Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Resolving Special Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Resolving Special Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson."— Presentation transcript:

1 Resolving Special Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson

2 About Me Professor of Law at Concord Law School Hearing Officer with NH Dept. of Education NHEdLaw, LLC www.nhedlaw.com Education Law Resource Center www.edlawrc.com

3 Overview Talk about basic ways to resolve disputes under IDEA Talk about some changes in IDEIA Talk about some specific mediation approaches and ways to resolve disputes Talk through a scenario This PowerPoint is available at www.nhedlaw.com

4 IDEIA Will cover three ways to resolve disputes: neutral evaluation, mediation, due process/court. Some changes to dispute resolution in IDEIA Mostly in the area relating to due process hearings in terms of process and notice.

5 Neutral evaluation Opinion from hearing officer about strengths and weaknesses Present limited evidence in writing and make arguments. Hearing officer makes recommendation on how they would rule. Parties can accept or reject. Not bound if reject Process is confidential

6 Mediation Parties try to resolve differences with the help of a trained, neutral third party Confidential Provided at no cost to the parties If agree, becomes binding, written agreement that is enforceable in court Different methods can be used to help resolve disputes (discussed in detail in a minute)

7 IDEIA Now requires states to offer mediation at the outset Can request just mediation or mediation and due process Can request just mediation or mediation and due process My state of NH has offered it for sometime and schedules it when a hearing is requested

8 Due process Adversarial proceeding Witnesses, attorneys, hearing officer Parties have certain rights defined by statute in terms of presenting evidence, cross-examining witnesses, establishing a record and appealing. Hearing officer makes a decision Loser can appeal to state or federal court Attorney’s fees

9 IDEIA New law now requires the parties to have a “resolution meeting” before going to hearing when parent requests due process. Must happen in 15 days of request for hearing Like an IEP meeting, but a person with decision- making authority to resolve the dispute must attend Discuss the request for due process and school is give chance to resolve the issues

10 IDEIA If agree, written settlement agreement Buyers remorse for 3 days – both sides Have 30 days from request for hearing to resolve If can’t agree go to hearing or mediation/neutral evaluation School attorneys cannot attend unless parent attorney attends Parties can waive the meeting requirement by agreement or substitute mediation for it

11 IDEIA Law requires parties to be more specific in their requests for due process Can’t raise things that were not in the request Other party can ask for more information if request not sufficient – sufficiency hearings Idea is to put parties on notice of the issues to be addressed at hearing

12 Mediation General Approaches Positional negotiation Develop a position and insist the other person agree to it. Start at an extreme and work towards the middle Start near actual position and hold until the other person comes close enough to it

13 Positional negotiation Involves strength and weaknesses of the case. Each side attacks the other’s position and case. Threaten action if other person does not come to your position.

14 General Approaches Problem Solving approach. View things as a shared problem to be resolved by both sides. More work. Can produce a better, longer lasting outcome. Worked in Camp David Peace Accords for peace between Egypt and Israel.

15 Problem Solving Approach 7 Elements 1.Relationship between the parties 2.Communication between the parties 3.Each party’s Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA) 4.Interests of the parties 5.Creative options 6.Standards of Legitimacy 7.Commitment

16 Relationships Perhaps the most important part Working on it has its own intrinsic value and corollary benefits Treat others with respect Work on the relationship

17 Common relationship builders Bring food and drinks to meetings Be courteous Don’t retaliate Don’t personalize Don’t blame Don’t yell Express feelings but calmly

18 Scott’s Crazy Ideas Try to get to know the person. Meet outside of school and do something unrelated to special education. Invite the other person to do something with a project, school committee or outside of school group or committee.

19 Communication All participants have to really listen. Active listening Acknowledge things you agree with Clarify and confirm what speaker said Empathize

20 BATNA Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. What you could obtain without an agreement from the other person. Figure out the BATNA of others that are involved. Both sides want to work to an agreement that is better then their BATNA.

21 Interests Have to get to the underlying concerns. What the person “really wants.” Have to figure it out for all involved. Not always the specific solution on the table. That might just be the position. For example, an out of district placement could be an interest in ensuring a child reads.

22 Creative Solutions Not always obvious at first Brainstorm Don’t evaluate Don’t evaluate Don’t attach to a suggestion to early Don’t attach to a suggestion to early Talk through possible solutions with pros and cons Look for the solution that is a mutual gain for all involved.

23 Legitimacy Interests and options must be legitimate. Something the system and process can provide Bounds of legitimacy depend on the situation. With special education some of those bounds are legal ones. Others are fairness, reasonableness and the interests of the parties within their legal and ethical boundaries.

24 Commitment Occurs at the end Articulate precisely what each person is committing to. Works well with settlement agreement process.

25 Resources NH Special Education Law Manual: A Guide for Parents, Educators & Professionals, NHEdLaw, www.nhedlaw.com www.nhedlaw.com Harvard Law School Project on Negotiation www.pon.harvard.edu www.pon.harvard.edu National Center on Dispute Resolution. www.directionservice.org/cadre/indexdispres.cfm www.directionservice.org/cadre/indexdispres.cfm The Problem Solving Lawyer, www.harborhouselaw.com/articles/problemsolve.mpalmer.htm www.harborhouselaw.com/articles/problemsolve.mpalmer.htm New Hampshire Dept. of Education Dispute Resolution. www.ed.state.nh.us/education/laws/SpecialEducationandDueProces sHearingsandAlternativeDisputeResolution.htm www.ed.state.nh.us/education/laws/SpecialEducationandDueProces sHearingsandAlternativeDisputeResolution.htm www.ed.state.nh.us/education/laws/SpecialEducationandDueProces sHearingsandAlternativeDisputeResolution.htm Office of Special Education Programs Questions and Answers on Special Education Mediation. www.directionservice.org/cadre/vet_QAonmediation.cfm www.directionservice.org/cadre/vet_QAonmediation.cfm NHEdLaw, Other Helpful Resources page. www.nhedlaw.com/helpful.htm www.nhedlaw.com/helpful.htm


Download ppt "Resolving Special Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google