Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ATLAS FP TRACKER PLANS Steve Watts School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Well defined design in the FP420 Design Report Based on the.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ATLAS FP TRACKER PLANS Steve Watts School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Well defined design in the FP420 Design Report Based on the."— Presentation transcript:

1 ATLAS FP TRACKER PLANS Steve Watts School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Well defined design in the FP420 Design Report Based on the FE-I3 ATLAS Pixel Readout chip. Design suitable for 220 but needs roughly double the number of sensors. Layout is more difficult and power dissipation is higher. Radiation level close to beam is very high. Implications for the readout chip. Sensor is good to 1-2 10 16 charged hadrons cm -2 300-600 MRad Consequence – New Design for the Tracker…… R&D is linked to 3D sensor developments for IBL and SLHC

2 220 m 420 m

3 FE-I3 Lifetime issue 10 15 charged particles per cm 2 or ~30 Mrad SOLUTION A 3D sensor safe to 1-2 10 16 charged hadrons per cm 2 Dose highest in very narrow vertical band. Move sensors up and down by 1-2 mm to even out the dose Trick used with CCDs in NA32. Additional specification for mechanical design. Would give a factor 3.

4 New FE-I4 –Pixel size = 250 x 50 µm 2 –Pixels = 80 x 336 –Technology = 0.13µm –Power = 0.5 W/cm 2 FE-I4 Design Status –Contribution from 5 laboratories. –Main blocks MPW submitted in Spring 2008. –Full FE-I4 Review: 2/3/3009 –Submission in Summer 2009 –Expect IBL modules late 2010 7.6mm 8mmactive 2.8mm FE-I3 74% 20.2mm active 16.8mm ~2mm ~200 μ m FE-I4 ~89% Chartered reticule (24 x 32) IBM reticule ~19 mm FE-I3 - lifetime issue Solution B Use FE-I4. Factor 5 more radiation tolerant than FE-I3. For IBL project Plus - better matched to track hit distribution at 220. - Common module design for 220 and 420 - 2 x Fe-I4 each plane

5

6

7 NOTE: IMPROVED Y-Measurement. Consequence for physics ??? NOTE2: Assumes hits distribution stable with time…..

8 FE-I3 versus FE-I4 FE-I3 run had very poor yield. There will be another run in 2010. FE-I4 First run will produce chips in summer/Autumn 2010 ASIC designs always take more than one iteration. FE-I4 3D sensor is larger and thus yields will be lower. Conclusion FE-I4 baseline. There will be 3D/FE-I4 detectors developed for IBL. Mechanics/electronics engineers to look at FE-I4 design. FE-I4 - common 220/420 mechanics design


Download ppt "ATLAS FP TRACKER PLANS Steve Watts School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Well defined design in the FP420 Design Report Based on the."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google