Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Branching in Biological Models of Computation Blair Andres-Beck, Vera Bereg, Stephanie Lee, Mike Lindmark, Wojciech Makowiecki Mike Lindmark, Wojciech.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Branching in Biological Models of Computation Blair Andres-Beck, Vera Bereg, Stephanie Lee, Mike Lindmark, Wojciech Makowiecki Mike Lindmark, Wojciech."— Presentation transcript:

1 Branching in Biological Models of Computation Blair Andres-Beck, Vera Bereg, Stephanie Lee, Mike Lindmark, Wojciech Makowiecki Mike Lindmark, Wojciech Makowiecki

2 Branching in DNA Computation We chose several models of DNA computation and examined the implementation of if…else statements and looping Allow easier mapping of conventional algorithms

3 Design Criteria Any change must preserve the existing functionality of the model Branching –Operation selection based on current data and instruction Looping –Further instructions based on test condition –Nested loops; that is, looping that doesn’t rely on a single marker

4 The Sticker Model Presented in “ (1996) Presented in “A Sticker Based Model for DNA Computation” (1996) Two types of single stranded DNA molecules –memory strand –complimentary stickers Four operations allow universal computation –set, clear, separate and combine

5 Bit Representation

6 Set and Clear

7 Combine and Separate

8 Simple branching and looping in the Sticker Model Idea: use current mechanical operations to do branching (if else) and looping

9 Branching with existing operations Perform a separate based on branch condition Act on each vial independently –“If” statement carried out on true, “else” on false Recombine vials after “if” statement

10 Branching and Looping procedures

11 Looping with existing operations Test for loop condition –Fluorescent markers Can be detected by the robotic assistant Can have more than one type, allowing nested looping Choose next instruction based on presence or absence of fluorescence Problems –Slow –Reliance on intervention outside the model

12 Implementation of Branching in DNA Transcriptional Logic Idea: use an OR gate for branching Idea: use an OR gate for branching

13 DNA Transcriptional Logic How it works –Transcription factor binds to the promoter region –Activates the enzyme RNA Polymerase [RNAP] –Unzips DNA and produces programmable output

14 Implementation of Branching The OR gate allows the if-else statement to end and the program to continue

15 Definition of Branching Branching allows for conditional if-else statements { if (condition) {output 1}; else {output 2}; } continuation …

16 Properties of the Branching Pros –Easy to track progress –Does not require outside intervention Cons –Does not allow parallelism –Inefficient and fairly slow –Requires large number of promoter -transcription factor pairs

17 “Smart” drug or DNA automata combined with Sticker Model Idea: use “if else” statements from “Smart” drug model (with stickers instead of drugs)

18 Automata Automata –Machine that accepts strings over specific alphabet that are in its language –Computation terminates on processing last string symbol –Accepts input if terminates in accepting state

19 “Smart” Drug Automata with: –Hardware (restriction nuclease, ligase) –Software (dsDNA with a hairpin structure at end) –In vitro

20 “Smart” Drug Basic Idea: transport diagnosis and drug delivery (suppression) stages into the cell No robotic intervention what-so-ever Basic “if else” statements, thus can do branching! Basic “if else” statements, thus can do branching!

21 “Smart” Drug

22 “Smart” drug and Sticker Model Sticker model: –Memory strand with on/off regions for bits Drug model: –Code with a sticker as hairpin (software) –Reusable “rules” (hardware) –If (rule=true)  release sticker –Can do anti-stickers to clear off bits as well –Can do anti-stickers to clear off bits as well Thus SISD model By varying code and subset of “rules” can change the outcome of the computation

23 Pros and Cons Less mechanical operations used –Separation procedure might not be needed –Could possibly get rid of them all together? Eliminates one of the positive sides of sticker model (no enzymes), but our enzymes are reusable (hardware) Have SISD, can do MIMD? How to ensure that each code is related to its specific data molecule?

24 Branching in the Sticker Model using DNA Instructions The Idea: Store the program with the data, run all the programs independently.

25 Basic Ideas Encode instructions into DNA Create a DNA program counter Each DNA computes cycle: –Separate strands based on next instruction –Perform operation –Increment PC

26 Changes to the Sticker Model Instruction strand = head + instruction + … + data connector Instruction = instr code + operand code

27 Changes to the Sticker Model Add connector to data strand Addition of PC strands

28 Changes to the Sticker Model Introduction of halt No explicit combine or separate operations Use of operation selectors

29 Adding Looping Looping by restarting the PC Loop operation –Clears off PC using complement PC strands if (stage1) { … if (NOT done) { loop;}… stage1 = false; }

30 Adding Branching Add IF instruction code Use End-If IF operation Operation selectors with solid-bound stickers Trapped strands enter branching cycle –Addition of excess PC and Step strands (excluding PC End-If IF strands) –Flow by End-If IF selectors –Return trapped strands

31 The Strands

32 Advantages Reusability of data, pc, start, step, and selector strands Simple programmability –Imagine building strand from instruction pieces Ability to run more than one program concurrently –Thousands of problems at the same time

33 Disadvantages Large error rate vs. long cycle time –Must perform several separations per cycle No ability to do error correction Large number of unique sequences needed

34 References A Sticker Based Architecture for DNA Computation. Roweis, Sam, et. al. 7/96. Lauria, Mario, Kaustubh Bhalerao, Muthu M. Pugalanthiran, and Bo Yuan. “Building blocks of a biochemical CPU based on DNA transcription logic.” 3rd Workshop on Non-Silicon Computation (NSC-3), Munich, June 2004. Molecular Beacons: A Novel DNA Probe for Nucleic Acid and Protein Studies. W. Tan et al. Molecular beacons attached to glass beads fluoresce upon hybridization to target DNA. L.Brown et al. Automata Make Antisense. Condon, Anne. Nature, vol 429, p351. Programmable and Autonomous Computing Machine Made of Biomolecules. Y. Benenson, T. Paz-Elizur, R. Adar, E. Keinan, Z. Livneh, E. Shapiro. Nature, vol. 414, p430. An Autonomous Molecular Computer for Logical Control of Gene Expression. Y. Benenson, B. Gil, U. Ben-Dor, R. Adar, E. Shapiro. Nature, vol.429, p432.

35

36 The Strands

37 Execution Cycle Revisited Initial Setup –Random input bits set –Add instruction strands, start strands Execution Cycle –Flow strands by operation selector chambers –Seal chambers, perform operation –Collect, add PC strands –Wash PC strands, add step strands

38 Adding Branching Add IF instruction code where operand is the condition bit Use End-If IF operation Operation selectors with solid-bound stickers Proper length to require both connections to stick

39 Adding Branching Trapped strands enter branching cycle –Addition of excess PC and Step strands (excluding PC End-If IF strands) –Flow by End-If IF selectors –Return trapped strands Simple to get OR and NOT conditions –ie. OR = clear c; set n; if a; set c; end-if if n; if b; set c; end-if if n;

40 Fluorescent markers


Download ppt "Branching in Biological Models of Computation Blair Andres-Beck, Vera Bereg, Stephanie Lee, Mike Lindmark, Wojciech Makowiecki Mike Lindmark, Wojciech."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google