L. Carminati (Milano), S.Paganis (Wisconsin) egamma WG, Atlas Software Week, CERN, 26-May-2005."— Presentation transcript:

1 EM Resolution Studies D. Banfi, L. Carminati (Milano), S.Paganis (Wisconsin) egamma WG, Atlas Software Week, CERN, 26-May-2005

2 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies2Introduction  Continue work that started last year (Slovakia Workshop), to understand in detail the origin of loss of resolution at high eta  Motivate/Study corrections which recover the nominal resolution (TDR/TBeams) Study corrections with MC Test corrections in the combined TestBeam (material scans)  Our goal here is to identify the dominant effects and NOT to propose a correction: Possible corrections will be discussed/proposed by a group of people from the LAr+egamma communities.

3 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies3 Resolution vs upstream material From Scott Snyder’s Resolution studies Confirmed by L.Flores and G.Unal with 10.0.1 X0 map of material in front of strips (SP)

4 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies4 Longitudinal Fluctuations strips e 50GeV MiddleBack PresamplerLAr CalorimeterUpstream Material  ATLAS Longitudinal weights calculated today using: Best Performance: Erec independent of Eloss (function of shower depth) TDR + offset (coming from TBeam Analysis) Longitudinal Leakage Out of cone Losses between PS and S1 Upstream Losses

5 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies5 Simulation 10.0.2:  Full Simulation: 20, 50, 100GeV electrons, photons Eta = 1.2125 (~3X0 in front of Strips) Phi = Flat or Fixed Use shower dE/dx information anywhere (calibration hits)  Calibration Hits: Energy in LAr = ‘active energy’ Energy in Passive material (i.e. Lead) = ‘inactive energy’ Energy in Cryostat, cables etc = ‘dead energy’

6 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies6 Out-of-cone fluctuations depend on shower depth ( 50GeV electrons, eta=1.2125 ): We confirm L.Carminati’s findings

7 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies7 Loss between Strips and PS also depends on depth (50GeV electrons, eta=1.2125): :

8 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies8 Longitudinal leakage vs depth

9 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies9 Accordion Sampling Fraction vs depth

10 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies10 3x7 EM Energy alas ATLAS 50GeV e  =1.88%

11 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies11 Caution: the PS weight and offset include downstream losses We obtain W0 and b by fitting Eps versus Eloss: by doing that we obtain weights very similar to the ones in ATLAS

12 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies12 What we should be doing instead is: Or even better, to correct for “out-of-cone” energy fluctuations: Presampler Linearity valid up to 3-4X0 Smaller additional corrections: Longitudinal Losses + SF correction

13 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies13 Now use the true Eloss between the S1 and PS True Eloss  =1.45%

14 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies14 Now use all cells to remove out-of-cone effects True Eloss  =1.32%

15 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies15 Now use all cells and ATLAS calibration  =1.74%

16 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies16 Summary of EM Resolution Loss at eta=1.2125 Electron Energy 20GeV50GeV 3x7 EM Resolution 2.88%1.88% 3x7 EM Resolution no losses between PS and S1 2.23%1.45% Approx. Optimum EM Resolution (*) 2.12%1.32% Loss due to Eloss between S1 and PS -23%-23% Loss due to out-of-cone fluctuations -5%-9% (*) Only dE/dx, i.e. no noise, no pile-up, no charge effects etc. ~9.5%/sqrt(E)

17 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies17 Resolution vs Depth for 3x7 clusters ( 50GeV electrons, eta=1.2125 ) Strong correlation between resolution and shower depth when we reconstruct using the present ATLAS parametrization Weak correlation between resolution and shower depth when we remove the effects of Elosses between Strips and PS

18 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies18 Eloss between S1-PS from TestBeam sqrt parametrization (T.Carli) Eloss from TBeam parametrization  =1.66% Significant (12%) improvement!

19 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies19 Photons ( L.Carminati @Slovakia ) Presampler Weight W0 is 10% less for photons. The accordion SF is the same for electrons and photons. This explains why the photons in ATLAS today are overcorrected by about ~1% (we use electron calibration).

20 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies20Summary  EM energy resolution deteriorates at high eta due to the presence of upstream material which significantly increases fluctuations of energy losses.  At eta=1.2 we found for electrons ~23% resolution loss due to fluct. of Eloss between PS-S1 ~9% resolution loss due to fluct. of Eloss out-of-cone  Fluctuations correlate with (a definition of) the shower depth.  Test-beam material scans very important for testing potential corrections.

21 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies21 Supporting Viewgraphs

22 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies22 Presampler Linearity at eta=1.2125 Offset=160MeV W0=4.911

23 26-May-2005EM Resolution Studies23 Sqrt correction from TBeam 02

Download ppt "EM Resolution Studies D. Banfi, L. Carminati (Milano), S.Paganis (Wisconsin) egamma WG, Atlas Software Week, CERN, 26-May-2005."

Similar presentations

Status of CTB04 electron data vs MC analysis Stathes Paganis (Sheffield) Martin Aleksa (CERN) Isabelle Wingerter (LAPP) LAr Week, Cargnano, Italy 13-Sep-05.

Status of CTB04 electron data vs MC analysis Stathes Paganis (Sheffield) Martin Aleksa (CERN) Isabelle Wingerter (LAPP) LAr Week, Cargnano, Italy 13-Sep-05.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.

The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC (work in progress) S.Paganis (Wisconsin) withIsabelle,Martin LAr+Tile H8 pion CTB Meeting, CERN, 19-April-2005.

LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC (work in progress) S.Paganis (Wisconsin) withIsabelle,Martin LAr+Tile H8 pion CTB Meeting, CERN, 19-April-2005.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.

INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
1 physics reaction of interest (parton level) lost soft tracks due to magnetic field added tracks from in-time (same trigger) pile-up event added tracks.

1 physics reaction of interest (parton level) lost soft tracks due to magnetic field added tracks from in-time (same trigger) pile-up event added tracks.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.

1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.

Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
17 May 2007LCWS analysis1 LCWS physics analysis work Paul Dauncey.

17 May 2007LCWS analysis1 LCWS physics analysis work Paul Dauncey.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.

Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, 1999 - Study.

My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab 2006-06-08 Rikard Sandström.

1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.

Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.

Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.

W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.

Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.

Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November 11 - 15, 2013.

Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November , 2013.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.

Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC S.Paganis (Wisconsin) with Isabelle Winterger,Martin Aleksa LAr Week CTB Meeting, CERN, 10-May-2005.

LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC S.Paganis (Wisconsin) with Isabelle Winterger,Martin Aleksa LAr Week CTB Meeting, CERN, 10-May-2005.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.

Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google