1. 1 The Clean Air Rules of 2005 Bill Wehrum U.S. EPA, Office of Air & Radiation

2. 2 CAIR Health and Environmental Benefits: Benefits over 25 Times Greater than Costs By 2015, CAIR will result in $85-100 billion in health benefits each year, preventing: 17,000 premature deaths 22,000 non-fatal heart attacks 12,300 hospital admissions 1.7 million lost work days 500,000 lost school days. Almost $2 billion in improved visibility benefits each year. Other non-monetized benefits – reductions of mercury emissions, acid rain, nitrification, eutrophication, and more. In 2015, CAIR will cost about $3.6 billion a year. Implementation beyond 2015 leads to higher annual benefits and costs.

3. 3 CAIR and Other Major Air Pollution Rules Since 1990: Annual Emission Reductions at Full Implementation *These reductions are calculated from 2003 levels and do not reflect the full phase in of the acid rain program. Full implementation for mobile source rules is 2030. Full implementation for the CAIR is between 2020 and 2025.

4. Clean Air Interstate Rule and Other Major Air Pollution Rules Since 1990: Annual Benefits Notes: NOx SIP Call benefits are inflated from 1990 dollars and represent the higher range of projected final rule benefits. A discount rate of 3% is used for the benefits calculation. For CAIR, an alternative 7% discount rate would yield roughly $86 billion of benefits in 2015. 20152030 2004 Benefits of CAIR will continue to increase post-2015

5. 5 CAIR and Other Major Air Pollution Rules Since 1990: Annual Private Compliance Costs at Full Implementation Notes: Annual Costs are EPA projections. NOx SIP Call costs were inflated from 1990 dollars. Full implementation for mobile source rules is 2030. CAIR represents a substantial investment in cleaner air, and projected benefits are over 25 times greater than the projected costs.

6. 6 National NO x and SO 2 Power Plant Emissions: Historic and Projected with CAIR Source: EPA

7. 7 In the East, Regional Emissions Contribute Significantly to Local Nonattainment Problems Because emissions are often transported across state boundaries, both regional and local action is needed to address air quality issues. Federal action would significantly reduce the burden on state and local governments by addressing transport. Urban v. Regional Contribution to PM Concentrations (2000-2002 Average, ug/m3) Washington 0 5 10 15 20 25 St.Louis Birmingham Indianapolis Atlanta Cleveland Charlotte Richmond Bronx Baltimore Urban IncrementRegional Contribution

8. 8 Areas Designated Nonattainment for Ozone and PM 2.5 NAAQS in 2004 Nonattainment areas for both 8-hour ozone and fine particle pollution Nonattainment areas for fine particle pollution only Nonattainment areas for 8-hour ozone pollution only 126 ozone nonattainment areas with 474 counties 47 PM 2.5 nonattainment areas with 224 counties

9. Ozone and Fine Particle Nonattainment Areas (March 2005) Projected Nonattainment Areas in 2015 after Reductions from CAIR and Existing Clean Air Act Programs Projections concerning future levels of air pollution in specific geographic locations were estimated using the best scientific models available. They are estimations, however, and should be characterized as such in any description. Actual results may vary significantly if any of the factors that influence air quality differ from the assumed values used in the projections shown here. Ozone and Particle Pollution: CAIR, together with other Clean Air Programs, Will Bring Cleaner Air to Areas in the East - 2015 Nonattainment areas for both 8-hour ozone and fine particle pollution Nonattainment areas for fine particle pollution only Nonattainment areas for 8-hour ozone pollution only 104 ozone nonattainment areas with 408 counties 43 PM 2.5 nonattainment areas with 211 counties 5 ozone nonattainment areas 14 PM 2.5 nonattainment areas

10. 10 Two Ways to Address Transported Emissions from Power Plants The President’s Clear Skies legislation is the preferred approach to achieving multi-pollutant emission reductions: –Multipollution caps apply to entire country. –Legislation can provide more certainty and less complexity. Use of existing Clean Air Act authority to address interstate transport of pollution: –Until legislation passes, our attainment deadlines and other problems related to power plant emissions demand we act now. –CAIR will provide very significant air quality attainment, health, and environmental improvements across the eastern U.S. in a highly cost-effective manner.

11. 11 CAIR Implementation The Clean Air Interstate Rule uses an approach that is similar to the NOx SIP Call but contains improvements, including: –Fewer complexities –No Flow Control –Facility Level Compliance vs. Unit Level

12. 12 In 2015, annual visibility benefits would be almost $2 billion for improvements in southeastern national parks, such as Great Smoky and Shenandoah, and forests. CAIR will reduce the number of acidic lakes ─ significant regional reductions in sulfur and nitrogen deposition are projected to benefit lakes and streams in the eastern U.S. *Note: The figure presents results for chronic acidity only in modeled lakes. As such, model results apply to a subset of lakes in the Adirondacks and cannot be generalized to all waters in that area. These results do not include lakes that experience episodic acidification, or short periods of low Acid Neutralizing Capacity or high acidity, during storms or snowmelt. A significant proportion of Adirondack lakes could still experience episodic acidification at levels potentially harmful to fish and other aquatic species. CAIR Delivers Considerable Environmental Benefits Northeast Region ─ Chronic acidity would be dramatically reduced by 2030 (only 1% of lakes would remain chronically acidic).* Adirondack Mountains ─ Eliminates chronic acidity from lakes in the Adirondacks* Southeast Region ─ Slows the rate of stream acidification. Reductions in nitrogen deposition will benefit sensitive coastal ecosystems. 21% 12% 0 %

13. 13 Visibility (2020) Under Clear Skies visibility in a large portion of the East and Midwest would improve 2-3 deciviews from current levels visibility along the southern Appalachian Mountains would improve more than 3 deciviews Clear Skies would improve visibility in the East and Midwest 1-2 deciviews beyond what is expected under existing programs Under Clear Skies the WRAP agreement will be honored and the emissions reductions are expected to take effect allow future growth in the West to occur without degrading visibility Deciview Change (On this map, a positive change in deciview is an improvement in visibility; an negative change in deciview is a decrease in visibility.) Deciview Change 1996 vs. 2020 with Clear Skies Deciview Change 2020 Base Case vs. Clear Skies

14. 14 220 tons 195 tons 120 tons Source: EPA 1990, 1996 NTI and EPA 1999 NEI. Short tons per year. Adjusted for gold mines in 1990 and 1996. *The 1990 and 1996 NEI did not include gold mining emissions data. The emissions shown here for gold mines in those years are assumed to be equal to emissions for those mines in 1999.EPA 1999 NEI Mercury Emissions Have Dropped 45% Since 1990

15. 15 Average Mercury Concentrations for Top 24 Types of Fish Consumed in U.S. Commercial Seafood Market * Includes both canned light and albacore tuna * Source: Carrington and Bolger, 2002 cited in NESCAUM briefing to EPA

16. 16 Mercury Emissions Are a Global Problem Source: Based on Pacyna, J., Munthe J., Presentation at Workshop on Mercury, Brussels, March 29-30, 2004 1999 Global Mercury Emissions

17. Mercury Deposition in the U.S. Tons of Mercury 2001 deposition from U.S. utilities 2020 deposition from U.S. utilities after CAIR, Clean Air Mercury Rule & other Clean Air Act programs Tons of Mercury 144.23 U.S. Mercury Deposition from U.S. Utilities Total Mercury Deposition in the U.S. Source: U.S. EPA 2005 = 2001total deposition in the U.S. from all sources, domestic and global = 2001 deposition in the U.S. from U.S. utilities

18. 18 About 1,300 coal-fired generation units (~ 500 coal- fired power plants), representing about 305 GW of generation capacity Existing Controls: –Almost all units have particulate matter (PM) control devices –About one-third of capacity has SO 2 scrubbers –Most have initial NOx controls (low-NOx burners) –About one-third of the capacity (primarily in the east) will have advanced NOx control (SCR) when NOx SIP call is fully implemented Coal Fired Power Plants in the U.S.

19. 19 Mercury Capture in Existing Equipment Removal in PM Controls Hg can be adsorbed onto unburned carbon surfaces, and captured in cold-side ESPs or FFs Capture in Wet Scrubbers Hg(II) capture depends on solubility of each compound; Hg(0) is insoluble and cannot be easily captured Capture enhanced by upstream SCR for bituminous coal-fired boilers

20. 20 Emerging Mercury Control Technologies

21. 21 Enhancing Hg Removal in Wet Scrubbers SCR – ongoing full-scale measurements: ~85- 90+% Hg removal for SCR + PM control + wet scrubber with bituminous coals; performance with low-rank coals uncertain. Effects of catalyst volume and aging and optimization of SCR for Hg capture need investigation. Oxidizing catalysts and chemicals – under development FGD chemical additive – tests have been conducted at 3 sites; (1)limestone forced oxidation (LSFO) scrubber - successful in suppressing Hg re-emission, which results from part of the Hg absorbed in the scrubber solution getting converted to the insoluble Hg(0). (2)magnesium-enhanced lime scrubber – not successful in suppressing Hg re-emission. (3)LSFO with SCR – without SCR, additive was successful in suppressing Hg re-emission (Hg removal in scrubber improved from 70% to 78%); there was no need for additive with SCR, in which case more than 90% of Hg was removed in the scrubber. Increase the amount of Hg(II) in flue gas Coal & Air Oxidizing Chemicals Wet Scrubber SCR Oxidizing Catalysts Residue Stack Ash PM Control

22. 22 The extent of capture depends on: Sorbent characteristics (particle size distribution, porosity, capacity at different gas temperatures) Residence time in the flue gas Type of PM control (FF vs. ESP) Concentrations of SO 3 and other contaminants Sorbent Injection Sorbent injection + Compact Hybrid Particulate Collector (COHPAC TM ) Potential solution to ash reuse problems coal Option 2: Electric Power Research Institute’s (EPRI) TOXECON™ System Option1 ESP coal sorbent injection fly ash + sorbent ESP sorbent injection fly ash (99%) fly ash(1%) + sorbent COHPAC™ Sorbent is injected upstream of the PM control device (ESP or FF) Collected fly ash and sorbent are mixed

23. 23 Activated Carbon Injection (ACI) Activated carbon injection system Activated carbon storage and feed system ACI has successfully been used to reduce mercury emissions from waste combustors. Efforts are underway to transfer to coal-fired power plants. ACI is currently only being used in demonstration projects.