We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEdmund Hart
Modified 11 months ago
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Ethics Concepts & Cases Manuel G. Velasquez
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter One Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Ethics and Morality Ethics is the study of morality. – Morality = The standards that an individual or a group has about what is right and wrong, or good and evil. Example: B.F. Goodrich A7-D Fraud – Moral Standards = norms about the kinds of actions that are morally right and wrong, as well as the values placed on what is morally good or bad. – Non-Moral Standards: The standards by which we judge what is good or bad and right or wrong in a non-moral way.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Five Characteristics of Moral Standards Involve significant injuries or benefits Not established by authority figures Should be preferred to other values including self-interest Based on impartial considerations Associated with special emotions and vocabulary.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Business Ethics? Broadly, ethics is the discipline that examines one’s moral standards or the moral standards of a society to evaluate their reasonableness and their implications for one’s life. Business ethics is a specialized study of moral right and wrong that concentrates on moral standards as they apply to business institutions, organizations, and behavior.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Types of Ethical Issues Systemic—ethical questions about the social, political, legal, or economic systems within which companies operate. Corporate—ethical questions about a particular corporation and its policies, culture, climate, impact, or actions. Individual—ethical questions about a particular individual’s decisions, behavior, or character.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Can ethical qualities be attributed to corporations? View #1: corporations, like people, act intentionally and have moral rights, and obligations, and are morally responsible. View #2: it makes no sense to attribute ethical qualities to corporations since they are not like people but more like machines; only humans can have ethical qualities. View #3: humans carry out the corporation’s actions so they are morally responsible for what they do and ethical qualities apply in a primary sense to them; corporations have ethical qualities only in a derivative sense.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Arguments Against Business Ethics In a free market economy, the pursuit of profit will ensure maximum social benefit so business ethics is not needed. A manager’s most important obligation is loyalty to the company regardless of ethics. So long as companies obey the law they will do all that ethics requires.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Arguments Supporting Business Ethics Ethics applies to all human activities. Business cannot survive without ethics. Ethics is consistent with profit seeking. Customers, employees, and people in general care about ethics. Studies suggest ethics does not detract from profits and seems to contribute to profits.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate social responsibility refers to a corporation’s responsibilities or obligations toward society. Business ethics is both a part of corporate social responsibility and part of the justification for corporate social responsibility. Shareholder vs. Stakeholder Theory
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. New Issues in Business Ethics Advances in technology often create new issues for business ethics. – Currently, advances in information technology are creating new issues in business ethics. Increasing connections between the economic and social systems of different nations, known as “globalization”, has also created new issues in business ethics.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Differences Moral Relativism = the theory that there are no ethical standards that are absolutely true and that apply or should be applied to the companies and people of all societies. Objections to Moral Relativism: – Some moral standards are found in all societies; – Moral differences do not logically imply relativism; – Relativism has incoherent consequences; – Relativism privileges whatever moral standards are widely accepted in a society.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Differences According to the Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT), there are two kinds of moral standards: – Hypernorms: those moral standards that should be applied to people in all societies. – Microsocial norms: those norms that differ from one community to another and that should be applied to people only if their community accepts those particular norms.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Kohlberg’s Three Levels of Moral Development First Level: Pre-conventional Stages – Stage One: punishment and obedience orientation – Stage Two: instrumental and relative orientation Second Level: Conventional Stages – Stage One: interpersonal concordance orientation – Stage Two: law and order orientation Third Level: Post-conventional Stages – Stage One: social contract orientation – Stage Two: universal principles orientation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Moral Reasoning The reasoning process by which human behaviors, institutions, or policies are judged to be in accordance with or in violation of moral standards. Moral reasoning involves: – The moral standards by which we evaluate things – Information about what is being evaluated – A moral judgment about what is being evaluated.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Four Steps Leading to Ethical Behavior Step One: Recognizing a situation is an ethical situation. – Requires framing it as one that requires ethical reasoning – Situation is likely to be seen as ethical when: involves serious harm that is concentrated, likely, proximate, imminent, and potentially violates our moral standards – Obstacles to recognizing a situation: Euphemistic labeling, justifying our actions, advantageous comparisons, displacement of responsibility, diffusion of responsibility, distorting the harm, and dehumanization, and attribution of blame.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Four Steps Leading to Ethical Behavior Step Two: Judging the ethical course of action. – Requires moral reasoning that applies our moral standards to the information we have about a situation. – Requires realizing that information about a situation may be distorted by biased theories about the world, about others, and about oneself.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Four Steps Leading to Ethical Behavior Step Three: Deciding to do the ethical course of action. – Deciding to do what is ethical can be influenced by: The culture of an organization—people’s decisions to do what is ethical are greatly influenced by their surroundings. Moral seduction—organizations can also generate a form of “moral seduction” that can exert subtle pressures that can gradually lead an ethical person into decisions to do what he or she knows is wrong.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Four Steps Leading to Ethical Behavior Step Four: Carrying out the ethical decision. – Factors that influence whether a person carries out their ethical decision include: One’s strength or weakness of will One’s belief about the locus of control of one’s actions
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Moral Responsibility Three Components of Moral Responsibility – Person caused or helped cause the injury, or failed to prevent it when he or she could and should have (causality). – Person did so knowing what he or she was doing (knowledge). – Person did so of his or her own free will (freedom).
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Factors that Mitigate Moral Responsibility Minimal contribution – In general, the less one’s actual actions contribute to the outcome of an act, the less one is morally responsible for that outcome. Uncertainty – A person may be fairly convinced that doing something is wrong yet may still be doubtful about some important facts, or may have doubts about the moral standards involved, or doubts about how seriously wrong the action is. Difficulty – A person may find it difficult to avoid a certain course of action because he or she is subjected to threats or duress of some sort or because avoiding that course of action will impose heavy costs on the person.
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases 商业伦理 国贸学院 张小俊
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
McGraw-Hill© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter.
Social Responsibility and Ethics in Strategic Management
Ethical Decision Making , Ethical Theories
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ETHIS. CONCEPTS OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Classic Concept: Idea that the only social responsibility of the administration.
Chapter 5 Managing Responsibly and Ethically Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc. 5-1.
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Understanding Ethics 1-1 McGraw-Hill.
Chapter 3: Ethics and Social Responsibility Prepared by David Ferrell, B-books, Ltd. Designed by Eric Brengle, B-books, Ltd. Copyright 2012 by Cengage.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 7-1 Chapter Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Copyright ©2009 by Cengage Learning Inc. All rights reserved 1 Prepared by Amit Shah Frostburg State University CHAPTER 3 Designed by Eric Brengle B-books,
ETHICS in the WORKPLACE © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Welcome to Ethics.
Chapter 2 Leadership Traits and Ethics 1. 2 Understand personality profiles Understand reasons why executives careers can be derailed Describe the.
Business Ethics “doing well by doing good”
1 Chapter 3: Ethics and Social Responsibility Copyright Cengage Learning 2013 All Rights Reserved Introduction to Designed & Prepared by Laura Rush B-books,
Chapter 9 Personal ethics. Ethics and ethical theories Ethics is concerned with right and wrong and how conduct should be judged to be good or bad. Ethical.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Business ethics and social responsibility (chapt. 10) an oxymoron?!?! What is GOOD vs. What is Bad! behaviour of business and the treatment of stakeholders.
Ethical Decision Making
Ethics and Social Responsibility
Managing Ethics and Social Responsibility
Business Law with UCC Applications,13e
Lecture 09 Ethics & Social Responsibility. Social involvement as a business concept? Pre 1900’s business purpose exclusively economic.
1 Lamb, Hair, McDaniel CHAPTER 3 Ethics and Social Responsibility
Individual Factors: Moral Philosophies and Values
Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
Chapter 42 Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
9-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved CHAPTER NINE Ethics In Negotiation.
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 3-1 Chapter 3 Ethics and Social Responsibility.
Chapter 6 Individual Factors: Moral Philosophies and Values Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. MGT University of Bahrain.
Chapter 4 Ethics and Social Responsibility. Social responsibility - a business’s intention, beyond its legal and economic obligations, to do the right.
Moral Standards Moral standards deal with matters that can seriously injure or benefit humans. For example, most people in American society hold moral.
Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Chapter Three McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ethics and the Marketing Environment. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Sustainability Must have a healthy society to sustain business. Pyramid.
REPORTED BY: Mavee Cabrera Joan Aoki Fatima Carlotta
Management Ethics and Social Responsibility
Chapter 5: Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development
Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society Week 2 Topic Outlines.
Last Week… We looked at environmental influences on managing:
1 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility l an oxymoron?!?! l What is GOOD vs. What is Bad! l behaviour of business and the treatment of stakeholders.
Attitudes, Self-Concept, Values, and Ethics
A Framework for Ethical Decision Making
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Ethics and Social Responsibility.
Theory of Moral Development Lawrence Kohlberg. Lawrence Kohlberg (a professor at Harvard University) became famous for his early work in the early 70s.
Part Two: The Culture of Management Chapter 3: Managing Social Responsibility and Ethics Chapter 4: Managing Employee Diversity Chapter 5: Managing Organizational.
Chapter 5: Social Responsibility
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.