Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Problem based Learning in Engineering and Science – Development of Facilitator A Course given by: Xiangyun Du Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Problem based Learning in Engineering and Science – Development of Facilitator A Course given by: Xiangyun Du Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Problem based Learning in Engineering and Science – Development of Facilitator A Course given by: Xiangyun Du Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy Fibigerstraede 10, DK - 9220 Aalborg East Phone: + 45 99408353, e-mail: xiangyun@learning.aau.dk Lars Peter Jensen Department of Control Engineering Fredrik Bajers Vej 7C, DK - 9220 Aalborg East Phone: + 45 99408740, e-mail: lpj@es.aau.dk URL: http://es.aau.dk/staff/lpj Associated Professors at Aalborg University

2 Tuesday, the 26th of October 2010: PBL and The Aalborg model 9.00 Welcome by lecturer Xiangyun Du and Lars Peter Jensen Introduction and presentation of lecturer and participants. Discussion of participants expectations (reflection-for-action). Introduction to the program. 10.00 Reflection on University teaching and learning, including learning theories and the need for educational change and innovation 11.00 PBL history, understanding, philosophy and practice from a global perspective 12.00 Lunch 13.00 AAU PBL model – history and evidence 13.30 PBL as educational model and Practice at Aalborg University 16.00 End of day one

3 Wednesday, the 27th of October 2010: Facilitation 9.00 Mini project: In a Danish brewery there is too much noise emitted in the production hall, due to the bottles. Plan how to find the noise sources and find solutions. 9.45 Introduction to role play. Exercise: Role play of a supervising situation 12.00 Lunch 13.00 Facilitation skills and experience exchange 14.30 Intercultural Communication in a PBL Environment 15.15 Forming Peer groups and planning experiment 16.00 End of day two

4 Wednesday, the 1th of December: Results from experiments with facilitation situations + Examination Until the last day of the course the participants are helping each other/sharing experience in Peer Groups making an experiment with supervision. 9.00 Presentation and discussion of group excercises. 12.00 Lunch 13.00 Assessment/Examinations of projects: Why and How 15.00 Unanswered questions and evaluation of the course.

5 PBL Aalborg Practice Three main characteristics Problem Project Team work

6 PBL Aalborg Model : Principles of Project-organized problem-solving Learning ‘The Aalborg Experiment – project innovation in university education’ - Kjaersdam & Enemark (1994)

7 Problems – question – wondering within a frame a project each semester (1. year) each group has a group room group size of 6-8 students first year, 2-3 students the last year each group has at least one supervisor self selected group and projects within themes and disciplines group examination Lectures 8:15-10:00 Lecture-related Assignment 10:15-12:00 Supervision -initiated & arranged by students Doing project In groups PBL Aalborg Model - practice

8 Method Semester Collaboration method/ Method of project work/learning Discipline learning Metods used in industry and institutions Scientific method 1 - 2 3 - 6 7 - 8 9 - 10 Development of different Competences through the study

9 Team work What ? A group of students working together on a project They have to both carry out the project and document the results Based on the documentation an oral individual examination is held. Before the examination the group presents the project

10 Team work Why ? A survey in 1997 showed that 75% of the companies wanted new employees to have good skills in team work Most engineers work in teams The individual student in the group learns from the others (peer learning) Responsibility towards the group leads to very hard work Group members provide social support, thus lower drop-out rate

11 Team work How ? Each group has a group room Group size of 6-8 students first year, 2-3 students last year Students are in charge of forming groups New groups formed every semester Team building courses: –Roles, communication, co-operation, conflicts

12 Group meeting Subgroup work Discussion Disagreement Presentation Compromise Exam Report writing Life Social activities Studying engineering via group projects Brainstorm Multiple learning resources Participating communities of practice – active learning, communication, organization, and management

13 Projects What ? A unique task Have a lot of complex activities Needs several people with different skills Have a final goal/objective Limited resources (time, money, people) Have to deliver a result at a given time: –As a minimum a written report

14 Projects Why ? More and more companies use project organization Much engineering work is performed as projects Motivates the students and increases student activity Secures deep learning in subjects covered in the project Improves documentation skills

15 Projects How ? One project each semester Necessary theories and methods given in (project) courses

16 Project – min. 15 ECTS Project courses lectures seminar min. 7,5 ECTS Study courses and Lectures – max. 7,5 ECTS Examination 33%- 50% 50% - 67% PBL AALBORG MODEL

17 The New Aalborg Model 17 50% courses 50% project Course 5 ECTS Project 15 ECTS In groups up to 8 persons Individual assessment Self-selected groups Appointed supervisor(s) One semester 1 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) = 30 working hours Course 5 ECTS Course 5 ECTS

18 Non project supporting courses 25 % Support to student learning – courses and project Teaching of basic knowledge. Not specifically related to the project. Taught as traditional courses or by other techniques. Traditional examination. Written or oral. Individual examination. Written or oral.

19 Project supporting courses 25 % Support to student learning – courses and project Courses which specifically support the project. e.g. economics, environment, planning, sociological methods, specific technical issues, group behavior, and group psychology, working environment, etc. Can be traditional courses, case studies, etc. Examination held as part of the project.

20 Semester timing – an example Mm. 1Free study activity Mm. 2SE-course 1SE-course 2Project work Mm. 3 Mm. 4PE-course 1 Mm. 5PE-course 4 Mm. 6PE-course 2Project work Mm. 7 Mm. 8PE-course 3 Mm. 9Project work Mm. 10 10 minimodules/week – 1 mm = 4 hours or ½ day 5 uger

21 Projects How ? One project each semester Necessary theories and methods given in project courses Each group has (at least) one supervisor Documentation: –a written report, oral defence, (construction) Courses in: –project management and planning

22 The four phase model of a Project Analysis Design Implementation Test Industriel Project Student Project too broad Student Project too narrow The ideal Student Project

23 What is analysis? Get an overview of the problem Asking Questions See Perspectives Divide into different aspects Top Down Bottum Up Look critically at all aspects Estimate Measure Compare

24 How to start analysing – presentation of two tools The six W- model Post It Brain storm 1.Everybody writes keywords on Post It notes for 5 min 2.All notes are placed on the blackboard 3.All notes are read out 4.Everybody goes to the blackboard and structures the notes together Problem Whom? Why? What? Where? When?How?

25 Problems What ? Three different types of problem based projects at AAU: Assignment projects (AP) –planning and control by the teachers/supervisors –problem and the subject chosen beforehand Subject projects (SP) –definition of the subject by the teachers beforehand. –students choose a problem and method. Problem projects (PP) –problem determines the choice of disciplines and methods.

26 The assignment project Considerable planning and control by the supervisors The problem and the subject as well as the methods are chosen beforehand The educational objectives are easily controlled Being a supervisor is easy in that the supervisor knows exactly what is going to be explored in the project and can direct the students' choices in the planned direction.

27 The assignment project Problem Discipline

28 The subject project The disciplines and the methods are chosen in advance The students have to identify and define a problem within the described disciplines The educational objectives are mostly formulated for each discipline Being a supervisor in this process may be a bit uncertain, because the students are allowed to make some choices on their own. However, the scientific field is described well and hardly any surprises occur

29 The subject project Discipline Problem

30 The problem project Based on problems as the starting point The problem will determine the choice of disciplines, theories and methods The educational objectives emphasises ability to analyse and methodological skills The problem has to be chosen within a broader social and technical frame Being a supervisor in this process may be difficult because it is a self-directed learning process and the supervisor may find him/herself at the edge of capacity

31 The problem project Problem Discipline

32 Common features of project work For all three types of projects, a problem has to be analysed and solved by means of different theories and methods The phases of the project are common to all three project types

33 Problems Why ? Real world problems are interdisciplinary and complex It is a learner-centred process It meets the learners' interests and enhances motivation It emphasizes development of analytical, methodological and transferable skills

34 AAU students on problems ”We are engineers – our responsibility is to solve real technological problems.” ”This is the first time we found a real problem ourselves rather than getting something from supervisors. It is really exciting. It fits my way of learning. I learn better when I find the way myself. This way of learning is much better than only attending lectures, because I have to know why I need to learn this. When I know the objective clearly, I learn much better.” ”When working on a problem, I am strongly motivated and attracted. We need to solve this problem.” Xiangyun Du, 2005

35 Problems How ? The project groups choose their own problem to work with in the projects The problem has to be analyzed within a relevant context before it can be solved or analyzed further The problem determines the choice of methods and theories to be used

36 PBL as educational model - practice at AAU students’ experiences Multiple learning resources Drawing upon multiple learning resources, students take active role creating learning opportunities and managing their own learning

37 We are engineers, our tasks are to solve problems (Male EE) Students’ perceptions We want to make it possible that we can learn from each other and everybody can learn what they want to learn This makes our study serious… like real work place (Male EE) We develop social skills in group work, this improves the learning process We get mental support from each other, it involves lots of responsibility so that we don’t easily drop out (Female A&D) We develop ourselves and get mature along the way I understand things better through explaining, discussing and practicing We feel easier to learn the technical skills through group work I am confident in different tasks now after these experiences… I am strongly motivated when working on problems We learn best when the knowledge can be related to the assignment and our project Project work help me get some ideas of what I am going to learn… PBL as educational model - practice at AAU students’ reflection


Download ppt "1 Problem based Learning in Engineering and Science – Development of Facilitator A Course given by: Xiangyun Du Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google