Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Homework 2 (due We, Feb. 1): Reading: Van Holde, Chapter 1 Van Holde Chapter 3.1 to 3.3 Van Holde Chapter 2 (we’ll go through Chapters 1 and 3 first. 1.Van.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Homework 2 (due We, Feb. 1): Reading: Van Holde, Chapter 1 Van Holde Chapter 3.1 to 3.3 Van Holde Chapter 2 (we’ll go through Chapters 1 and 3 first. 1.Van."— Presentation transcript:

1 Homework 2 (due We, Feb. 1): Reading: Van Holde, Chapter 1 Van Holde Chapter 3.1 to 3.3 Van Holde Chapter 2 (we’ll go through Chapters 1 and 3 first. 1.Van Holde 3.1(Coulomb potential) 2.Van Holde 3.2(Dipole-diople interaction) 3.Van Holde 3.3(Lennard-Jones potential) 4.Van Holde 3.4(force is gradient of potential) 5.Van Holde 3.6(Manning theory of counterion condensation) 6.Van Holde 3.9(Hydrogen-bond potential) Paper list (for presentations) is posted on web site Introduction-2 Important molecular interactions in Biomolecules

2

3 The notion of potential energy The force, with which molecules attract or repel each other is: Force is negative of (gradient) slope of potential well  Molecules get “pushed” to the lowest point of potential  Molecules sit in minimum of potential function V x Molecular potentials: (We are ignoring entropy for the time being (  Gibbs free energy)

4 Bonding potential (covalent bonds) V bonding is big, but  V bonding between conformations is not so big  V nonbonding is what counts most for folding. The bond potentials are often approximated by harmonic potentials (good for small deflection): (200- 800 kJ/mole)

5 Charge-charge interaction A lot of biological molecules are charged. Amino acids: Asp -, Glu -, Lys + Arg +, His + ; DNA: phosphates - in backbone, salt ions, etc. Like charges repel, opposite charges attract. Z 1,2 … amount of charge e … charge of electron e = 1.6*10 -19 C r … separation of charges D … Dielectric constant; D =  r  0  0 … permittivity constant  0 = 8.85*10 -12 C 2 /Nm 2  …4  in SI units  r … relative permittivity (depends on material) The tricky part 1: D not constant) D water = 78.5·  0 (easy). D inside a protein varies (1·  0 to 20·  0, average ~3.5  0 ) and depends on the local environment Various approx. to deal with this Tricky part 2: (counterion screening) Really also related to D not being constant) Counterions (salt) condense/surround fixed charges on protein/DNA (~ 60 kJ/mole, long-range)

6 Counterion shielding (screening) N fixed charges in vacuum have the following potential: The ions in solution are then forming a “cloud” around those charges, which effectively screens the fixed charges from each other: Debye-Hückel screening parameter  : (“decay length of charge strength) D … dielectric constant k B … Boltzmann constant T … absolute temperature I … ionic strength; e … electron charge N A … Avogadro’s number c … ion concentration Z… valency Solution ions form a “cloud’ around the fixed charges on protein surfaces or DNA.  The electric potential of these fixed charges is weakened (damped). This damping is called Screening.

7 Counterion condensation (Manning theory) How large is the net charge of the phosphates then? Amount of charge neutralized: Thus, for B-DNA, 76% is compensated in aqueous Na+ environment and 24% is not compensated. Charges also condense (bind longer) onto fixed protein/DNA charges, and partly neutralize them. This effect does not depend on ion concentration (like screening). For condensation of counterions onto DNA: If a charge is actually “condensed”, depends on the parameter  For  > 1, condensation occurs. For an electrolyte in water,  = 0.71/b, with b in nm. At 25°C,  = 4.2 for B DNA.  So, counterions do condense on DNA. b … distance between charges. For DNA: b = h/Z = 0.34/2 = 0.17

8 Dipole-dipole Interactions Dipole moment (note: vectors) +- General dipole-dipole interaction: If  1 and  2 are side by side: If  1 and  2 are parallel: (~ -2 to 2 kJ/mole, shorter range, can act in series)

9 Induced dipole-induced dipole interactions (van der Waals interactions) Attractive London Dispersion potential: I … ionization energy of atoms  1,  2 polarizabilities of atoms Repulsive potential from electron cloud: Strong force when r is small, m = 5 to 12 Combining them we get the van der Waals potential: And for m = 12 the Lennard-Jones potential: A, B are constants that depend on the type of interacting atoms in table 3.4 (~ 0 - 40 kJ/mole, very short range)

10 Hydrogen-bonds Important for protein/DNA stability Easy make-easy break, directional  requires very accurate alignment. 11 22 D-H …………. A This potential is added to the dipole-dipole interaction and only contributes ~ 2 KJ/mole of energy. H-bonds – it is still debated how to treat H-bond potential. Treat like dipole-dipole interaction (4-48 kJ/mole). Best alignment (diagram) gives: However, some aspects of H-bond are similar to covalent bonds – e.g. the optimal distance between donor and acceptor is very short (see next page)! So, model that by a van der Waals potential: C, D depend on the particular donor and acceptor In real life, we need to consider H-bonding to water too!! So unless solvent is accounted for, H-bonding affect is overestimated. Hydrogen bond are important in the inside of proteins and DNA (obviously). (0-48 kJ/mole, very short range, directional  provide specificity)

11 H-bond examples Watson-Crick base- pairing

12  -helix (© by Irvine Geis) Biochemistry Voet & Voet Red – oxygen Black – carbon Blue – nitrogen Purple – R-group White – C  Hydrogen-bonds between C-O of n th and N-H group of n+4 th residue. Non-Watson-Crick base-pairing Watson-Crick base- pairing


Download ppt "Homework 2 (due We, Feb. 1): Reading: Van Holde, Chapter 1 Van Holde Chapter 3.1 to 3.3 Van Holde Chapter 2 (we’ll go through Chapters 1 and 3 first. 1.Van."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google