Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOpal Gilbert Modified over 8 years ago
1
The Challenge of Designing ‘Good Enough’ Performance Measures & Results Framework Targets & Performance Management World Bank’s Public Sector Performance Global Expert Team 9 May Gwyn Bevan
2
Models of delivery of public services Knights / Knaves Econs / Humans Prospect theory Trust & Altruism (T&A) KnightsHumansReward failure? Hierarchy & Targets (H&T) Knights & Knaves EconsSack staff? Public Ranking (PR) KnightsHumansReputation? Choice & Competition (C&C) Knights & Knaves EconsWinners & losers?
3
UK’s natural experiment: before & after devolution (1999) NHSsSchools BeforeAfterBeforeAfter England T&A H&T PR C&C PR WalesT&AC&C PR C&C
4
H&T+PR: ‘naming & shaming’ spotlight + prospect theory Staff in zero-rated hospital ‘devastating …hit right down to workforce -- bad reports usually hit senior management upwards nurses demand changing rooms.. because being accosted in streets’ Source: Mannion et al (2005) ‘dirty dozen’ zero-rated CEOs (English NHS)
5
Hospital waiting times: T&A H&T+PR Numbers waiting elective admissions (England) (‘000s) H&T+PR
6
Hospital waiting times: T&A No/‘000 waiting > 3 months GP 1st outpatient appointment
7
Hospital waiting times. Natural experiment: T&A vs H&T+PR No/‘000 waiting > 3 months GP 1st outpatient appointment H&T+PR
8
Ambulances:T&A Source: Bevan & Hamblin (2009) % responses life-threatening emergencies < 8 minutes Target E & W
9
Ambulances. Natural experiment: T&A vs H&T+PR Source: Bevan & Hamblin (2009) % responses life-threatening emergencies < 8 minutes H&T+PR Target E Target W
10
% pupils achieving > 5 good grades at 16 Note: data are missing for 1998, 2001 & 2005 & these have been estimated as the mean values from adjacent years Schools: C&C+ PR
11
Schools. Natural experiment: C&C+PR vs C&C Note: data are missing for 1998, 2001 & 2005 & these have been estimated as the mean values from adjacent years Wales stops PR % pupils achieving > 5 good grades at 16
12
H&T & PR: design Residual domain R Gages on P No measures on P Tin openers on P Selected domain P
13
H&T & PR : problems of gaming Selected domain T: incentives apply to measures M[T] Excluded domain N : unimportant or cannot be measured Holmstrom & Milgram (1991)
14
H&T & PR: types of gaming N ? Worsen performance? M[T] ? Hit the target & miss the point Misreporting & cheating Collusion Target M[T] Domain N Domain T
15
For discussion Theory of contingency mix of models T&A performance measurement no gaming ineffective PR + H&T powerful gaming Design to counter gaming C&C choice attractive in principle Characteristics influence effectiveness
16
For discussion C&C: Requirements UniversitiesSchoolsHospitals Money follows choice Supply-side flexibility Information Transaction costs Management freedom
17
COFEPRIS: Commission for Protection against Sanitary Risks 9,000 registrations (value $1bn) required 150 registered in 2010
18
Elements for transformation of failing organisations English NHSCOFEPRIS Spotlight effect Naming & shaming in media Inform media of failure ‘Broken windows’ Waiting timesRegistrations Prospect theory Sack ‘failing’ CEOsSack underperforming middle managers RewardsName elite organisations Promote young able managers
19
COFEPRIS: Sanitary registrations Source: Mikel Arriola Peñalosa (2012) Federal Commissioner for the Protection against Sanitary Risks
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.