Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EuroCODE ~ Complete Object Denotation Environment EuroCODE ~ Complete Object Denotation Environment A Component-based Semantic Knowledge Platform Erfahrungen.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EuroCODE ~ Complete Object Denotation Environment EuroCODE ~ Complete Object Denotation Environment A Component-based Semantic Knowledge Platform Erfahrungen."— Presentation transcript:

1 EuroCODE ~ Complete Object Denotation Environment EuroCODE ~ Complete Object Denotation Environment A Component-based Semantic Knowledge Platform Erfahrungen mit einem EU-Proposal aus dem MultiMedia Lab A Component-based Semantic Knowledge Platform Erfahrungen mit einem EU-Proposal aus dem MultiMedia Lab Guerino Mazzola

2 Autumn 2002 The Topos of Music Geometric Logic of Concepts, Theory, and Performance In collaboration with Stefan Göller and Stefan Müller Contributions by Carlos Agon, Moreno Andreatta, Gérard Assayag, Jan Beran, Chantal Buteau, Roberto Ferretti, Anja Fleischer, Harald Fripertinger, Jörg Garbers,Werner Hemmert, Michael Leyton, Emilio Lluis Puebla, Mariana Montiel Hernandez, Thomas Noll, Joachim Stange-Elbe, Hans Straub, Oliver Zahorka 1368pp/CD-ROM ISBN ToM

3 ... to survive! Apply! in order to survive

4 Project Category -> Priority 2 = IST = Information Society Technologies 1 st Call (Dec.2002) Activity code = IST ~ 1 st Call (Dec.2002) Activity code = IST ~ Semantic-based knowledge systems multimedia content mining, distributed computing platforms, mastery of complex information spaces, visualisation of high-dimensional objects, new formal models, covering foundational component-level as well as system-level research Semantic-based knowledge systems multimedia content mining, distributed computing platforms, mastery of complex information spaces, visualisation of high-dimensional objects, new formal models, covering foundational component-level as well as system-level research -> Instrument = STREP = Special Targeted REsearch and innovation Project (new results/knowledge -> develop products) Special Targeted REsearch and innovation Project (new results/knowledge -> develop products) -> STREP Activity = RTD + innovation-related + project management activities + demonstration activities 6th Framework Program EU 6th FP Instrument = STRIP = Special Targeted Research and Innovation Project

5 1.Knowledge is ordered access to information 3 principles

6 2.Knowledge is controlled by multimedia objects 3 principles

7 3. The body of knowledge evolves in a cyclic process 3 principles Production Dissemination Documentation Reflection

8 presto presto ® 1:26 presto

9 Os X RUBATO ® RUBATO

10 GeneralNoteGeneralNote – – OnsetOnsetLoudnessLoudnessDurationDurationPitchPitch NoteNote STRG Ÿ– – DurationDuration OnsetOnset PausePause concept modeling

11 MakroNoteMakroNote MakroNoteMakroNote SatellitesSatellites Ornaments Ornaments Schenker Analysis Schenker Analysis GeneralNoteGeneralNote – – OnsetOnsetLoudnessLoudnessDurationDurationPitchPitch NoteNote STRG Ÿ – – DurationDurationOnsetOnset PausePause concept modeling

12 E form semiotics E Mono( E ) R Den Forms DenE Diagrams ( Den / E ) Coordinate Identifier D-Name F-Name Form Type Diagram Types

13 FrameSpace for type: R Simple = R simple() =R simple( ) = R representationrepresentation E Limit = form-name diagram E limit() = lim(f. diagram E ) limit( ) = lim(f. diagram E ) conjunctionconjunction E Colimit = form-name diagram E colimit() = colim(f. diagram E ) colimit( ) = colim(f. diagram E ) disjunctiondisjunction E Power = fn E power() = Space(fn) power( ) = Space(fn) collectioncollection frame spaces

14 Babouska ExpressionSignificationContent Meta system ExpressionSignificationContent ExpressionSignificationContent Motivation ExpressionSignificationContent Connotation Hjelmslevs Babouska Principle

15 NameType/DiagramIdentifier NameFormCoordinate Denotator Topos form semiotics The semiotic structure (Hjelmslev stratification) of denotators: The triadic sign structure (signifier/signification/signified) reads from left to right

16 patent MakroNoteMakroNote MakroNoteMakroNote SatellitesSatellites GeneralNoteGeneralNote – – OnsetOnsetLoudnessLoudnessDurationDurationPitchPitch NoteNote STRG Ÿ – – DurationDurationOnsetOnset PausePause Render Denote

17 multimedia science VECTORS CONCEPTS fold conceive parametrize denote objectivize render manipulate operate transform

18 VECTORS CONCEPTS fold objectivize render

19 VECTORS CONCEPTS fold

20 folding

21 lexicographic ordering x x = (x 1,x 2,x 3,...,x n ) n-cube quantize: x i = 0,1,2,3,...,d real axisx* common ordering x* = 0.x 1 x 2 x 3...x n folding

22 multimedia science VECTORS objectivize

23 pinocchio

24 books

25 movie Movie of Stefan Göllers PrimavistaBrowser 500 Pinocchios AnimatesWorkflow

26 satellites SatSat SatlistSatlistGeoGeo TimeTime 2 *4 *4 SoundSound TimeTime 2 *3 *3 ScaleScale TimeTime 2 TransTrans TimeTime 2 RotRot TimeTime 2 * TexTex TimeTime 2 ColorColor ETCETC Terminator RTCRTC URL SatlistSatlistSatSat

27 manipulate manipulate objects

28 cockpit - espresso

29

30

31 The EuroCODE Architecture Framework: Denotator, Form, Topoi (Ring, Module, etc.) Diagram,... Framework: Denotator, Form, Topoi (Ring, Module, etc.) Diagram,... LoGeo class library: Logical and geometric operations for predicate construction and manipulationsearch algorithms LoGeo class library: Logical and geometric operations for predicate construction and manipulationsearch algorithms Prima- Vista- Browser Info- Codette Mandatory Codette- Factory Challenging Cockpit- Factory Tools XML 2 CODE Mus-e- Lear- ning AMO- Codette Data- Scape Etc. Cockpit 1 Cockpit 2

32 Challenging Components Generic tools The EuroCODE R&D Strategy = RED&T LoGeo Codette- Factory Cockpit- Factory = PredicateBuilder (Processes) = StructureBuilder (Architecture) = InterfaceBuilder (Interaction) Data- Scape XML 2 CODE AMO Codette Mus-e- Lear- ning Etc. Extend Test Deliver Request red&t

33 workpackages 11 partners: 5Universities and research centers 1 foundation 1 big company 4 SMEs 15 WP, 122 DEL 3 years, 5.8 M ~ 926 MM 0.3 M management management-oriented packages WORK 1 (project management) WORK 1 (project management) WORK 2 (communication management) WORK 2 (communication management) WORK 3 (scientific coordination) WORK 3 (scientific coordination) WORK 15 (transfer management) WORK 15 (transfer management) generic workpackages generic workpackages WORK 4 (Framework) WORK 4 (Framework) WORK 5 (PredicateBuilder) WORK 5 (PredicateBuilder) WORK 6 (PrimavistaBrowser) WORK 6 (PrimavistaBrowser) WORK 7 (CodetteFactory) WORK 7 (CodetteFactory) WORK 8 (CockpitFactory) WORK 8 (CockpitFactory) challenging component targeted packages WORK 9 (XML2CODE) WORK 9 (XML2CODE) WORK 10 (AMOCodette) WORK 10 (AMOCodette) WORK 11 (DataScape) WORK 11 (DataScape) WORK 12 (TerrainDataView) WORK 12 (TerrainDataView) WORK 13 (KnowledgeGate) WORK 13 (KnowledgeGate) WORK 14 (Mus-e-Learning) WORK 14 (Mus-e-Learning)

34 Project Manager General Public EU Commission Steering Board (with representa- tives from each partner) AdministrationComunication Scientific Coordination Transfer Management management WORK 1 WORK 2 WORK 3 WORK 15

35 Statistik zur 1. IST-Ausschreibung Die erste IST-Ausschreibung im 6. Forschungsrahmenprogramm endete am 24. April Insgesamt sind 1473 Projektanträge eingereicht worden Insgesamt sind 1473 Projektanträge eingereicht worden, und zwar 77,6% als Papierversion und 22,4% per elektronischer Einreichung. Ein erster statistischer Überblick über die Anzahl der eingereichten Projektanträge - aufgeschlüsselt nach den einzelnen strategischen Zielen aus dem IST-Arbeitsprogramm und mit Verteilung auf die einzelnen Instrumente (IP, NoE, STREP und andere: CA, SSA): Wissenssysteme: 129 gesamt (, 80 STREPs, ) CMOS und Post-CMOS: 53 gesamt (11 IPs, 8 NoEs, 29 STREPs, 5 andere) Mikro-, Nanosysteme: 82 gesamt (25 IPs, 14 NoEs, 36 STREPs, 7 andere) Breitband für alle: 80 gesamt (12 IPs, 8 NoEs, 45 STREPs, 15 andere) Mobile drahtlose Systeme: 92 gesamt (15 IPs, 15 NoEs, 50 STREPs, 12 andere) Zuverlässigkeit, Sicherheit: 93 gesamt (23 IPs, 8 NoEs, 55 STREPs, 7 andere) Multimodale Schnittstellen: 74 gesamt (23 IPs, 10 NoEs, 36 STREPs, 5 andere) Wissenssysteme: 129 gesamt (18 IPs, 21 NoEs, 80 STREPs, 10 andere) audiov. Syst., Heimplattformen: 78 gesamt (18 IPs, 7 NoEs, 48 STREPs, 5 andere) eBusiness, eGovernment: 248 gesamt (59 IPs, 19 NoEs, 116 STREPs, 54 andere) eSafety: 53 gesamt (11 IPs, 3 NoEs, 35 STREPs, 4 andere) eHealth: 170 gesamt (47 IPs, 20 NoEs, 89 STREPs, 14 andere) eLearning, Kultur: 217 gesamt (54 IPs, 27 NoEs, 115 STREPs, 21 andere) FET vorausschauend: 30 gesamt (25 IPs, 4 NoEs, 1 STREP) Begleitmaßnahmen: 35 gesamt (4 CAs, 31 SSAs) budgetmäßige Überzeichnung liegt zwischen 5:1 und 20:1 Summe: 1473 gesamt (348 IPs, 169 NoEs, 755 STREPs, 58 CAs, 138 SSAs, 5?) Die budgetmäßige Überzeichnung (Verhältnis von beantragtem Budget zu verfügbarem Budget) variiert in den einzelnen strategischen Zielen und liegt zwischen 5:1 und 20:1. Gemeinsame Ausschreibung mit Priorität Produkte und Dienste 2010: 92 gesamt (52 IPs, 18 NoEs, 9 CAs, 13 SSAs) Weiterer Zeitplan für die 1. IST-Ausschreibung: Die Europäische Kommission hat folgenden Zeitplan für die erste IST-Ausschreibung vorgelegt: 12. bis 23. Mai 2003: Begutachtung der Projektanträge 2. bis 13. Juni 2003: Anhörungen (hearings) zu den erfolgreichen (über Schwellwerten liegend) IPs und NoEs 26. Kalenderwoche (=nächste Woche): Projektkoordinator erhält Bewertungsbericht 26. Kalenderwoche (=nächste Woche): Projektkoordinator erhält Bewertungsbericht (Evaluation Summary Report) und Begutachtungsbericht geht an das IST Committee. Ab diesem Zeitpunkt können wir Ihnen nähere Auskünfte zu Ihren Projektanträgen geben (Anfragen bitte per an mit Angaben zu Antrags-Nr., Akronym, angesprochener IST Bereich 'strategic objective', Name des Antragstellers) Juli 2003: Bilaterale Gespräche zwischen Vertretern der Mitgliedstaaten (IST Committee) und Europäischer Kommission 25. Juli 2003: Endgültige Liste der geförderten Projekte (implementation plan) statistics

36 Schedule I 15 MarchConsortium Meeting15 MarchConsortium Meeting 17 MarchRequest for login and password of coordinator; necessary for all electronic proposal submission acti- vities17 MarchRequest for login and password of coordinator; necessary for all electronic proposal submission acti- vities 18 MarchPre-registration (electronic) Need: Acronym, title, abstract, consortium members, some obvious code and key words18 MarchPre-registration (electronic) Need: Acronym, title, abstract, consortium members, some obvious code and key words MarchTravel Mazzola to IRCAM for negotiations21-23 MarchTravel Mazzola to IRCAM for negotiations End of MarchFirst Draft of proposal; submission to EU site: visibility for all consortium partnersEnd of MarchFirst Draft of proposal; submission to EU site: visibility for all consortium partners AprilTravel to Bonn and Osnabrück14-17 AprilTravel to Bonn and Osnabrück

37 Schedule II 14 April Revised Draft; check with national contact point for formal correctness14 April Revised Draft; check with national contact point for formal correctness 15 AprilFinal (electronic) submission of proposal15 AprilFinal (electronic) submission of proposal 24 April, 17:00End of submission period24 April, 17:00End of submission period 8 MayAcknowlegment of receipt8 MayAcknowlegment of receipt JuneEvaluation reportJuneEvaluation report From JulyNegotiation meetings in BrusellesFrom JulyNegotiation meetings in Bruselles From OctoberApproval of fundingFrom OctoberApproval of funding

38 Evaluation Criteria II 4.Quality of consortium high qualityhigh quality committed and well-suited partnerscommitted and well-suited partners complementaritycomplementarity SMEs adequately addressedSMEs adequately addressed 5.Quality of management Project management of high qualityProject management of high quality Management of knowledge, intellectual property, and innovative activitiesManagement of knowledge, intellectual property, and innovative activities 6.Mobilisation of resources Resourses foreseenResourses foreseen Resources integrated -> coherenceResources integrated -> coherence Financial plan adequateFinancial plan adequate

39 Submission form Parts A & B Part A A1: Proposal Nr, acronym, title, duration, call identifier, activity codes, keyword codes, free keywords, abstract (max char.)A1: Proposal Nr, acronym, title, duration, call identifier, activity codes, keyword codes, free keywords, abstract (max char.) A2:Participant portraits (9): Name of organization, address person in charge, phone number, , internet homepageA2:Participant portraits (9): Name of organization, address person in charge, phone number, , internet homepage A3:Financial information: cost model of participants, costs, requested grant to budget, split among RTD, demonstration, management activitiesA3:Financial information: cost model of participants, costs, requested grant to budget, split among RTD, demonstration, management activities

40 Submission form Parts A & B Part B Front page: basic coordinates of proposal Contents page: contents list Proposal summary page B.1: Scientific and technological objectives of the project and state-of-the-art (3pp)B.1: Scientific and technological objectives of the project and state-of-the-art (3pp) B.2: relevance to the objectives of the IST Priority (3pp)B.2: relevance to the objectives of the IST Priority (3pp) B.3: Potential Impact (3pp)B.3: Potential Impact (3pp) B.3.1: Contributions to standardsB.3.1: Contributions to standards B.4: The consortium and project resources (6pp)B.4: The consortium and project resources (6pp) B.5: Project management (3pp)B.5: Project management (3pp) B.6: Workplan (15pp) >…B.6: Workplan (15pp) >… B.7: Other issues (ethical and gender issues, other EU issues)B.7: Other issues (ethical and gender issues, other EU issues)

41 Part B.6: Workplan a)Overview of plan methodology b)Gantt chart of timing of different WPs (=work packages) c)Pert (=Program Evaluation Review Technique) diagram of components d)Detailed work description broken down into WPs: 1.WP list (with: Nr., title, person months, start, end) 2.Deliverable list (with: Nr., title, date, nature, dissemination level: public, restricted, confidential) 3.Description of each WP (objectives, description, deliverables, milestones)

42 FMT U Osnabrück *** IRCAM Paris **** Kom&Alg U Bonn *** LIM U Milano **** MML U Zürich ***** fabric Lausanne *** finebrain Basel *** ViewTec Zürich *** IGD FhG CAPcom INI-GraphicsNet Foundation Darmstadt ** ^ Partner Task > Module Diagram Functor Denotator Form Satellite Folding LoGeo Retrieval Cockpit Data- scapes DBMSXML etc. integration Knowledge transfer Project Manage- ment

43 Provisional Workpackages IRCAM Paris (IR) m/m IR1.1programming issues16 IR1.2cognitive/logical models16 IR1.3algebraic models16 IR1.4integration of concepts10 IR1.5denotator import/export6 IR2.1authoring module10 IR2.2GUI module8 IR2.3sound tools10 FABRIC|CH Lausanne (FA) FA1project management3 FA2state-of-the-art5 FA3concepts + tech. choice framework development8 FA4tests of framework4 FA5application development8 FA6dissemination6 FA7results assessment & risk management1 FMT Osnabrück (FM) FM1project management36 FM2.1MusEducator concepts12 FM2.2MusEducator implementation12 FM2.3MusEducator product12 FM3.1KnowledgeGate concepts12 FM3.2KnowledgeGate implementation12 FM3.3KnowledgeGate product12 FM4.1XML2CODE design12 FM4.2XML2CODE implementation12 VIEWTEC Zürich (VT)m/m VT1.1satellites for GIS general concepts10 VT1.2satellites for GIS design18 VT2.1TerrainDataView implementation18 VT2.2TerrainDataView product18 K&A Bonn (KA) KA1algorithms for denotator search20 KA2DenoBMS concepts20 KA3implementation of KA120 KA4performance tests12 INI Darmstadt (IN) IN1transfer management18 LIM Milano (LM)m/m LM1.1XML2CODE Design12 LM1.2XML2CODE implementation12 LM2.1SPINE (Performance) concepts12 LM2.2SPINE implementation12 LM3.1Symbolic & Audio design12 LM3.2Symbolic & Audio12 implementation12 MML Zürich (MM) MM1PrimavistaBrowser & InfoCodette10 MM2denotator and topos framework10 MM3LoGeo library40 MM4CodetteFactory20 MM5CockpitFactory20 MM6scientific coordination36 FINEBRAIN Basel (FI) FI1requirement analysis24 FI2search space concepts24 FI3transfer to clients24

44 Framework (Foundation Classes) LoGeo (ProcessBuilder) LoGeo (ProcessBuilder) Prima- Vista- Browser Info- Codette Codette- Factory (Structure-Builder) Cockpit- Factory (Interface-Builder) XML 2 CODE AMOEngine Data- Scape Know- ledge- Gate &T&T Terrain Data View MusEdu -cator Time DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PRODUCT MM3 IR1.4 IR2.1 IR1.1 IR1.2 IR1.3 IR2.2 IR2.3 FM2.1 LM1.2 LM1.1 LM2.2 LM2.1 LM3.2 LM3.1 FM2.2 FM2.3 FM3.1 FM3.2 FM4.1 FM4.2 FA5 IN1 MM1 MM2 FA4 FA3 MM4MM5 VT2.1 VT1.1 VT1.2 VT2.2 FM1FA1FA7 MM6 FA6 FA2 KA3 KA2 KA1 KA4 FI2 FI3 FI1 FM3.3

45 XML 2 CODE AMOEngine Data- Scape Know- ledge- Gate Framework (Foundation Classes) LoGeo (ProcessBuilder) LoGeo (ProcessBuilder) Prima- Vista- Browser Info- Codette Codette- Factory (Structure-Builder) Cockpit- Factory (Interface-Builder) MusEdu- cator Time DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PRODUCT &T&T MM3 IR1.4 IR2.1 IR1.1 IR1.2 IR1.3 IR2.2 IR2.3 FM2.1 LM1.2 LM1.1 LM2.2 LM2.1 LM3.2 LM3.1 FM2.2 FM2.3 FM3.1 FM3.2 FM4.1 FM4.2 FA5 IN1 MM1 MM2 FA4 FA3 MM4MM5 VT2.1 VT1.1 VT1.2 VT2.2 FM1FA1FA7 MM6 FA6 FA2 KA3 KA2 KA1 KA4 FI2 FI3 FI1 FM3.3

46 Consortium Size 1.at least 3 independent legal entities (9+2) 2.In at least 3 different Member States or Associate States (D,F,I,CH) Scale of activities Up to several Mega- (?) from a total of Mega- for IST (55 Mega- for semantic-based knowledge systems, estimated 4-5 STREPs for 2-3 Mega- each) Costs are calculated from local rates per partner, no global presets! Essentially 2 cost models: FC = Full costs and AC = Additional costs AC = option for universities and research institutes (100% of add. costs) FC = option for SMEs (50% of full costs) Duration 2-3 years, or more if duly justified (3) Participants 1.Universities (4) 2.Research institutes (1+IGD) 3.SMEs (3+CAPcom AG) 4.Knowledge transfer organizations (1) 5.Potential users and stakeholders (0 +IGD +CAPcom AG)

47 Evaluation Criteria I 1.Relevance to the objective of the program ScientificScientific TechnicalTechnical Socio-economic (the EuroCODE platform is mandatory and essential for the construction of the kowledge society)Socio-economic (the EuroCODE platform is mandatory and essential for the construction of the kowledge society) Political (strategic fostering of open European systems & SW)Political (strategic fostering of open European systems & SW) Specified in the work packages (=WPs) 2.Scientific and technological excellence Defined and well-focused objectiveDefined and well-focused objective Clear progress beyond state-of-the-artClear progress beyond state-of-the-art Proposed S&T approach adequate to targetProposed S&T approach adequate to target 3.Potential impact Impact on reinforcing competitivenessImpact on reinforcing competitiveness Added value of European level (against national)Added value of European level (against national) Exploitation and dissemination ensure optimal use of resultsExploitation and dissemination ensure optimal use of results

48 Audio Studio Workstation Library at IRCAM Distributed Rubato MeloTop

49

50 document type definition (.dtd) xml document (.xml) stylesheet (.xsl) EuroCODE XML form denotator satellite (.dtx) chapter 1 - Intro chapter 2 - Conclusion Index Personal:.Limit[Leaders, Staff]; Leaders:.Power{ProjectPerson}; Staff:.Power{ProjectPerson}; Resources:.Limit[Budget, Financing, Hardware, Processes]; Budget:.Power{Document}; Financing:.Power{Document}; Hardware:.Power{Document}; Processes:.Power{Document}; xml

51 documents character data content model types ad hoc rendering via XSL object configurations topoi all categorical types universal recursive multi-media representation (PCT patent) EuroCODE XML vs. xml


Download ppt "EuroCODE ~ Complete Object Denotation Environment EuroCODE ~ Complete Object Denotation Environment A Component-based Semantic Knowledge Platform Erfahrungen."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google