Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David."— Presentation transcript:

1 Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David L. Hough Dean – College of Education Missouri State University, Springfield

2 TeachersCounselorsLibrarians Building Leaders Missouri Educator Evaluation System Seven Essential Practices of Effective Evaluation Educator Preparation Programs (APR-EPP) Field & Clinical Experiences Certification Requirements Superintendents Missouri Standards & Quality Indicators with Professional Continuum PK-12 Schools Professional Practice & Learning

3 Missouri Context  54 Approved EPPs  13 Community College (AAT)  41 Four Year EPPs 13 State Programs 28 Private Programs  CAEP & SPA Accreditation – Voluntary  26 Programs (12 State; 14 Private)

4 MoSTEP – September 1999 Missouri Standards for Teacher Education Programs Data Points in a 7 Year Review Cycle – Grade Point Averages – Curricular Alignment – Faculty & Supervisors – College Base Scores – Praxis II Scores – Surveys – 1st Year Teachers & Principals

5 The Challenge & Our Journey Began in Fall 2010 – Build a Coherent & Cohesive Model for Continuous Improvement for ALL Educators – Involved PK-12, EPPs, & Professional Associations

6 MoSTEP to MoSPE Missouri Standards for Teacher Education Programs – Sept. 1999 8 Unit Standards Teaching Standards Aligned with INTASC 7 Year Review Cycle Missouri Standards for the Preparation of Educators – Nov. 2012 6 Unit Standards Teaching Standards Aligned with InTASC Replaced 7 Year Review Cycle with an Annual Performance Report

7 Data Points – MoSTEP to MoSPE MoSTEP 7 Year Review Cycle Data Points – Grade Point Averages – Curricular Alignment – Faculty & Supervisors – College Base Scores – Praxis II Scores – Surveys – 1 st Year Teachers & Principals MoSPE Annual Performance Report Current Data Points – GPA – Middle/Secondary – Praxis II and/or Missouri Content Assessments – Surveys – 1 st Year Teachers & Principals

8 Key – Regional Meetings  How do you measure the effectiveness of your educator preparation program?  3 Outcomes  State Builds Data System  Common Assessments  All providers held to the same standards!

9 Annual Performance Report Standard #1 – Academics – 1.1 – Certification Assessments Praxis II Ended August 2014 Missouri Content Assessments Start September 2014 – 1.2 – Content/Certification Program GPA Middle School Secondary School Standard #4 – Candidate – 1 st Year Teachers – 1.1 – First Year Teachers Survey – 1.2 – First Year Teachers Survey – By Principals

10 Annual Performance Report Standard #3 – Field & Clinical Experiences – Indicator #1 – Performance Assessments MoPTA – Teachers – Implemented in Fall 2015 – Data Included in the APR – 2016-2017 Academic Year MoSLPA – Building Principals – Implemented in Fall 2014 – Data Included in the APR – 2015-2016 Academic Year MoSCPA & MoLPA – School Counselors & Librarians – Implemented in Fall 2015 – Data Included in the APR – 2016-2017 Academic Year

11 Annual Performance Report Standard #3 – Field & Clinical Experiences – Indicator #2 – Missouri Educator Evaluation System – Results – 16 Standards & Quality Indicators Identified by 120+ School Districts Ratings Gathered From – Cooperating Teachers (16 – SQI) – EPP Supervisors (16 – SQI) – Building Principals (4 – SQI) Training Provided By DESE-OEQ – Observation Skills – Feedback

12 Communication Plan 2012-2013 – Technical & Supporting Data Reports – Compared EPP Data Points to State Averages – Individual EPP Conferences 2013-2014 – Webinars & Individual EPP Conferences – MoTAC Meetings (Assessment Directors) – Draft Report to State Board of Education

13 Communication Plan 2014-2015 & 2015-2016 – APR to EPPs for Review & Possible Appeals – Release to Individual EPPs – “Internal” Release to ALL EPPs for Review 2016-2017 – Publicly Reported in February 2017 2017-2018 – Publicly Reported in February 2018 – With Decisions – Mets & Not Mets

14 APR Comprehensive Guide Relates APR to MoSPE Calculations & Decisions Rules for Continued Approval Phase in New Indicators – Content Assessments – Performance Assessments – Missouri Educator Evaluation System

15 Report Format – Program Summary Performance AssessmentsEducator Evaluation System 15

16 Continuous Improvement Topics of Discussion – Use 2 Levels of Technical Advisory Committees – Small Cell Sizes & Use of Certification Clusters Currently Using N=30 Discussing Cell Sizes N=10 – Transition of Assessments – Fidelity of Data Points – Connections to Student Growth & Achievement – Possible Index of Variables – Other Measures?

17 Continuous Improvement Watching with Anticipation – Sharing the Vision & Methodology – Defining the Role of the Assessment Director – Varying Resources – Time & Personnel – Communicating Information Responsibility & Accountability All EPPs Including Arts & Sciences – Political – National & State Contexts – Redesign of Educator Preparation

18 Engaging Stakeholders Missouri Advisory Council for Certification of Educadtors (MACCE) Missouri Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (MACTE is an affiliate of AACTE) Missouri Council of Education Deans (formed in fall 2012) Missouri Advisory Board for Educator Preparation (MABEP – est. 2013, per HB5)

19 Moving Forward Joint meetings of the State Board of Education & the Coordinating Board for Higher Education Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) Network for Transforming Educator Preparation (NTEP) PK-12 – University Partnerships Bringing all stakeholders together

20 Evaluation? High need areas: math, physics, chemistry, foreign languages, special education.... Diversity & Educator “Pipeline” Relationship of GPA, MoGEA, MEP, MoCA, MoPTA to teaching and learning “Learner Ready Day One” Relationship of MEES to student learning – What is the role of higher education?

21 Contact Information David L. Hough – Dean, College of Education – Missouri State University – 901 S. National Avenue – Hill Hall 304 – Springfield, Missouri 65897 – 417-836-5254 – Email: DavidHough@missouristate.eduDavidHough@missouristate.edu – http://education.missouristate.edu/ http://education.missouristate.edu/

22 Contact Information Gale “Hap” Hairston – Director – Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education – Office of Educator Quality – Post Office Box 480 – Jefferson City, MO 65102-0480 – 573-751-1668 – Email: Gale.Hairston@dese.mo.govGale.Hairston@dese.mo.gov – Website: www.dese.mo.govwww.dese.mo.gov


Download ppt "Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google