Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #1 1-Nov-15 Swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Final Presentation The Swarm E2E.

Published byGodwin Craig Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #1 1-Nov-15 Swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Final Presentation The Swarm E2E."— Presentation transcript:

1 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #1 1-Nov-15 Swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Final Presentation The Swarm E2E Consortium DSRI: Eigil Friis Christensen Flemming Hansen Alexei Kuvshinov Nils Olsen Per Lundahl Thomsen Susanne Vennerstrøm IPGP: Gauthier Hulot Mioara Mandea BGS: Vincent Lesur Susan Macmillan Alan Thomson GFZ: Monika Korte Hermann Lühr Stefan Maus Christoph Reigber Patricia Ritter Martin Rother GSFC: Michael Purucker Terence Sabaka IUEM: Pascal Tarits

2 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #2 1-Nov-15 Outline of Presentations Overview, Achieved Milestones (NIO) Results: Comprehensive Inversion (TJS) Results: Lithospheric Field Recovery Using Gradient Method (HL) Results: Mapping of 3D Mantle Inhomogeneities (NIO) Assessment (NIO) General discussion

3 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #3 1-Nov-15 Study Logic Task 1: Industrial Module –to be used by industry for their system simulation –Output: software (Matlab) + documentation Task 2+3: Swarm mission simulation –Determination and evaluation of scientific benefit of different mission scenarios –Task 3: including s/c and payload errors (from models provided by industry)

4 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #4 1-Nov-15 The Magnetic Field Contributions Described by the three Modules large scale

5 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #5 1-Nov-15 Contents of Industrial Package

6 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #6 1-Nov-15 Outline of Task 2+3 Mission Performance Simulator

7 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #7 1-Nov-15 Forward Scheme: Production of Synthetic Data Design of constellations Orbit Calculation –full mission: 4 years –mission start on January 1, 1997 (one solar cycle before anticipated launch) Calculation of synthetic magnetic and electric field data –magnetic field generator –electric field generator –auxiliary data

8 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #8 1-Nov-15 Orbit Design Constellation #1 Two pairs of satellites 450 and 550 km initial altitude 86.0° and 85.4° inclination lower satellites are close together separation a few hundred km upper satellites are at antipodal position 180° separation Different inclinations yields different drift rates 0.44 min/day differential drift rate corresponding to 90° separation after 27 months

9 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #9 1-Nov-15 Orbit Design Constellation #2 Pool of 6 (7) satellites Analysis of data from different combinations of up to 4 satellites Final name convention Swarm A (= 4) Swarm B (= 5) Swarm C (= 1) Swarm D (= 2)

10 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #10 1-Nov-15 Advantage of two satellites flying side-by-side Strong attenuation of large-scale magnetospheric terms Amplification of m»0 terms

11 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #11 1-Nov-15 Magnetic Field Gradient at 400 km altitude B r B  B  Magnetic field East-West Gradient of Magnetic field

12 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #12 1-Nov-15 Magnetic Field Generation

13 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #13 1-Nov-15 Improved Forward Scheme for Constellation #2 improved parameterization of magnetospheric sources: n=3, m=1 based on hour-by-hour analysis of world-wide distributed observatory data after removal of CM4 induced contributions are considered using a 3D conductivity model (oceans, sediments + deep-located mantle inhomogeneities) ”boosted” secular variation Noise added (based on CHAMP experience and Swarm specifications)

14 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #14 1-Nov-15 Power Spectral Density of Simulated Noise In January 2004 (production of data of constellation #2), the Phase A System Simulator models produces time series of magnetic field that are off by several nT. Therefore use of simple noise model, based on scaled CHAMP data  = (0.1, 0.07, 0.07) nT in agreement with Swarm performance requirements simple noise model Phase A noise model

15 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #15 1-Nov-15 Data Products For each constellation: 190 million satellite positions 10,950 data files 26.5 GB of data Production of synthetic data for one constellation takes a couple of weeks

16 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #16 1-Nov-15 In-flight Calibration and Alignment of the Vector Fluxgate Magnetometer (VFM) Calibration: Determination of the instrument response (including time and temperature drifts) by comparison with the readings of the Absolute Scalar Magnetometer (ASM) –methods developed for present single satellite missions Ørsted and CHAMP –Successful application to simulated Swarm data –exact timing of the instruments is essential (  t < 5 sec, cf. SRD) before in-flight calibration (using pre-flight values) after in-flight calibration

17 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #17 1-Nov-15 In-flight Calibration and Alignment of the Vector Fluxgate Magnetometer (VFM) Alignment: Determination of the rotation between the VFM and the star imager (ASC) –Single satellite methods work well provided that »the ”true” magnetic field is sufficiently well known »the difference  B has some special properties (distribution of  B in VFM frame) –Probably significantly relaxed conditions if constellation aspect (multi-satellite method) is considered –The mechanical stability of the VFM/ASC assembly (optical bench) is very essential! –Development of multi-satellite methods for in-flight alignment is needed

18 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #18 1-Nov-15 Various Approaches for Field Recovery Comprehensive Inversion (cf. presentation by T. J. Sabaka) Core Field and Secular Variation - Method 1 Core Field and Secular Variation - Method 2 Lithospheric Field Recovery - Method 1 (cf. presentation by H. Lühr) Lithospheric Field Recovery - Method 2 3-D Mantle conductivity - Method 1 (cf. presentation by N. Olsen) 3-D Mantle conductivity - Method 2

19 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #19 1-Nov-15 Test Plan Closed-loop-simulation: Test of the forward and inversion approaches using noise-free data –using data that only contain source fields for which we invert for Focus on field contributions that are main Swarm objectives –Core field and secular variation –Lithospheric field Test quantities: Difference between recovered and original model –Power spectrum of the model SH coefficients –Degree correlation  n of coefficients –Sensitivity matrix –Global Maps (e.g., of B r ) of the model difference Results: –successful recovery of the original model using clean, noise-free and noisy data Definition: noisy datadata containing S/C and payload noise noise-free datadata without S/C and payload noise clean datadata that only contain source contribution that is inverted for

20 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #20 1-Nov-15 Example of Closed-Loop Analysis Recovery of lithospheric field...... and of high-degree secular variation using data from 4 Swarm satellites and 88 observatories degree correlation  n > 0.9 Achieved by Comprehensive Inversion; details will be given by T.J. Sabaka original model recovered model difference

21 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #21 1-Nov-15 Results: Mission Performance Recovery of all relevant source contributions by Comprehensive Inversion (T. J. Sabaka) Recovery of the lithospheric field (H. Lühr) 3-D Conductivity of the Mantle (N. Olsen)

22 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #22 1-Nov-15 Comparison of Filter Method and CI CI superior at n<70, especially for terms m close to 0 Filter method is superior for n > 70

23 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #23 1-Nov-15 Mapping of 3D Mantle Conductivity Forward conductivity model contains near-surface conductors (oceans, sediments) local (small-scale) inhomogeneities (plumes, subduction zones) regional inhomogeneities (e.g., covering one plate) Attempt to map 3D mantle conductivity structure

24 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #24 1-Nov-15 Transfer Function: C-response C from local B z and B H, derived using a SHA Frequency dependence of C(  ) (or of other transfer functions) provides information on conductivity-depth structure  ( z ) Electromagnetic Induction: Attenuation of B with depth z:

25 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #25 1-Nov-15 Mapping of 3D Mantle Structure Real and imaginary part of the local C-response for a period of 7 days, reconstructed from time-series of spherical harmonic coefficients up to degree N. N = 5N = 9N = 45 (all terms)

26 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #26 1-Nov-15 Assessment: Core Field and Secular Variation Without Swarm: only ground station data With Swarm: local time coverage and improved quality Degree n Wavelength [km] 8 5000 14 2850 Degree relative error % 4.482 Degree correlation 0.9990.80 Total relative error %4

27 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #27 1-Nov-15 Assessment: Lithospheric Field A: 4-5 times more accurate than CHAMP Lower pair A+B (gradient) for detail Higher C separates external sources Combination A+B+C: optimal recovery up to n=130

28 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #28 1-Nov-15 Assessment: Lithospheric Field (cont.) B r at ground Degree n Wavelength [km] 60 667 110 364 Degree relative error % 4.147 Degree correlation 0.9960.88 Total relative error %7.9 degree n up to 60degree n up to 130 nT

29 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #29 1-Nov-15 True Model Swarm A+B+CSwarm A km Mission Performance: 3-D Mantle Conductivity Period 7 days Detection of inhomogenities of mantle conductivity is possible with Swarm constellation #2 Data from one satellite is sufficient to resolve inhomogeneities

30 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #30 1-Nov-15 Conclusions and Recommendations Full mission simulation performed for two constellations –Production of synthetic data of all relevant contributions to Earth’ smagnetic field –Recovery of the various field contributions using different approach Comprehensive Inversion was chosen as the primary approach Evaluation of Swarm constellations... and of the methods for field analysis Modified 3-satellite constellation (one pair of lower satellites, one higher satellite) fulfills the primary Swarm science objectives

31 Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #31 1-Nov-15 Recommendations for Future Studies Develop methods for pre-flight determination and test of VFM / ASC rotation Develop multi-satellite tools for in-flight alignment More sophisticated methods for utilizing the magnetic field gradient in geomagnetic field modelling Develop methods for imaging (mapping) of 3-D mantle inhomogeneities

Download ppt "Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #1 1-Nov-15 Swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Final Presentation The Swarm E2E."

Similar presentations

Time & Frequency Products R. Peřestý, J. Kraus, SWRM 4 th Data Quality Workshop 2-5 December 2014 GFZ Potsdam Recent results on ACC Data Processing 1 SWARM.

Time & Frequency Products R. Peřestý, J. Kraus, SWRM 4 th Data Quality Workshop 2-5 December 2014 GFZ Potsdam Recent results on ACC Data Processing 1 SWARM.
Geospace Electrodynamic Connections (GEC) Mission The GEC mission has been in the formulation phase as part of NASA’s Solar Terrestrial Probe program for.

Geospace Electrodynamic Connections (GEC) Mission The GEC mission has been in the formulation phase as part of NASA’s Solar Terrestrial Probe program for.
No. 1 Characteristics of field-aligned currents derived from the Swarm constellation Hermann Lühr, Jaeheung Park, Jan Rauberg, Ingo Michaelis, Guram Kervalishvili.

No. 1 Characteristics of field-aligned currents derived from the Swarm constellation Hermann Lühr, Jaeheung Park, Jan Rauberg, Ingo Michaelis, Guram Kervalishvili.
Repeat station crustal biases and accuracy determined from regional field models M. Korte, E. Thébault* and M. Mandea, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (*now.

Repeat station crustal biases and accuracy determined from regional field models M. Korte, E. Thébault* and M. Mandea, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (*now.
Coestimating models of the large-scale internal, external, and corresponding induced Hermean magnetic fields Michael Purucker and Terence Sabaka Raytheon.

Coestimating models of the large-scale internal, external, and corresponding induced Hermean magnetic fields Michael Purucker and Terence Sabaka Raytheon.
Separating internal geomagnetic secular variation and long-term magnetospheric field variations Monika Korte Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ.

Separating internal geomagnetic secular variation and long-term magnetospheric field variations Monika Korte Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ.
The European geomagnetic secular variation and acceleration over the last four decades Mioara MANDEA Giuliana Verbanac, Monika Korte Helmholtz-Zentrum.

The European geomagnetic secular variation and acceleration over the last four decades Mioara MANDEA Giuliana Verbanac, Monika Korte Helmholtz-Zentrum.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.

TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN 10-11 July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.

GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.
14/06/20151 MORE Requirements seen from ESA Pedro Pablos 1 st MORE Team Meeting 27 Febrero 2007.

14/06/20151 MORE Requirements seen from ESA Pedro Pablos 1 st MORE Team Meeting 27 Febrero 2007.
ASIC3 WorkshopLandsdowne, VA May 16-18, 2006 J. Harder Page 1 Calibration Status of the Solar Irradiance Monitor (SIM) : The Present and the Future Jerald.

ASIC3 WorkshopLandsdowne, VA May 16-18, 2006 J. Harder Page 1 Calibration Status of the Solar Irradiance Monitor (SIM) : The Present and the Future Jerald.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop 12-14 October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised 2006-01-05 by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
4 th Swarm QWG Meeting 2 – 5 December 2014GFZ Potsdam/D On Calibrating the Magnetometry Package Data Nils Olsen, DTU Space.

4 th Swarm QWG Meeting 2 – 5 December 2014GFZ Potsdam/D On Calibrating the Magnetometry Package Data Nils Olsen, DTU Space.
J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &

J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &
V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.

V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.
Physical Approach to the ASM-VFM residual investigation National Space Institute, DTU 3. December 2014.

Physical Approach to the ASM-VFM residual investigation National Space Institute, DTU 3. December 2014.
Swarm Data Processing and First Scientific Results

Swarm Data Processing and First Scientific Results
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.

The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #1 7-Sep-15 swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Mid Term Review The swarm E2E Consortium.

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #1 7-Sep-15 swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Mid Term Review The swarm E2E Consortium.
Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm PM1, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.

Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm PM1, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google