Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EE 3220: Digital Communication

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EE 3220: Digital Communication"— Presentation transcript:

1 EE 3220: Digital Communication
Lec-8: Error performance of bandpass modulation Dr. Hassan Yousif Ahmed Department of Electrical Engineering College of Engineering at Wadi Aldwasser Slman bin Abdulaziz University Dr Hassan Yousif

2 Last time we talked about:
Some bandpass modulation schemes M-PAM, M-PSK, M-FSK, M-QAM How to perform coherent and non-coherent detection Dr Hassan Yousif

3 Example of two dim. modulation
“110” “000” “001” “011” “010” “101” “111” “100” 16QAM “0000” “0001” “0011” “0010” 1 3 -1 -3 “1000” “1001” “1011” “1010” “1100” “1101” “1111” “1110” “0100” “0101” “0111” “0110” 8PSK “00” “11” “10” “01” QPSK Dr Hassan Yousif

4 Today, we are going to talk about:
How to calculate the average probability of symbol error for different modulation schemes that we studied? How to compare different modulation schemes based on their error performances? Dr Hassan Yousif

5 Error probability of bandpass modulation
Before evaluating the error probability, it is important to remember that: The type of modulation and detection ( coherent or non- coherent) determines the structure of the decision circuits and hence the decision variable, denoted by z. The decision variable, z, is compared with M-1 thresholds, corresponding to M decision regions for detection purposes. Decision Circuits Compare z with threshold. Dr Hassan Yousif

6 Error probability … The matched filters output (observation vector= ) is the detector input and the decision variable is a function of , i.e. For MPAM, MQAM and MFSK with coherent detection For MPSK with coherent detection For non-coherent detection (M-FSK and DPSK), We know that for calculating the average probability of symbol error, we need to determine Hence, we need to know the statistics of z, which depends on the modulation scheme and the detection type. Dr Hassan Yousif

7 Error probability … AWGN channel model:
The signal vector is deterministic. The elements of the noise vector are i.i.d Gaussian random variables with zero-mean and variance The noise vector's pdf is The elements of the observed vector are independent Gaussian random variables. Its pdf is Dr Hassan Yousif

8 Error probability … BPSK and BFSK with coherent detection: “0” “1” “0”
Dr Hassan Yousif

9 Error probability … Non-coherent detection of BFSK Decision variable:
Difference of envelopes + - Decision rule: Dr Hassan Yousif

10 Error probability – cont’d
Non-coherent detection of BFSK … Similarly, non-coherent detection of DBPSK Rician pdf Rayleigh pdf Dr Hassan Yousif

11 (Compare with M-1 thresholds)‏
Error probability …. Coherent detection of M-PAM Decision variable: “00” “01” “11” “10” 4-PAM ML detector (Compare with M-1 thresholds)‏ Dr Hassan Yousif

12 Error probability …. Coherent detection of M-PAM ….
Error happens if the noise, , exceeds in amplitude one-half of the distance between adjacent symbols. For symbols on the border, error can happen only in one direction. Hence: Gaussian pdf with zero mean and variance Dr Hassan Yousif

13 Error probability … Coherent detection of M-QAM ML detector
“0000” “0001” “0011” “0010” “1000” “1001” “1011” “1010” “1100” “1101” “1111” “1110” “0100” “0101” “0111” “0110” 16-QAM ML detector Parallel-to-serial converter Dr Hassan Yousif

14 Average probability of
Error probability … Coherent detection of M-QAM … M-QAM can be viewed as the combination of two modulations on I and Q branches, respectively. No error occurs if no error is detected on either the I or the Q branch. Considering the symmetry of the signal space and the orthogonality of the I and Q branches: Average probability of symbol error for Dr Hassan Yousif

15 Error probability … Coherent detection of MPSK Compute Choose smallest
“110” “000” “001” “011” “010” “101” “111” “100” 8-PSK Compute Choose smallest Decision variable Dr Hassan Yousif

16 Error probability … Coherent detection of MPSK …
The detector compares the phase of observation vector to M-1 thresholds. Due to the circular symmetry of the signal space, we have: where It can be shown that or Dr Hassan Yousif

17 Error probability … Coherent detection of M-FSK ML detector: Choose
the largest element in the observed vector Dr Hassan Yousif

18 Error probability … Coherent detection of M-FSK …
The dimension of the signal space is M. An upper bound for the average symbol error probability can be obtained by using the union bound. Hence: or, equivalently Dr Hassan Yousif

19 Bit error probability versus symbol error probability
Number of bits per symbol For orthogonal M-ary signaling (M-FSK)‏ For M-PSK, M-PAM and M-QAM Dr Hassan Yousif

20 Probability of symbol error for binary modulation
Note! “The same average symbol energy for different sizes of signal space” Dr Hassan Yousif

21 Probability of symbol error for M-PSK
Note! “The same average symbol energy for different sizes of signal space” Dr Hassan Yousif

22 Probability of symbol error for M-FSK
Note! “The same average symbol energy for different sizes of signal space” Dr Hassan Yousif

23 Probability of symbol error for M-PAM
Note! “The same average symbol energy for different sizes of signal space” Dr Hassan Yousif

24 Probability of symbol error for M-QAM
Note! “The same average symbol energy for different sizes of signal space” Dr Hassan Yousif

25 Example of samples of matched filter output for some bandpass modulation schemes
Dr Hassan Yousif


Download ppt "EE 3220: Digital Communication"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google