Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Purchasing Power Parity A Survey on East European Countries (1995-2001) Ioana Ceanga.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Purchasing Power Parity A Survey on East European Countries (1995-2001) Ioana Ceanga."— Presentation transcript:

1 Purchasing Power Parity A Survey on East European Countries (1995-2001) Ioana Ceanga

2  The Theory of Purchasing Power Parity -arbitrage across goods markets -Law of One Price (LoOP)  absolute PPP:

3 - absolute form of PPP in logarithm - semi-strong form of PPP - relative form of PPP  The Theory of Purchasing Power Parity - the weak form of PPP

4 - Absolute PPP cannot be taken as instantaneous equality – it is a guide to long-run behavior of exchange rate - real exchange rate  q = s + p * - p  The Theory of Purchasing Power Parity

5 - If PPP is to hold in the long-run, the real exchange rate should be stationary - One way to test the stationarity of it is to find a cointegration relationship between the nominal exchange rate and the prices - Cointegration framework

6 Data and methods - bilateral exchange rates (ROL/USD, CZK/USD, PLZ/USD, HUF/USD)  monthly average - consumer price indexes (Romania, Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary)  set to 100 in December 1994 - consumer price index for United States  set to 100 in December 1994 Covered period: 1995:01-2001:12 (72 observations)

7 Data and methods - unit root tests for determining the order of integration - Johansen test for establishing if there are cointegration relationships in case of the absolute and semi-strong forms of PPP - Ordinary Least Squares Method and Wald test in case of the relative form of PPP

8 Testing the strong form of PPP - testing the existence of long-run relationships between nominal exchange rates and consumer price indexes using the cointegration techniques - verifying the size of the CPI’s coefficients

9 Testing for ROL/USD exchange rate Results: 5 lags in differences included speed of adjustments coefficients: (-0.291 0.045 0.006)

10 Testing for CZK/USD exchange rate Results: 1 lag in differences included speed of adjustments coefficients: (-0.007 0.009 0.004)

11 Testing for PLZ/USD exchange rate Results: 7 lags in differences included speed of adjustments coefficients: (-0.040 0.061 0.003)

12 Testing for HUF/USD exchange rate Results: 9 lags in differences included speed of adjustments coefficients: (-0.237 -0.050 0.00008)

13 Testing the semi-strong form of PPP Why should the assumptions of PPP be relaxed? Different weights in the construction of price indexes The price index comprises both tradables and non-tradables Measurement errors Transportation costs Non-homogeneity of goods, tariff barriers where

14 Testing for ROL/USD exchange rate Results: 3 lags in differences included Trace test indicates no cointegration at both 5% and 1% levels

15 Testing for CZK/USD exchange rate Results: 1 lag in differences included The null of no cointegration cannot be rejected

16 Testing for PLZ/USD exchange rate Results: 6 lags in differences included speed of adjustments coefficients: (0.014 0.073)

17 Testing for HUF/USD exchange rate Results: 7 lags in differences included speed of adjustments coefficients: (-0.005 0.037)

18 Testing the relative form of PPP - implies an OLS estimation for the equation: - applying Wald test in order to check if the coefficients estimated can be 1 or -1 - states that the proportionate change in the exchange rate is a function of the difference in the proportionate changes in home and foreign prices

19 Testing for ROL/USD exchange rate Wald testnull hypothesis: c(1)=1, c(2)=-1 F-statistic2.934718Probability0.059117 Chi-square5.869436Probability0.053146

20 Testing for CZK/USD exchange rate Wald testnull hypothesis: c(1)=1, c(2)=-1 F-statistic60.35474Probability0.000000 Chi-square120.7095Probability0.000000

21 Testing for PLZ/USD exchange rate Wald testnull hypothesis: c(1)=1, c(2)=-1 F-statistic8.293522Probability0.000542 Chi-square16.58704Probability0.000250

22 Testing for HUF/USD exchange rate Wald testnull hypothesis: c(1)=1, c(2)=-1 F-statistic1.958467Probability0.147780 Chi-square3.916934Probability0.141075

23 Conclusions - the assumption of no transaction costs is unrealistic - the lack of commercial barriers is not found in real life - the intervention of central banks - the costs of non-traded goods - imperfect information - the participation of other traders in the FOREX market PPP theory in all the forms studied does not hold


Download ppt "Purchasing Power Parity A Survey on East European Countries (1995-2001) Ioana Ceanga."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google