Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 1 Short Slot Time Option for TGg Updated Version Richard van Nee, Woodside.

Published byTheodore Williams Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 1 Short Slot Time Option for TGg Updated Version Richard van Nee, Woodside."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 1 Short Slot Time Option for TGg Updated Version Richard van Nee, Woodside Networks Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments

2 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 2 TGg Slot Time Proposal Context Strong support for enhancing.11g throughput by introducing the possibility for short slot-times Key issues were raised regarding the proposal This presentation addresses these issues and will be accompanied by a text document

3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 3 TGg Slot Time Current draft 11g use pure IEEE 802.11a, except for slot time which is the longer 802.11b slot time Longer slot time significantly reduces throughput compared to 802.11a at 5 GHz TGg currently has no migration path towards an 11g-only network that is as fast as 802.11a at 5 GHz

4 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 4 Throughput and Slot Time Each packet involves a significant wait time of SIFS+DIFS+Backoff, that is proportional to the slot time MAC Throughput = Rate·T data /(2*T preamble +T data +T ack +SIFS+DIFS+T backoff ) DataPreamble ACKPreamble SIFS DIFSBackoff

5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 5 69121824364854 Raw Data Rate [Mbps] Throughput [Mbps] Throughput.11g versus.11a 31 Mbps throughput for.11a versus less than 25 Mbps for.11g at 54 Mbps mode Note: Throughput estimates without RTS/CTS using 1500 bytes packet length 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 red: 9µs slot time (.11a) blue: 20µs slot time (current.11g)

6 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 6 Short Slot Time One of the intents of the initial 11g draft was to create a migration path to pure 802.11a in 2.4 GHz Current 11g draft does not fully meet this goal Solution: have an optional mode to use the 9 µs 802.11a short slot time

7 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 7 How does it work? Introduce Short Slot Time Subfield in Capability Information Field (Extended Capability Information bit, or Beacon Information Element) Access point signals the optional short slot time mode in beacon by setting Short Slot Time Subfield to 1 If a non-short slot time device* associates, access point sets Short Slot Time Subfield to 0 All.11g devices change slot time when seeing a change in the beacon Short Slot Time Subfield * non-short slot time device: Legacy 11b device or 11g device with Short Slot Time Subfield = 0 in its association request

8 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 8 Impact on Legacy Devices Impact at association when b0=0 (short slot time) :  Legacy devices associate using a slot time that is too long  No impact on receiving (assuming beacons are transmitted on an 11b rate), but some minor impact on transmitting association request due to:  Legacy backoff delay is on average four times as long as that of an.11g device using a short slot time  Impact is a somewhat larger delay in association because the legacy association effectively gets a lower priority than.11g short slot time packets After association of first legacy device, no further impact on legacy devices as access point switches back to.11b slot time

9 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 9 Summary of Benefits Seamless migration path towards an.11g network that is as fast as.11a More efficient use of the wireless medium in the 2.4 GHz band when feasible Possibility to significantly improve throughput in both the mandatory.11g mode and the two optional modes (CCK/OFDM and PBCC) More future-proof standard, anticipates a 2.4 GHz network setting where there will be no legacy.11b devices

10 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 10 Issues to be Addressed 1.20 us cannot be denied association 2.9us overlapping BSS should not disadvantage adjacent 20us BSS 3.Choice of slot time shouldn’t be constrained to 9us and 20us only 4.IBSS mode not defined

11 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 11 Issue 1. 20us STA cannot be denied association If a 20 us device associates, the AP has to revert back to the 20 us mode immediately after the first Beacon subsequent to the association

12 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 12 Issue 2. 9us overlapping BSS should not disadvantage adjacent 20us BSS In the case of a network composed of only short slot-time devices, but with knowledge of a neighboring co-channel BSS having longer slot-time traffic, the AP shall switch to the longest slot-time of the overlapping BSS’s

13 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 13 Issue 3. Choice of slot time shouldn’t be constrained to 9us and 20us only 802.11b implementations usually need longer than 9us for CCA It may be advantageous to enable.11g slot- times longer then 9us, but shorter than 20us to allow for the throughput enhancements AND the longer.11b CCA requirements

14 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 14 Issue 3. Choice of slot time shouldn’t be constrained to 9us and 20us only (cont) Three Possibilities A.Include a variable slot time with the following format: 20us minus the short slot-time subfield (4bit number between 0 – 15 or 0 - 11) B.Include a 9us, a 15us and a 20us slot-time option C.Only include the existing 9us.11a slot-time and 20us.11b slot time (per original proposal)

15 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 15 Issue 4. IBSS Mode not defined Recommended practice: Only enable 20us long slot-time for IBSS mode

16 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 16 Back Up Slides

17 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 17 Motion Instruct the editor to add the text contained in document……………… titled…………..an optional short slot time mode to the draft TGg standard…………

18 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 18 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 69121824364854 Raw Data Rate [Mbps] Throughput [Mbps] Throughput.11g versus.11a for 500 Byte Packets 16.8 Mbps throughput for.11a versus 11.7 Mbps for.11g at 54 Mbps mode red: 9µs slot time (.11a) blue: 20µs slot time (.11g) Note: Throughput estimates without RTS/CTS, using 500 bytes packet length

19 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 19 11.G Throughputs (In Mbps, 1500 Bytes Packets) Phy Rate.11g with RTS/CTS 11g without RTS/CTS, long slot time 11g. with short slot time 64.85.35.5 96.57.48.0 128.09.410.3 1810.212.814.4 2412.015.618.0 3614.419.924.1 4816.023.229.0 5416.624.531.1

Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 1 Short Slot Time Option for TGg Updated Version Richard van Nee, Woodside."

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April 2006 06/543r0 Richard van.

Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.
Short MAC Header Date: Authors: John Doe, Some Company

Short MAC Header Date: Authors: John Doe, Some Company
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Date: 2010-04-30 Fast Session Transfer May 2010 L. Cariou, Orange LabsSlide 1 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Date: Fast Session Transfer May 2010 L. Cariou, Orange LabsSlide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0528r0 Submission March 2010 Slide 1 Slot Time Synchronization for Coexistence of 5 MHz, 10 MHz and 20 MHz Systems Date: 2010-05-11.

Doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Submission March 2010 Slide 1 Slot Time Synchronization for Coexistence of 5 MHz, 10 MHz and 20 MHz Systems Date:
IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN Standard. Medium Access Control-CSMA/CA IEEE 802.11 defines two MAC sublayers Distributed coordination function (DCF) Point coordination.

IEEE Wireless LAN Standard. Medium Access Control-CSMA/CA IEEE defines two MAC sublayers Distributed coordination function (DCF) Point coordination.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1054r0 Submission Sep. 2012 Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: 2012-09-07 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1468r0 Submission Dec 2008 Ashish Shukla, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 ERP Protection in IEEE 802.11s Mesh Network Date: 2008-12-12.

Doc.: IEEE /1468r0 Submission Dec 2008 Ashish Shukla, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 ERP Protection in IEEE s Mesh Network Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/0801r1 Akira Kishida, NTT Issues of Low-Rate Transmission Date: 2013-07-18 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0801r1 Akira Kishida, NTT Issues of Low-Rate Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0871r0 Submission June 2011 Power Saving in Beam Beamforming for 11ad Date: 2011-06-16 Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission June 2011 Power Saving in Beam Beamforming for 11ad Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: 2012-03-05 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0094r2 Submission Jan 2012 Slide 1 Authors: MAC Header Design for Small Data Packet for 802.11ah Date: 2012-01-18 Lv kaiying, ZTE.

Doc.: IEEE /0094r2 Submission Jan 2012 Slide 1 Authors: MAC Header Design for Small Data Packet for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/065r0 Submission January 2001 Brockmann, Hoeben, Wentink (Intersil) 802.11g MAC Analysis Menzo Wentink Ron Brockmann.

Doc.: IEEE /065r0 Submission January 2001 Brockmann, Hoeben, Wentink (Intersil) g MAC Analysis Menzo Wentink Ron Brockmann.
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1085r0 September 2015 Del Carpio (Ericsson)Slide 1 6LoWPAN over 802.11 Date: 2015-09-13 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1085r0 September 2015 Del Carpio (Ericsson)Slide 1 6LoWPAN over Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: 2012-07-06 July 2012.

Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 BSS Load: AP Loading Metric for QOS Joe Kwak InterDigital doc: IEEE 802.11-05/0079r1May 2005.

SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 BSS Load: AP Loading Metric for QOS Joe Kwak InterDigital doc: IEEE /0079r1May 2005.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: 2012-01-16 Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.

Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: 2012-09-17 Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/188 Submission July 2000 Jan Boer, Lucent TechnologiesSlide 1 OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band Jan Boer, Lucent Technologies.

Doc.: IEEE /188 Submission July 2000 Jan Boer, Lucent TechnologiesSlide 1 OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band Jan Boer, Lucent Technologies.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/1032r1 Submission September 2004 Hiroyuki Nakase, Tohoku Univ.Slide 1 Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput. Tohoku University.

Doc.: IEEE /1032r1 Submission September 2004 Hiroyuki Nakase, Tohoku Univ.Slide 1 Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput. Tohoku University.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/308r0 Submission May 2002 Y Inoue, et.al.,NTT Laboratories Slide 1 Next Generation Wireless LANs Yasuhiko Inoue, Tetsu Sakata and.

Doc.: IEEE /308r0 Submission May 2002 Y Inoue, et.al.,NTT Laboratories Slide 1 Next Generation Wireless LANs Yasuhiko Inoue, Tetsu Sakata and.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google