1. www.issw2013.com Edge effects in propagation tests Edward (Ned) H. Bair 1,2*, Ron Simenhois 3, Alec van Herwijnen 4, and Karl Birkeland 5 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, USA 2 Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 3 Southeast Alaska Avalanche Center, Juneau, AK, USA 4 WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland 5 US Forest Service National Avalanche Center, Bozeman, MT, USA nbair@eri.ucsb.edu

2. www.issw2013.com 2 Introduction, propagation test length guidelines Extended Column Test (ECT), l = 90 cm Propagation Saw Test (PST), l = 100 cm or slab depth; whichever is greater Greene, E., et al., 2010: Snow, Weather, and Avalanches: Observational Guidelines for Avalanche Programs in the United States, 136.

3. www.issw2013.com 3 Introduction, stress concentration at edges

4. www.issw2013.com G – energy release rate of the slab G ∞ – asymptotic energy release rate (no far edge effect) F(r/l) – correction factor r is crack length l is test length G and G ∞ 4

5. www.issw2013.com 163 PSTs and ECTs on beams with l = 1-10 m, including some centered ECTs and PSTs Particle tracking on markers inserted into beams Finite element modeling for 3 profiles from pits done at tests Overview 5

6. www.issw2013.com 1.Full crack propagation decreased with test length 2.Greater collapse occurred at the trigger and far end of the beam than in the center 3.Wavelengths were ~ 3 m, 2x what is predicted by the anticrack model 4.The far edge effect is significant for tests up to ~ 2 m Major findings for ECTs and PSTs 6

7. www.issw2013.com Field test summary 7

8. www.issw2013.com Relative to the middle of the beam, the trigger edge collapsed 160% and the far edge collapsed 128%. Particle tracking, collapse amplitude 8

9. www.issw2013.com Particle tracking, wavelength 9

10. www.issw2013.com FE profiles 10

11. www.issw2013.com 3 profiles (a,b,c) fixed crack length (critical length) for each profile Finite element (FE) results 11

12. www.issw2013.com Correction factor from FE 12

13. www.issw2013.com We experimented with centered PSTs (CPSTs) and found that the critical length doubled. CPSTs require 2x as much digging for the same crack propagation length as a standard PST, so we find them less practical. Centered tests 13

14. www.issw2013.com We were able to track the collapse amplitude over time for some of the tests that failed on the same layer. The average decrease was 0.65 mm/day. Cool aside 14

15. www.issw2013.com PST and ECT results are sensitive to test length Longer tests could decrease false unstable results, *BUT* we need to test this hypothesis. To test our hypothesis, we will examine the accuracy of 2 m tests vs. standard 1 m tests on slope stability. Implications 15