Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Distortion of single-shot EO sampling techniques.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Distortion of single-shot EO sampling techniques."— Presentation transcript:

1 Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Distortion of single-shot EO sampling techniques in measuring particle beam profiles and SR application Yuelin Li Accelerator Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory ICFA: Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings Frascati, Italy, Nov. 7-8, 2005

2 2 Acknowlegement K. -J. Kim, K. Harkay, moral, financial support J. Wang, E. Landahl, real estate surpport P. Bolton, X. Zhang, helpful discussion Work supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38.

3 3 Measuring ultrashort electron beam using electro optical sampling (001) z (110) x y p p  r : crystal residual or bias birefringence. E E beam Laser P1 P2 e beam Probe laser

4 4 EO history and its application in beam measurement Observation of optical rectification, 1962 Bass et al., PRL 9, 446 (1962) Demonstration of picosecond optical sampling, 1982 Valadmanis et al, APL 41, 212, (1982) Demonstration of single-shot EO techniques, 2000- Chirped laser pulse, Jiang and Zhang, APL 72, 1945 (1998) THz/Probe correlation, Shan et al, OL 25, 426 (2000) Double correlation, Jamison et al, OL 28, 1710 (2003) FROG EO: proposed by Bolton (2002) Application in beam measurement, 1998- –FNAL and BNL: 100 ps- ns temporal resolution –FELIX: Yan et al., PRL 85, 3404 (2000); –FELIX: Wilke et al., PRL 88, 124801 (2002), 2 ps –FELIX: Berden et al., PRL 93, 114802 (2004), 300 fs –SLAC/SPPS: Cavalieri et al., PRL 94, 114801 (2005), 300 fs

5 5 What’s left? Choice of single-shot techniques –Chirped probe pulse mapping –Probe laser cross correlation –“Real” time-resolved Distortions and corrections for precision measurement –Identification of distortion effects –Crystal orientation? –Known effect: group velocity mismatch, crystal response Better temporal resolution –Physical limit: crystal response and choice of techniques Application beyond short bunch measurement for linac beam –Scenario for SR applications

6 6 Off-line EO testing experiment Replace the particle beam with an EM impulse, i.e., THz pulse P1 P2 e beam Probe laser P1 P2 THz Probe laser Pump laser Differences from a THz experiment –Particle beam fields has a zero carrier frequency –Particle beam may deliver much higher field strength –Particle beams require single-shot measurement

7 7 Experiment setup Shan et al, Opt Lett 25, 426 (2000). Pump/Probe duration: 70 fs Pump Energy: 0.8 mJ/pulse Probe: 0.08 mJ/pulse Adjustment of pump intensity Adjustment of sampling crystal angle Adjustment optical bias  r Time 0.28 ps

8 8 Effect of optical bias The signal can be linear or nonlinear depends on the relative magnitude of  r and  The signal can flip sign artificially! Background Raw data Background subtracted

9 9 Intensity distortion

10 10 Correction and caution These distortion are important for near zero optical (crossed polarizer) configuration. –Recent SLAC and FELIX experiments are performed in this region In general, correction is impossible if signal sign flipping occurs, i.e., the beam induced phase shift becomes larger than the residue/bias and has an opposite sign. –[Jiang et al., APL 74, 1191 (1999)] To avoid artificial sign flipping and distortion –Working with large optical bias up to quarter wave to maintain linearity (balanced detector) –If have to work at near to zero bias, proper orientation of the sampling crystal is needed to make the residue in line with the expected field orientation.

11 11 Dependence on sampling crystal orientation: unexpected Planken eta l., JOSA B18, 313 (2001)

12 12 Experimental waveform at different angles First observation of orientation dependence in this geometry May have to do with the tilt of the crystal? Further investigation is needed Waveform at angles are completely different

13 13 SR applications beam profile and position monitor in 1 Linac: obvious –SASE, etc Storage ring: turn by turn profile monitor –Short bunch/CSR instability/CSR radiation (Kuske, Byrd) –Femto slicing (Byrd, Baeck) –Tilted beam (K. Harkay, Borland) –Microwave instability/bursting mode –Charge fluctuation –Bunch length modulation (Biscari) –Timing monitor for pump probe experiment

14 14 SR application example 1 Microwave instability E beam:12 nC Laser: 2% bandwidth @ 800 nm, stretched to 60 ps rms Crystal:0.1 mm ZnTe @ 1 cm from the beam A 0.015% white noise is added to simulate the noise level of a 16 bit detector. 40 ps rms bunch + modulation (3 ps, 2%)

15 15 SR application 2: Timing monitor for pump-probe experiment Locking the laser to the pump/probe laser Observe the relative shift of the bunch in respect to the laser pulse E beam:40 ps, 12 nC Laser:2% BW @ 800 nm, 100 ps Crystal:0.1 mm ZnTe @ 1 cm 0.015% white noise added to simulate a realistic situation for a 16 bit camera. Bunch oscillation in bucket by 10 ps

16 16 Summary Distortion at near zero optical bias –Artificial flipping of field sign –Quadratic signal dependence on the field under investigation –Dependence on the orientation of the sampling crystal Application in SR –As beam profile monitor/transverse motion monitor –As timing monitor for pump-probe experiment –…. Future work needed: –Clarify the angular dependence of the crystal orientation –Crystal property measurement: to reach the limit of the technique


Download ppt "Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Distortion of single-shot EO sampling techniques."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google