Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting / JSPS Core to Core Seminar Study of elementary process in Hall-C p(γ*,eK + )Λ/Σ 0 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting / JSPS Core to Core Seminar Study of elementary process in Hall-C p(γ*,eK + )Λ/Σ 0 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department."— Presentation transcript:

1 JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting / JSPS Core to Core Seminar Study of elementary process in Hall-C p(γ*,eK + )Λ/Σ 0 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku Univ. Toshiyuki Gogami

2 Contents Kawama-san’s results Derive the cross section by myself

3 Definition of the cross section Solid angle of HKS Average value The number of VP Including HES solid angle and acceptance

4 Contents Kawama-san’s results Derive the cross section by myself

5 Estimation of the number of events by the fitting ~Lambda~ Number : 6402.57 Mean : 28.5527 +- 19.7152 [keV/c2] ( Delta Mean : 28.5527 +- 19.7152 [keV/c2] ) Width : 1937.59 +- 52.1221 [keV/c2] ~Sigma~ Number : 1688.07 Mean : 76809.3 +- 42.7735 [keV/c2] ( Delta Mean : -149.659 +- 42.7735 [keV/c2] ) Width : 1848.15 +- 121.343 [keV/c2] peakbackground B : Half width at half maximum C : Center value

6 Cross section of p(  ,K + )  PRC 73, 035202 (2006) R. Bradford, et al. This work (Preliminary) 227±12±26 nb/sr Q 2 =0.01 (GeV/c) 2 →Compared with p( , K + ) 

7 K + production at small angles electroproduction SL: 0.41 = 0.35 + 0.004  0.001 + 0.06 (  = 0.7 ) a steep Q 2 dependence ? P. Bydzovsky’s presentation at ECT* 2011 (  *,K + ) JLab Hall-A E05-115 W=1.9 GeV Q 2 =0.01 (GeV/c) 2 2012/3/25 JPS 2012 年次大会

8 Contents Kawama-san’s results Derive the cross section by myself

9 Current missing mass spectrum JLab E05-115 CH 2, ~ 450 [mg/cm 2 ] ~ 2.0 [μA] ~ 38 [hours]

10 Current missing mass spectrum JLab E05-115 CH 2, ~ 450 [mg/cm 2 ] ~ 2.0 [μA] ~ 38 [hours] Accidental Coincidence Quasi free Λ from 12 C

11 The number of events of Λ and Σ 0 5760 ± 125 (Integrated : -5 – 9 MeV/c 2 ) 1579 ± 94 (Integrated : 72 – 86 MeV/c 2 ) Λ Σ0Σ0 JLab E05-115 CH 2, ~ 450 [mg/cm 2 ] ~ 2.0 [μA] ~ 38 [hours]

12 Definition of the cross section Solid angle of HKS Average value The number of VP Including HES solid angle and acceptance

13 Momentum acceptance cut (Λ) HES momentum region 1.0.770 – 0.900 2.0.770 – 0.835 3.0.835 – 0.900 52 Λ V g.s. ~8.5 msr

14 Momentum acceptance cut (Σ 0 ) HES momentum region 1.0.770 – 0.900 2.0.770 – 0.835 3.0.835 – 0.900 52 Λ V g.s. ~8.5 msr

15 Concerned efficiencies Log book Simulation Data Data (E01-011)

16 Preliminary results Notice that several cuts are applied for HKS  Solid angle should be less than ~8.5 msr  Cross section is going to be larger This 0.6 JLab E05-115, Q 2 = 0.01 [GeV/c] 2, W=1.93 [GeV] Kawama-san’s results

17 Summary and Outlook Summary – The elementary cross sections is similar to the results of p(γ,K + )Λ from CLAS and SAPHIRE Outlook – VP flux – Precise solid angle estimation of HKS (and HES) Depending on Momenta and angles – Efficiencies Tracking, Trigger, PID cut – Effective target thickness – Burned effect  Compare to the other experiments (Hall-A, CLAS, SAPHRE) and theories.

18 Estimation of the number of events by the fitting ~Lambda~ Number : 6402.57 Mean : 28.5527 +- 19.7152 [keV/c2] ( Delta Mean : 28.5527 +- 19.7152 [keV/c2] ) Width : 1937.59 +- 52.1221 [keV/c2] ~Sigma~ Number : 1688.07 Mean : 76809.3 +- 42.7735 [keV/c2] ( Delta Mean : -149.659 +- 42.7735 [keV/c2] ) Width : 1848.15 +- 121.343 [keV/c2] peakbackground B : Half width at half maximum C : Center value

19 Cut conditions to make the missing mass Cut conditions – 1.0 > NWC 1+2 – 5.0 < AC 1+2+3 – -1.0 < coincidence time + 54.9 < 1.0 – 0.08 < Mass square < 0.44 – HKS tracking chi-square < 150.0 – HES tracking chi-square < 150.0

20 K + survival Ratio after the mass square cut (CH 2 ) If applied these two cut at the same time  (Suv. Ratio) total = (Suv. Ratio1) + (Suv. Ratio2) – 1.0 Suv. ratio1 Suv. ratio2 Cut 2 Cut 1 K + survival ratio

21 K + survival ratio after AC cut (CH 2 ) (accut,wccut) = (5,-0.1) pi suv. ratio: 0.0631439+-0.00148976 K suv. ratio: 0.876875+-0.00513167 p suv. ratio: 0.911427+-0.0023794 (accut,wccut) = (10,-0.1) pi suv. ratio: 0.105762+-0.0019663 K suv. ratio: 0.931211+-0.00536427 p suv. ratio: 0.94023+-0.00243485 (accut,wccut) = (15,-0.1) pi suv. ratio: 0.141455+-0.00231043 K suv. ratio: 0.956913+-0.00547386 p suv. ratio: 0.960014+-0.00247285 Stricter cut of AC NPE looser cut of AC NPE π+π+ K+K+ p π+π+ K+K+ p

22 K + survival ratio after WC cut (CH 2 ) (accut,wccut) = (2000,1.1) pi suv. ratio: 0.922368+-0.00752531 K suv. ratio: 0.987653+-0.00566791 p suv. ratio: 0.133889+-0.000701787 (accut,wccut) = (2000,1) pi suv. ratio: 0.963952+-0.00777583 K suv. ratio: 0.989093+-0.0056741 p suv. ratio: 0.176933+-0.000821917 (accut,wccut) = (2000,0.9) pi suv. ratio: 0.971601+-0.00782181 K suv. ratio: 0.999575+-0.00571909 p suv. ratio: 0.259314+-0.00102927 Stricter cut of WC NPE looser cut of WC NPE π+π+ K+K+ p π+π+ K+K+ p

23 Tracking efficiencies ~~~~ HKS~~~~~~~ ch2 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.998974 +- 0.00760814 (0.761596%) h2o : Tracking Efficiency : 0.961109 +- 0.00190445 (0.198152%) li : Tracking Efficiency : 0.996378 +- 0.0205954 (2.06703%) be : Tracking Efficiency : 0.995274 +- 0.00535923 (0.538468%) b : Tracking Efficiency : 0.99921 +- 0.00912634 (0.913356%) c : Tracking Efficiency : 0.987929 +- 0.00179032 (0.181219%) cr1 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.974892 +- 0.00304261 (0.312097%) cr2 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.965851 +- 0.00320905 (0.332251% ) ~~~~ HES~~~~~~~ ch2 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00527844 (0.527844%) h2o : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00095474 (0.095474%) li : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.0172701 (1.72701%) be : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00419163 (0.419163%) b : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00820523 (0.820523%) c : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00153384 (0.153384%) cr1 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00100727 (0.100727%) cr2 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00103985 (0.103985%) 1 ….!? Need to check tracking code

24 HKS efficiency ε HKS = 0.169 – AC : 0.877 (+-0.005) – WC : 0.990 (+-0.006) – Tracking : 0.999 (+0.001, - 0.007) – M2 : 0.96 – Ctime : 0.99 – f decay : 0.252 (± 0.006) – f burn : 0.82

25 Definition of the cross section SIMULATION

26 Theta and Momenta of the scattered electrons

27 Angular acceptance cut θ e’ > 0.05 rad

28

29 Back ground estimation Optimal scaling factor  1.08 Black + (Green × scaling factor) = Blue Scaling factor : 1.


Download ppt "JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting / JSPS Core to Core Seminar Study of elementary process in Hall-C p(γ*,eK + )Λ/Σ 0 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google