Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Joint Meeting eDiscovery Joint Session with the Association of Records Managers and Administrators, NYC Chapter (ARMA), Paralegals and Litigation Support.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Joint Meeting eDiscovery Joint Session with the Association of Records Managers and Administrators, NYC Chapter (ARMA), Paralegals and Litigation Support."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Joint Meeting eDiscovery Joint Session with the Association of Records Managers and Administrators, NYC Chapter (ARMA), Paralegals and Litigation Support Working Group (PALS) and Women in eDiscovery (WIE) Moderator: Joe Bartolo, J.D.

3 Joint Meeting Panelist: Alan Winchester, Esq.

4 Joint Meeting Panelist: Rudy Moliere

5 Joint Meeting Panelist: Hon. Ronald J. Hedges (retired)

6 Joint Meeting Panelist: Salvatore Mancuso

7

8 Topic 1: Predictive Coding (PC) as an emerging trend ("buzzword") - what's all the buzz about? What is PC exactly, and how does it fit into TAR (Technology Assisted Review) a/k/a CAR (Computer Assisted Review) - or does it?

9 WWW.EDRM.NET

10 Topic 2: What are the benefits of using processes such as TAR/CAR or PC versus a traditional linear review?

11 Topic 3: What are some of the differences in using TAR/CAR for various purposes: (a) records management; (b) investigations and early case assessment; and (c) Litigation (civil or criminal). Is there is downstream use for PC for Information Governance Purposes? (Predictive Filing?)

12 WWW.EDRM.NET

13

14 Topic 4: Have paralegals been placed on remediation projects of large data sets, and can they see this as a tool? If paralegals are in the position where they will be asked to interact with this technology, are TAR/CAR and PC white horses for potential challenges?

15

16 Topic 5: What is involved in the process of generating a random “Sample”? What are some best practices regarding “Sampling” of the “Active” and “Null” sets to validate the results of TAR and “Clustering”?

17 eDISCOVERY TEAM®

18 Topic 6: CAR/TAR (and PC) have not been accepted in any litigation other than at a threshold level. Should there be "transparency? What does that mean in actual litigation practice?

19 Topic 7: How should attorneys defend the process of using TAR/CAR (and/or PC), if challenged?

20 Concluding Remarks Questions & Answers

21 Thank You for Attending Special thanks to NYCPA; ARMA; Women in eDiscovery – New York Chapter; PALS; Event Sponsors: Polygon and Subject Matter Expert Panelists; All those who participated in planning; NBC Studios.


Download ppt "Joint Meeting eDiscovery Joint Session with the Association of Records Managers and Administrators, NYC Chapter (ARMA), Paralegals and Litigation Support."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google