1. Discussion Regarding Changes to the Household Hazardous Waste Grant Program

2. Purpose Present BACKGROUND on HHW Grant Program Present BACKGROUND on HHW Grant Program Discuss TRENDS in HHW collection Discuss TRENDS in HHW collection Stimulate discussion of changes Stimulate discussion of changes

3. Item History Board establishes annual program criteria Board establishes annual program criteria Sept. Award of grants raised questions about cost- effectiveness of projects Sept. Award of grants raised questions about cost- effectiveness of projects This begins discussion for FY 04/05 Criteria (Jan ’04) This begins discussion for FY 04/05 Criteria (Jan ’04)

4. Program Criteria Statute driven: Changes in 1992 and 1993 shift focus to: Statute driven: Changes in 1992 and 1993 shift focus to:  Rural, Underserved & Small  Regional programs  Collection of targeted waste types, innovative or more cost-effective methods & education

5. Program History 12 Cycles of Funding 12 Cycles of Funding Average funding level $3M until this cycle at $4.5M Average funding level $3M until this cycle at $4.5M $323 Million funded $323 Million funded 290 grants 290 grants Attachment 1

6. TRENDS SB 20 E-Waste SB 20 E-Waste  Generates fee for recycling  May eliminate need for HHW grant priority to collect E-waste

7. TRENDS On-Going O&M for Locals On-Going O&M for Locals  O&M costs have not been eligible expenses  Some locals are strapped to cover these costs after CIWMB “invests” in local facilities

8. TRENDS Cost-Effectiveness Cost-Effectiveness  Permanent Facilities Most Cost-Effective  Other options (curbside & door-to-door) good for special needs clients

9. TRENDS Permanent Facilities Permanent Facilities  21 counties or 1/3 of state  San Bernardino has more than any county (16)  LA and San Diego have 7 facilities each Attachment 2

10. TRENDS Door-to-Door or Curbside Door-to-Door or Curbside  Meets Needs of elderly, disabled or homebound  Costs can vary depending on community  Issue: Should they be served before infrastructure needs?

11. TRENDS Ranking Based On Need Ranking Based On Need  Model-- Rubberized Asphalt Concrete (RAC) Grant program  Formula requires baseline data & strategic goals  Streamlines grant review

12. Partnership Opportunity Bi-Monthly Info. Exchanges Bi-Monthly Info. Exchanges  No/So meetings already scheduled  Stakeholders attend and are actively engaged  Forum for sharing “best practices”

13. Partnership Opportunity On-line HHW Listserv On-line HHW Listserv  Opportunity for all to provide feedback & input  Stakeholders already participate  Forum for sharing “best practices”

14. Partnership Opportunity Annual Forum/Conference Annual Forum/Conference  March 2004 in Sacramento  Agenda in formative stage  Easy for Board to participate

15. Some Options to Consider Non-competitive Program based on Population Non-competitive Program based on Population ½ $$$ for Facilities on priority list + ½ $$$ on per capita basis, including O&M ½ $$$ for Facilities on priority list + ½ $$$ on per capita basis, including O&M 2 Phase Award—Yr 1: facility planning; Yr 2: Construction 2 Phase Award—Yr 1: facility planning; Yr 2: Construction

16. FY 2004/05 HD13 Grants Criteria Item to Board in Jan Criteria Item to Board in Jan Applications due in April Applications due in April Award Item in July ‘04 Award Item in July ‘04 Funding Level??? Funding Level???

17. HD13 Questions/Issues Types of Programs Board would like to emphasize Types of Programs Board would like to emphasize Funding for E-Waste?? Funding for E-Waste?? How to rate or score Cost- Effectiveness? How to rate or score Cost- Effectiveness? Role for door-to-door or curbside collection? Role for door-to-door or curbside collection?