1. Federal Aviation Administration Newark Project Overview January 2009

2. 2 Federal Aviation Administration BACKGROUND Continental Airlines Approached FAA in December 2007 to conduct a GBAS demonstration at Newark Initial Project Newark Briefing – Jan 2008 –Concept Proposed by Port Authority, Continental, Boeing, FAA, and Honeywell AOA-1 Briefing - May 2008 AOA-1 Supported Project – Jun 2008 Coordination Meeting NY TRACON – Jul 2008 Monthly Coordination Meetings – Aug to present Port Authority Board Approved Funding – Dec 2008 Continental Management Approval – Dec 2008 FAA Project Scope Agreement – Dec 2008 Draft MOU Being Developed, Pending Coordination

3. 3 Federal Aviation Administration Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) Precision Approach For CAT- I, II, III Multiple Runway Coverage At An Airport 3D RNP Procedures (RTA), CDAs Navigation for Closely Spaced Parallels Super Density Operations

4. 4 Federal Aviation Administration GBAS Pathway Forward Cat-I System Design Approval at Memphis – 2009 Cat-III Prototype Validation by - 2010 Cat-III System Design Approval by - 2012

5. 5 Federal Aviation Administration Agana, Guam Frankfurt, Germany Rio De Janeiro, Brazil Malaga, Spain LAAS/GBAS International Efforts Sydney, Australia Bremen, Germany

6. 6 Federal Aviation Administration Newark Project Establish Agreement Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) Continental Airlines FAA A Single LAAS Unit Will Be Installed at Newark Airport –Will Serve Multiple Runway Ends –Reduce Ground Delay and Ground Stops –Respond to Initiatives Recommended by the PANYNJ Flight Delay Task Force Report –Flight Test with Continental Airlines B-737’s –Overlay of Existing ILS Procedures To conduct an operational demonstration project using the satellite navigation technology of the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) –Demonstrate the Operational Capabilities of LAAS in a Complex Airspace Environment to Achieve Efficiency, Safety and Capacity Enhancements –To Support Aircraft/Airspace Separation in a Highly Congested Area MISSION PARTNERSHIPSCOPE

7. 7 Federal Aviation Administration Newark Project Partner Contributions Procure the Honeywell SLS-4000 LAAS Complete Site Preparation Install SLS-4000 System Provide Maintenance and Support Complete Facility and Service Approval for Cat I Operations Equip 15 B-737NG Aircraft with LAAS Avionics (STC) Support FAA Data Collection Activities Apply for Special Approval for LAAS Cat I Operations Conduct Flight Test Operations Support Procedure Development and Simulation Develop GLS Overlay Procedures Provide Data Collection Equipment Develop and Coordinate Prototype Terminal Procedures Collect Data and Analyze Performance Support GBAS Facility and Service Approval FAA PANYNJContinental

8. ARP GIMEE PFAF GP 2459 AYRON OM 1500 ILS 22L RW29 2.35 NM GIMEE 2500 GIMEE 3500 EWRBT GP 2000 (FAF) EWRBB 3000 EWRAA (FROP) GP 823 EWRBA GP 2459 COL R-023 KEWR RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 29 (VIA RWY 22L) ILS 22L

9. ARP ILS 4R EWRAT GP 2000 DOOIN 1700 RW29 2.35 NM EWRAA (FROP) GP 823 (FAF) EWRAC 3000 EWRAB GP 2328 COL R-023 KEWR RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 29 (VIA RWY 4R) DOOIN 3000

10. 10 Federal Aviation Administration Animations

11. 11 Federal Aviation Administration

12. 12 Federal Aviation Administration Questions?

13. 13 Federal Aviation Administration Newark Team New York TRACON and Eastern Service Center ATC, New York Tower Mgmt Newark Airport Teterboro User Group/Morristown User Group New York Eastern Region Helicopter Council Continental Airlines New York Port Authority Honeywell FAA GNSS Operational Implementation Team FAA Technical Center FAA RNP Office, AVN, AFS

14. 14 Federal Aviation Administration Points of Contact PANYNJ Port Authority – Tom Bock NY TRACON – Tony Russo NY Tower Management – Leo Prusak Continental Airlines - Glenn Morse/Ron Renk Newark Tower – Ed Masterson AVN Procedures – Pete Gertz AFS 400 – Katherine Majuskias RNP Program Office – Nick Tolman WJHTC – Paula Nourgas

15. 15 Federal Aviation Administration Terminal Area Capacity Benefits Pre-defined Terminal RNAV/RNP Routes Can Develop Tubular Routes With Lateral and Vertical Performance Requirements Enhanced Arrival Spacing and Timing Defined Sequencing and Merging Routes By Type Aircraft With Deceleration Phases ILS Critical Area Elimination For Increased Arrivals and Departures Optimum Flexibility For Dynamic Routing