Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Update on Roughening Work Jake Blanchard HAPL MWG Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin e-meeting – July 2003.

Published byChristopher Spencer Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Update on Roughening Work Jake Blanchard HAPL MWG Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin e-meeting – July 2003."— Presentation transcript:

1 Update on Roughening Work Jake Blanchard HAPL MWG Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin e-meeting – July 2003

2 Agenda Update on Experiment Comparison Thoughts on Measuring Mass Loss Latest Temperature Predictions Initial Fracture Results Progress on Paper

3 Experiment Comparison Table ExperimentTypeEnergy (keV) Max Fluence per Pulse (J/cm 2 ) Approx Depth of Energy (microns) Max Starting Temperature (C) RHEPPIons75071-10600+ ZX-Rays0.8-1.230001-21000 XAPPERX-Rays0.1-0.471-2RT+ UCSDLaser0.701000 Electraelectrons5002100 Infrared q=10 MW/m 2 0 UW IECIons100Flux=5x10^ 19 /m 2 -s 1

4 Experiment Comparison Table ExperimentMax Sample Size (cm) Flat Top Pulse Width (ns) Rise Time (ns) Max Rep Rate (Hz) Max Number Cycles Sample Actively Cooled? RHEPP100NO Z6 XAPPER2.5 diameter 30-50 (FWHM ) 101e6NO UCSD1 cm x 1 cm 8103e5NO Electra30 cm x 100 cm 10040510k/dYES Infrared>10 msYES UW IECNO

5 Data to Be Collected in Surface Exposure Experiments BASICS –Name of Facility –Name of Experimentalist DEPOSITION –Energy Deposition type –Energy Spectrum –Deposition Profile –Fluence per Cycle –Number of Cycles –Pulse Width and Rise Time TARGET –Initial Target Temperature –Target Dimensions –Is the target cooled? How? –Target Material(s) –Material Identifier (Code) –Surface Cleaning Process RESULTS –Surface Evaluation Before and After –Mass Loss –Temperature History

6 How to Measure Mass Loss Weigh Samples before and After Measure Remaining Thickness of Armor (Profilometry, Auger, RBS) Measure What Comes Off (Spectrometry/RGA)

7 Latest Temperature Predictions Chamber radius (m) Xe Pressure (mTorr) Target Yield (MJ) W Thickness (microns) Peak W temperature in 10 cycles (C) Peak Steel Temperature in 10 cycles (C) Steel Temperature Swing (C) 8.510400503280820350 8.50154501820600170 8.510154501440570140 8.50154100182052090 8.510154100144050070 7.50154502320660230 7.510154501870620180 7.520154501530590160 7.501541002320550120 7.5101541001860530100 6.50154503100730290 6.510154502540690240 6.520154502070660210 6.501541003100600160 6.5101541002530580140 5.510154503660800330 Tcoolant=400 C, h=10,000 W/m2K, steel thickness=3 mm

8 Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Tungsten Coating Crack tip Crack depth Tungsten Steel Contact surface Crack tip stress intensities during thermal cycling calculated using ANSYS J-integral fracture mechanics algorithm

9 Thermal Response of Structure Temperature Contours Near Surface at end of Pulse 6.5 m chamber 154 MJ target No gas 50 microns W

10 Stresses Resulting from Thermal Cycle Stresses at Maximum TemperatureStresses After Cool Down MPa

11 Transient Stress Intensity (30  m Crack Depth) Fracture Mechanics Analysis Results Maximum stress intensities occur at end of cycle (when structure is cool). Stress intensity decreases with increasing crack depth Stress Intensity vs. Crack Depth After One Thermal Cycle

12 Next Steps What is effect of crack spacing? What if crack reaches steel?

13 Paper Outline – My Chapter 3 Armor (Blanchard) –3.1 Prompt threats: Expt and modeling of the response of armor candidates 3.1.1 ablation; (Expts: Olson, Rank, Tanaka, Latkowski, Najmabadi. Modeling: Wisc) 3.1.2 roughening (Expts: Olson, Rank, Tanaka, Latkowski, Najmabadi. Modeling: Ghoneim, Blanchard) 3.1.3 sputtering (Expts ? Modeling: Lucas?) 3.1.4 Do we gain anything with EW? (Ghoneim, Raffray) –3.2 Long term threats: Expt and modeling of the response of armor candidates 3.2.1 He retention ( EW: Ghoneim, Solid wall: Snead, Expts: Kulcinski) 3.2.2 Modeling: thermo-mechanical fatigue long term effects (Blanchard,. ) 3.2.3 Expts: thermo-mechanical fatigue long term effects (Latkowski, Najmabadi, Raffray, Ghoneim, (SNL?))

Download ppt "Update on Roughening Work Jake Blanchard HAPL MWG Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin e-meeting – July 2003."

Similar presentations

M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. L. Sequoia Grazing-Incidence Metal Mirrors for Laser-IFE Third IAEA Technical Meeting on “Physics and Technology of Inertial.

M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. L. Sequoia Grazing-Incidence Metal Mirrors for Laser-IFE Third IAEA Technical Meeting on “Physics and Technology of Inertial.
September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.

September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.
Government Labs 1.NRL 2.LLNL 3.SNL 4.LANL 5.ORNL 6.PPPL Universities 1.UCSD 2.Wisconsin 3.Georgia Tech 4.UCLA 5.U Rochester 6.PPPL 7.UC Santa Barbara 8.UNC.

Government Labs 1.NRL 2.LLNL 3.SNL 4.LANL 5.ORNL 6.PPPL Universities 1.UCSD 2.Wisconsin 3.Georgia Tech 4.UCLA 5.U Rochester 6.PPPL 7.UC Santa Barbara 8.UNC.
Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.

Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.

Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,

April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,
Threats to the GIMM and Use of XAPPER for Testing Jeff Latkowski Ryan Abbott February 15, 2006.

Threats to the GIMM and Use of XAPPER for Testing Jeff Latkowski Ryan Abbott February 15, 2006.
May 31-June 1, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Assessment of Dry Chamber Walls as Preliminary Step in Defining Key Processes for Chamber Clearing Code 1 Assessment.

May 31-June 1, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Assessment of Dry Chamber Walls as Preliminary Step in Defining Key Processes for Chamber Clearing Code 1 Assessment.
April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 1 Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet.

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 1 Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet.
April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,
April 10, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE 1 Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE A. R. Raffray 1, G.

April 10, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE 1 Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE A. R. Raffray 1, G.
June7-8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Completion of Assessment of Dry Chamber Wall Option Without Protective Gas, and Initial Planning Activity for Assessment.

June7-8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Completion of Assessment of Dry Chamber Wall Option Without Protective Gas, and Initial Planning Activity for Assessment.
November 8-9, 2005 1 Considerations for Small Chambers A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from M. Sawan (UW), I. Sviatoslavsky (UW) and X. Wang (UCSD)

November 8-9, Considerations for Small Chambers A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from M. Sawan (UW), I. Sviatoslavsky (UW) and X. Wang (UCSD)
October 24, 2001 1 1. Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.

October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.

Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.
HAPL May 22-27, 2005 ISFNT-7, Tokyo, Japan 1 Progress Towards Realization of a Laser IFE Solid Wall Chamber A.R. Raffray 1, J. Blanchard 2, J. Latkowski.

HAPL May 22-27, 2005 ISFNT-7, Tokyo, Japan 1 Progress Towards Realization of a Laser IFE Solid Wall Chamber A.R. Raffray 1, J. Blanchard 2, J. Latkowski.
August 30, 2001 A. R. Raffray, IFE Dry Chamber Wall Designs 1 IFE Dry Chamber Wall Designs A. R. Raffray and F. Najmabadi University of California, San.

August 30, 2001 A. R. Raffray, IFE Dry Chamber Wall Designs 1 IFE Dry Chamber Wall Designs A. R. Raffray and F. Najmabadi University of California, San.
Fracture of Divertor Structures Jake Blanchard ARIES Meeting April 2011.

Fracture of Divertor Structures Jake Blanchard ARIES Meeting April 2011.
April 9-10, 2003 HAPL Program Meeting, SNL, Albuquerque, N.M. 1 Lowering Target Initial Temperature to Enhance Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray.

April 9-10, 2003 HAPL Program Meeting, SNL, Albuquerque, N.M. 1 Lowering Target Initial Temperature to Enhance Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray.
Unsteady Heat Transfer in Semi-infinite Solids Solidification process of the coating layer during a thermal spray operation is an unsteady heat transfer.

Unsteady Heat Transfer in Semi-infinite Solids Solidification process of the coating layer during a thermal spray operation is an unsteady heat transfer.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google