1. MOIMS Area Report N. Peccia ESA R. ThompsonBNSC

2. MOIMS Reportp. 2CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Attendance to the MOIMS Meetings Diversity FactorSM&C6 Agencies NAV5 Agencies DAI / IPR4 Agencies

3. MOIMS Reportp. 3CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS DAI WG Report DATA ARCHIVE INGESTION WG Goal: Develop a CCSDS/ISO standard for a Submission Information Package (SIP) for transfer and validation of information submitted to an archive Goal : Determine the need to update the OAIS Reference Model for the 5-year reviews Working Group Status: Active __X_ Idle ____ Working Group Summary Situation:

4. MOIMS Reportp. 4CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS DAI WG Report Working Group Summary progress:  A list of issues with the draft Producer Archive Interface Standard (PAIS) Red Book were reviewed and most were resolved. Updates needed to the XML schema, for describing data objects to be transferred to the archive, have been identified. Preliminary mapping of PAIS / SIP attributes to the XFDU standard have been identified, but completing this is the major technical work remaining. The outline for the Green Book has been agreed.  Review of comments received on the need to update the OAIS reference model have lead to a decision to do a minimal update to clarify some terms and concepts.  Schedule (major deliverables only) Draft PAIS Red Book, with Green Book, ready for formal review: 30 June 2007 Updated OAIS reference model, ready for formal review: 10 October 2007  Charter updated

5. MOIMS Reportp. 5CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS DAI WG Report CROSS-AREA TECHNICAL ISSUES  We will look to adopt guidance on XML schema expression as put forward by the CCSDS XML SIG. Other Issues and concerns  Registration Fees for meetings Uniformly negative response  WGs Allow individual WGs to meet as needed, at agency facilities, as long as they have multiple agency participation. Perhaps hold Plenary every 2 years, and allow cross-support meetings as needed, but encourage telecons, videocons (e.g.,megameeting) Resolution  In response to the 5-year ISO review of the OAIS reference model, verify that we can put the updated document into ISO for review as a final draft international standard (FDIS). If not, clarify what would be the ISO document status

6. MOIMS Reportp. 6CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS IPR WG Report Information Packaging and Registries (IPR) Working Group The purpose of this Working Group is to:  Collect use cases from the space operations community and develop requirements for XML data packaging:  Develop a set of recommendations that specify an extensible framework for packaging data and metadata  Oversee the development of at least two implementations of the packaging framework and associated with usability and interoperability tests in many areas of space data systems  Based on testing experience and requirements from various Space Data and Operations Groups, establish extensible registry / repository architectures that leverage the more widely based registry work such as ebXML and UDDI.  Develop specific Registry/Repository standards that support the data packaging registry/repository requirements focusing on the support of XML Schemas and associated XML objects

7. MOIMS Reportp. 7CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS IPR WG Report XFDU Schedule:  Draft Green Book Issue 1 for Panel Review1 st March 2007  Panel Review Comments Due 1 st April 2007  XFDU RB RIDs from Agency Review Due1 st May 2007  XFDU RIDs Responses Review Telecon1 st June 2007  XFDU BB / GB CESG Submissions 15 th June 2007  Resolution of any Agency Blue Book Comments 1 st Oct 2007 XML Schema Registries Schedule:  Use Cases and Requirements on CCSDS Usage of XML Schema Registries15 th March 2007  White Papers and Agency Prototypes on CCSDS Schema Registries 1 st October 2007  Draft White Book(s) on CCSDS XSD Registry 1 st Jan 2008  XML Schema Registry White Book and Prototypes 1 st July 2008  XML Schema Red Book/Green Book/Reference Implementation for CESG Review 1 st Mar 2009  If significant RIDS are received on the XFDU Red Book this schedule may be impacted

8. MOIMS Reportp. 8CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS IPR WG Report ISSUES  IPR has received resource commitments from member agencies to develop an XML Schema Registry Recommendation and implementations which are needed both for XFDU deployment and coordination of the rapidly growing XML schema volume within the agencies.  The IPR WG agrees that a common Registry / Repository Service Architecture is needed within CCSDS and will provide full support for a CCSDS wide effort to establish a preliminary version of this Architecture.  However, due to critical needs of IPR member agencies for an XML Schema registry the IPR support of the Architecture effort is available for the period from 1 st Feb 2007 to 31st May 2007 at which time those resources will be applied to the development of a CCSDS Recommendation for an XML Schema Registry / Repository that specialize the CCSDS Registry/Repository Service Architecture.  The resulting interfaces and data structures can then be used to validate/modify the CCSDS Registry / Repository Service Architecture

9. MOIMS Reportp. 9CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS NAV WG Report NAVIGATION WG Goal: Development of standards for interagency exchange of data required for spacecraft tracking and attitude/orbit determination.

10. MOIMS Reportp. 10CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS NAV WG Report SUMMARY TECHNICAL STATUS Jan 2007 accomplishments  Completed review / update of Working Group Charter according to current understandings  Completed review of ADM Red Book 1.4 updates and resolved a number of open issues.  Completed review of TDM Red Book 2.0 early RID’s and a few open issues.  Completed discussion of NDM/XML Red Book 1.2 and XML related issues  Completed high level plan for the ADM Prototyping effort (GFSC, CNES, JAXA)  Completed high level plan for the TDM Prototyping effort (JPL, DLR, ESA)  Completed extensive and detailed discussions of unit discrepancies in the group’s Recommendations (ADM, ODM, TDM)  Completed discussions with the ISO TC20/SC14 Liaison Dave Finkleman and colleagues on the topic of standards for collaborative operations in Earth orbit. ODM updates to accommodate these needs are in draft status.

11. MOIMS Reportp. 11CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS NAV WG Report CROSS-AREA TECHNICAL ISSUES  XML Harmonization: More emphasis on harmonization of XML issues across the CCSDS as a whole is highly desirable (e.g., common data elements that pervade space operations). It would be good for the XSG SIG/WG to address this in due course. OTHER ISSUES AND CONCERNS  CCSDS Strategic Planning Better communication / coordination above and beyond the WG and Area are needed (e.g., we have on several occasions experienced changes in requirements –XML- that necessitated additional effort and caused delays in documents).  Registration fees for big meetings?: Mixed opinion. The group felt that by changing the meeting schedule to a single “combined Area” meeting per year, with the individual Areas meeting one more time in smaller venues, the agency burden to support two meetings a year could be reduced. The requirement for coordination between Navigation and other Areas, as is facilitated by a large meeting, has been relatively low.  Scheduling of Meetings: More flexibility for working group for arranging meetings would be good (1 big / 1 smaller & more flexible). A smaller Area-oriented meeting could better avoid holiday weeks, reduce logistics issues, avoid working on Saturdays, reduce weather risks, etc.

12. MOIMS Reportp. 12CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS NAV WG Report ISO TC20 / SC13 + SC14 Collaboration We are engaged in ongoing discussion with SC14 / WG3 regarding new requirements on ODM. Discussions in these Winter meetings were collegial and positive. Several agreements were reached, but there is still some internal resistance in WG. Orbit Data Messages (ODM) updates to accommodate SC14/WG3 needs are in draft status (Issue by March 15, 2007, Reviewed by April 1 st, 2007)  A new message be added to the Orbit Data Message Standard, name to be determined.  The message include elements of data from which canonical TLE’s may be constructed.  The message include a 6x6 covariance matrix abstraction.  Metadata include covariance solve-fors, but values beyond the 6x6 abstraction need not be provided  Information that cannot be described precisely enough be included in  optional fields and not in normative requirements Risk: 2 competing standards for orbit descriptions between the 2 ISO Subcommittees. Resolving the internal differences is a high priority. Idea of TC20/SC14/WG3 suspending their effort on ISO/AWI 26885.TO DATE, UNACCEPTABLE TO TC20/SC14 SC14/WG3 Liaison still lists the following outstanding issues:  Should there be two additional message types in 22644 or just one?  Should there be one standard, ISO 22644, or two mutually consistent standards, one emphasizing content and the format for that content, the other emphasizing elements of information? Should TLE’s be institutionalized at all?

13. MOIMS Reportp. 13CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS NAV WG Report ISO TC20 / SC13 + SC14 Collaboration - Conclusions  CCSDS Nav WG is following the Activity Plan developed cooperatively with the SC14/WG3 at Rome in 2006  Good progress is being made  Some issues which must resolved remain, thus technical collaboration should continue  Multiple standards for orbit data description are not in the interest of SC14, SC13, the ISO overall, or the potential user community (agencies and other satellite operators)  Current ISO Standard for orbit data description is ISO 22644, Orbit Data Messages; it is being modified by the Nav WG to accommodate SC14/WG3 requirements Spring 2008 Release enhanced ODM version (Pink Book) for CCSDS review Summer 2008 Conduct prototype exercises Fall 2008 Establish and publish enhanced ODM Blue Book  ISO/AWI 26885 work should be suspended, freeing the SC14/WG3 to work on the many other elements of their Technical Program

14. MOIMS Reportp. 14CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS NAV WG Report RESOLUTIONS  RESOLUTION 1 The Navigation WG is thankful to the CESG / CMC for making firm announcements about date / location of upcoming meetings. This helps us all plan better.  RESOLUTION 2 The Navigation WG is pleased to express appreciation to NASA for their excellent hosting of this workshop, the AIAA for the excellent logistics support, and El Pomar Foundation for the use of the superb Penrose House facilities.

15. MOIMS Reportp. 15CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 MOIMS SM&C WG Number of attendees Average Attendance to the SM&C Meetings

16. MOIMS Reportp. 16CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Proposed (WG chair) Goals for this Workshop Identification of common SM&C approach with NASA within CCSDS  Achieved: see next slide Trade-off between Messaging Protocols (e.g. AMS, JMS, etc.)  Achieved: SM&C architecture allows use of several messaging systems Successful initial demonstration of SM&C Prototype  Achieved Agree on way forward on draft high priority RBs towards a target Agency Review in 2nd half 2007  Achieved: see next slide

17. MOIMS Reportp. 17CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Common SM&C Approach with NASA Very constructive participation Agreed new books organisation Agreed contents of SM&C Protocol Agreed schedule for BBs publication  Messaging Abstraction Layer BB: end Dec 2007  Common Services BB: Mar 2008  Core Services BB: Mar 2008

18. MOIMS Reportp. 18CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 XTCE Awaiting for OMG approval Started prototype mapping of Space Shuttle operational database to XTCE.  High confidence that XTCE would work for future programs (e.g. CEV) MB update available in Q2/2007

19. MOIMS Reportp. 19CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Resolutions The SM&C resolve to request approval of the new WG charter (update of book organisation and schedule) The SM&C resolve to request confirmation to CESG that, after demonstration of SM&C prototype V1 in Rome and SM&C prototype V2 in Colorado Springs, the CCSDS requirements for prototyping are fulfilled

20. MOIMS Reportp. 20CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Open Points / Matter of Interest SM&C Charter  No response from CESG CCSDS Web Site Improvement  Add statistics on books  Book planning information  Missing procedure/tool to allow submission and recording of problems encountered by users of CCSDS standards  Map missions and usage of specific standards (see IOAG network infusion progress)

21. MOIMS Reportp. 21CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Digital Repository Audit and Certification BOF Goal  Obtain CCSDS / ISO approval of a standard that establishes the criteria that a repository / archive must meet to be designated an ISO Trusted Digital Repository. Mailing list moims-rac set up, 103 members already BoF meeting held, with 26 participants (including telecon & videocon)  Agencies: BNSC, CNES, ESA, NASA  Others: Center for Research Libraries (CRL) U North Carolina Lockheed Martin UK Digital Curation Centre (DCC) CCLRC, UK UOL, Brazil Smithsonian Institution Archives Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), U Columbia IPCSR U of California, Office of the President NARA/ U Maryland Dutch National Library (KB), Netherlands Humboldt University, Berlin Charter agreed by BoF

22. MOIMS Reportp. 22CESG-CMC Meeting 23 / 24 Jan 2007 Digital Repository Audit and Certification BOF Issues / Actions  CESG / CMC will investigate the best way to undertake parallel reviews in CCSDS and ISO (e.g. creation of new ISO work item)  CMC / ISO Liaison will investigate guidelines for ISO accreditation and certification