Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation at DERC Public Hearing in the matter of ARR for F.Y.2010-11 filed by Distribution Companies in Delhi by N. Ponrathnam 6/2/20161.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Presentation at DERC Public Hearing in the matter of ARR for F.Y.2010-11 filed by Distribution Companies in Delhi by N. Ponrathnam 6/2/20161."— Presentation transcript:

1 Presentation at DERC Public Hearing in the matter of ARR for F.Y.2010-11 filed by Distribution Companies in Delhi by N. Ponrathnam raja7769@yahoo.com 6/2/20161

2 Recovery of Charges by kWh Single Part Tariff : Charging only the actual amount of energy (measured in kWH) supplied to the consumer. The simplest form of charging and completely understood by all consumers does not have the scope of over recovery of the charges by the distribution companies. 6/2/20162 2

3 Recovery of Charges by MDI MDI Tariff : Charging based on the Demand Recorded along with the energy consumed by the consumer. The Demand based Tariff suitable for high tension consumers should not be forced on the low tension consumers who do not have any provision to maintain high load factor. Hence there is over recovery of the charges by the Distribution Companies from consumers with low load factor. 6/2/20163 3

4 Recovery of Charges by kVAh kVAh billing : Charging for apparent energy {real + reactive} consumed by the consumer. The cost of Automatic power factor correction panel / capacitors form the part of the Distribution System. kVAh billing allows over recovery of the charges from Low Tension consumers who are not capable to maintain high power factor. 6/2/20164 4

5 Recovery of Charges by TOD TOD Tariff : Charging based on the energy consumed by the consumer at a particular time of the day. The Tariff which allows the Distribution Companies over recovery of the charges from consumers at the peak load period. 6/2/20165 5

6 Agreement for Electric Supply There has to be an agreement between the Distribution Company and the consumer for levy of charges based on MDI Tariff {Agreeing for contract demand}, kVAh billing, TOD Tariff. Consumers concern is a must. 6/2/20166 6

7 Consumers Interest Commission created to work for the interest of the consumer should not allow the Distribution Company to force the consumers to pay more than the actual cost incurred by the Distribution Company. 6/2/20167 7

8 Electricity Act 2003 mandates the tariff to reflect cost of supply DERC miserably failed to comply with National tariff policy to reduce cross subsidy with in + 20% {excerpt BPL category } by 2011 with out giving a tariff shock. 6/2/20168 8

9 Separate tariff category for DIAL The Honourable Commission cannot (do not have jurisdiction to decide) decide preferential tariff for DIAL and violate Section 62(3) of Electricity Act 2003. 6/2/20169 9

10 Merger of MLHT and NDLT High Tension & Low Tension defined by The Electricity Rule 1956 is not repealed till date. Honourable Commission cannot amalgamate the categories MLHT (multi load high tension) and NDLT (non domestic low tension ) and violate the section 62(3) the Electricity Act 2003 (differentiation as per voltage). 6/2/2016106/2/201610

11 Distribution Loss / Theft Reduction of Aggregate Technical / Commercial losses is the sole responsibility of the distribution company. Theft cannot occur with out the knowledge of the distribution company ( participation of the official of the distribution company ). 6/2/2016116/2/201611

12 Responsibility of Metering Metering is the responsibility of the distribution company. Installing suitable sealed Fuse to protect the electrical installation including the meters is also the responsibility of the distribution company. Burnt meter/ stuck meter / slow meter assessment should be made on the average consumption of preceding or following month consumption. 6/2/2016126/2/201612

13 Defective Metering cannot be taken as theft of the consumer Burnt meter/ stuck meter / slow meter assessment cannot be taken as theft of the consumer. Assessment as per regulation 37 is penalizing innocent consumer. Hence the regulation 37 should be changed. 6/2/2016136/2/201613

14 Connected load The concept of connected load should be replaced by more relevant concept of sanction Load & Contract Demand. The meaning of Sanction Load and Contract Demand was put forward by MERC in the interim order in case 12 of 2004 dated 30-9-2004 and final order in case 12 of 2004 Dated 23-12-2004 6/2/2016146/2/201614

15 Punishment for theft The penalization is mandated as per section 127 & 135 of electricity Act 2003. The provisions of Electricity Act 2003 is contradicted by Annex II and section 37 of DELHI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CODE & PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REGULATIONS 6/2/2016156/2/201615

16 Load Shedding Load Shedding is the deficiency of the Distribution Company. The Honourable Commission should frame proper regulations and the methodology for implementation for the affected consumers as per section 57 of electricity Act 2003. 6/2/2016166/2/201616

17 THANK YOU For more details, please contact: N. Ponrathnam Vel Induction Hardenings 25,Majithia Industrial Estate, Waman Tukaram Patil Marg, Deonar, Mumbai -4000 88 Cell no: 98 69 46 88 16 Email ID: raja7769@yahoo.com 6/2/201617


Download ppt "Presentation at DERC Public Hearing in the matter of ARR for F.Y.2010-11 filed by Distribution Companies in Delhi by N. Ponrathnam 6/2/20161."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google