Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23, 2007

2 Purpose for Revision More clearly defines monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements Establishes new criteria by which a source may be determined to be exempt Clearly defines when initial and additional compliance tests should be performed

3 Applicability Sulfuric acid plants Sulfur recovery plants Each single point source that emits or has the potential to emit ≥ 5 tons per year of SO 2 – SO 2 emissions < 5 tons per year → LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 does not apply

4 If the source is subject to Chapter 15, what limitations apply? For sources other than sulfuric acid plants and sulfur recovery plants – SO 2 emissions ≤ 2,000 parts per million by volume (ppmv) – If SO 2 emissions < 250 tons per year, LDEQ may exempt source from 2,000 ppmv limit This provision exists in both the current and the proposed regulation.

5 When must a Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) be installed? Per §1511.A of the proposed rule, CEMS is required if “ … subject to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations of this Chapter …”. – Current rule says “… subject to the provisions of this Chapter …”. – Source can apply for alternative to CEMS

6 When must a CEMS not be installed? Per §1511.D of the proposed rule, LDEQ shall not require CEMS for – Flares – Sources with potential to emit of < 100 tons per year – Sources identified in 40 CFR 51, App. P – Sources subject to 40 CFR 75 First three items are present in current rule

7 If the SO2 emission limitation doesn’t apply, what is required to show compliance? Per §1513.C of the proposed rule, source not subject to emission limitations shall: – “…record and retain at the site sufficient data to show annual potential sulfur dioxide emissions from the emissions unit.” – That’s it. Per §1513.A of the current and proposed rule, this data shall be recorded and retained at the site for at least two (2) years.

8 Summary LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 does not apply to sources at sugar mills that emit or have the potential to emit < 5 tons per year [LAC 33:III.1502.A.3] Sources at sugar mills that emit ≥ 5 tons per year but < 250 tons per year may be exempted from 2,000 ppmv limit. Sources at sugar mills that are exempted from 2,000 ppmv limit must maintain calculations to show potential annual SO 2 emissions.

9 Summary (cont.) Sources at sugar mills that are not exempted from the 2,000 ppmv and emit greater than 100 tons per year of SO 2 require an SO 2 CEMS or must apply for alternative compliance. – Due to the characteristically low levels of sulfur associated with natural gas and bagasse, a source with this level of emissions is extremely unlikely. The pending revisions to LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 do not impact in any way the sources which require an SO 2 CEMS.


Download ppt "Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google