1. Conventional Construction Working Group Meeting Tom Lackowski L2 Conventional Facilities (tomski@fnal.gov)tomski@fnal.gov 630.840.3640 Mu2e Working Group May 19, 2010 1

2. Overview Overview of Work to Date. ◦ Project Definition Reports Current Building Concept Requirements Costs Issues Summary Mu2e Working Group May 19, 20102

3. Project Definition Reports for September 2008 and May 2009 located in Doc DB #357. Sites that extracted beam at AP 60 were studied. Site near AP 20 at same location as the original P-Bar source tune up beam. Mu2e Working Group May 19, 20103 ANTIPROTON SOURCE 8 GeV Booster AP 60 AP 20 Alt. 2 Site GIESSE ROAD Alt. 1 Site Study Site

4. Alt. One Siting Beam Extracted at AP-60 routed west. Deep Beamline to transverse Indian Creek ◦ Potential Wetland Issues ◦ Disturb woods adjacent to creek Mu2e Working Group May 19, 20104

5. Alt. One Site Plan Services Routed from Main Injector/Mini BooNe Greenfield site Beamline interrupted by Indian Creek Mu2e Working Group May 19, 20105

6. Alt. One Detector Hall Plan Mu2e Working Group May 19, 20106

7. Alt One Summary Detector situated under crane, massive amount of shielding blocks used for 21 Feet of Cosmic Shielding Construction estimated at 18 months Loaded Construction cost estimated at $41 Mil 30% Contingency Risks included: ◦ Wetlands / Flood Plain ◦ Programmatic Requirements ◦ Subsurface Characteristics Mu2e Working Group May 19, 20107

8. Alt. Two Siting Beam Extracted at AP-20. Mu2e Working Group May 19, 20108

9. Alt. Two Site Plan Services Routed from CUB/ Antiproton Previously disturbed site Mu2e Working Group May 19, 20109

10. Alt. Two Detector Hall Plan Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201010 Detector Level Plan

11. Alt. One Detector Hall Plan Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201011 Grade Level Plan

12. Alt Two Summary Detector situated under two crane runways, 12 Feet of Cosmic Shielding Construction estimated at 18 months Loaded Construction cost estimated at $26 Mil 34% Contingency Risks included: ◦ Programmatic Requirements ◦ Subsurface Characteristics Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201012

13. Current Site Plan Mu2e Working Group May 21, 201013

14. Site Plan Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201014

15. Detector Level Plan Mu2e Working Group May 21, 201015 ASSEMBLY AREA DUMP TARGET CELL WORK AREA / PRODUCTION SOLENOID TRANSPORT ASSEMBLY AREA 2 PRODUCTION DETECTOR BEAMLINE ELECTRONICS TRANSPORT

16. Grade Level Plan Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201016 TRUCK BAY ASSEMBLY AREA BELOW UPPER STAGING AREA ASSEMBLE AREA 2 BELOW ELECTRICAL, / MECHANICAL / CONTROLS CRYO SUPPORT

17. Section @ PS Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201017

18. Section @ DS Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201018

19. Longitudinal Section Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201019

20. Beamline Purpose: To house beamline equipment that transports beam from AntiProton Source to Production Solenoid. 8’ wide x 8 ‘ high enclosure.(256 meters long) Constructed on cast-in-place concrete base slab using cut and cover excavation methods. 21’ Shielding (not confirmed) Personnel egress via stairs at each end; equipment access via shielded hatch Location for Power Supplies not yet determined; may require a Service Building. Mu2e Working Group May 21, 201020

21. Requirements / Specifications Requirements / Specifications are acquired from the Project Team via: ◦ Weekly Tech Board Meetings ◦ Weekly Conventional Coordination Meetings ◦ Bi-weekly Beamline Meetings There is still a lot of work to develop a credible CDR. We will need to have either firm specifications or agreed upon placeholders by mid August to complete the scope drawings, system designs, cost estimate and schedule. This seems probable from the discussions so far. Requirements document in progress. Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201021

22. Environmental / Life Safety Environmental / Life Safety The Conventional Construction aspects of the project is expected to conform to an existing CX. A RFP for environmental investigation and delineation of the wetlands along Indian Creek has been issued. If for some other reason (like beam energy) an EA is required then the Conventional Facilities will need to address all environmental impacts. Initial review with Life Safety Consultant, Schirmer Engineering. Need to firm up elevations before formal review. ODH mitigation discussed, will be developed with cryo and solenoid design. Primary Beam Shielding Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201022

23. Other L2 Management Docs Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201023 Preliminary Risk Registry WBS Integral Project Team

24. Costs Costs appear to be moving in upwards direction from the May 2009 PDR. Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201024

25. Cost Breakdown Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201025

26. Issues Buildings “Architectural Significance” Road Patterns Beam Shutdown Construction Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201026 “if we produced a dowdy site with shabby buildings, then the technical people we wanted to work with us would not come and the statesmen, who might judge us in part by appearances, would not, in the long run, give us the funds we would need for our physics.” “Starting Fermilab”, Robert Rathbun Wilson, 1992

27. Summary A concept for the design of the Detector Hall has been developed. The type of construction is typical at Fermilab. Low to medium risks are anticipated. No known significant environmental risks. Project Team providing requirements and feedback on overall design; system specific criteria development needed. Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201027

28. Thank you for your attention. Questions? Mu2e Working Group May 19, 201028